24.04.2013 Views

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

A review of dipterocarps - Center for International Forestry Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management <strong>of</strong> Natural Forests<br />

4. Clearfelling System<br />

This system is used when there is a need to change the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the crop to a more valuable species. The<br />

restocking is through natural or artificial regeneration,<br />

the latter used to introduce a new species or to change<br />

the <strong>for</strong>est composition. As a consequence, the more<br />

valuable teak is introduced into sal <strong>for</strong>ests. The trend is<br />

to convert most <strong>of</strong> these <strong>for</strong>ests into plantations, making<br />

the future <strong>of</strong> sal <strong>for</strong>ests uncertain.<br />

Peninsular Malaysia<br />

Forest Management Systems<br />

<strong>Forestry</strong> in the modern sense was started in 1883 with<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>estry service. Prior to<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est management, logging was very<br />

selective, principally limited to the heavy hardwoods<br />

(mainly several dipterocarp secies), and only about 7m 3 /<br />

ha was taken out (Barnard 1954). Silvicultural operations<br />

were limited to enrichment plantings <strong>of</strong> the heavy<br />

hardwood, chengal (Neobalanocarpus heimii), which<br />

failed from lack <strong>of</strong> further tendings. But the demand <strong>for</strong><br />

timber increased, leading to over-exploitation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

select timbers. This prompted the authorities to develop<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> silvicultural systems.<br />

1. Regeneration Fellings<br />

In the beginning (1910-1922) Departmental<br />

Improvement Fellings were implemented. All species<br />

whose crowns interfered with the poles <strong>of</strong> any valuable<br />

timber species were removed. It was subsequently<br />

realised that such treatments had no impact on the<br />

immature trees. However, they resulted in pr<strong>of</strong>use young<br />

regeneration (Hodgson 1937). The improvement fellings<br />

had in fact been regeneration fellings. After 1932,<br />

Regeneration Improvement Fellings (RIF) came in to<br />

vogue. Inferior species were gradually removed over a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> fellings. If the regeneration was verified as<br />

successful, final felling <strong>of</strong> the valuable species was<br />

carried out. This in fact resembled the classical<br />

Shelterwood Systems.<br />

2. Malayan Uni<strong>for</strong>m System<br />

As a rule, no <strong>for</strong>ests were harvested without first carrying<br />

out RIF. During the Japanese Occupation (1942-1945)<br />

many <strong>for</strong>ests were clearfelled without the benefit <strong>of</strong> RIF.<br />

After the war, extensive surveys revealed that these areas<br />

contained adequate advanced regeneration without any<br />

137<br />

assistance. It was realised that if the <strong>for</strong>est had adequate<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> the fast growing dipterocarp species, a<br />

single clearfelling release could result in a greater<br />

stocking <strong>of</strong> a more uni<strong>for</strong>m crop <strong>of</strong> commercial species.<br />

This became the basis <strong>for</strong> the Malayan Uni<strong>for</strong>m System<br />

(MUS), which was introduced in 1948 <strong>for</strong> managing<br />

Lowland Dipterocarp Forests (Wyatt-Smith 1963).<br />

A detailed silvicultural system was developed (Wyatt-<br />

Smith 1963). It consists <strong>of</strong> felling the mature crop <strong>of</strong> all<br />

trees above 45 cm dbh, poison girdling all defective<br />

relics and non-commercial species down to 5 cm dbh,<br />

and releasing established seedlings. Seedling adequacy<br />

and suitable tendings underpinned the success <strong>of</strong> MUS.<br />

3. Modified Malayan Uni<strong>for</strong>m System<br />

In the mid-1970s, most <strong>of</strong> the lowland dipterocarp<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests were alienated <strong>for</strong> agricultural programmes, and<br />

<strong>for</strong>estry was confined to the hills and rough terrain<br />

unsuitable <strong>for</strong> agriculture. Under these new conditions<br />

it was considered difficult to apply the MUS. The<br />

principal problem was the lack <strong>of</strong> uni<strong>for</strong>m stocking <strong>of</strong><br />

natural regeneration. It was thought that enrichment<br />

planting could overcome this deficiency (Ismail 1966).<br />

This allowed all <strong>for</strong>ests to be opened up <strong>for</strong> logging,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> adequate seedling stocking, a prerequisite<br />

with MUS. Planting up understocked areas was carried<br />

out in the beginning, but their per<strong>for</strong>mance was very<br />

variable and unsatisfactory. Now, artificial regeneration<br />

is rarely carried out, or the practice is abandoned entirely.<br />

4. Selective Management System<br />

In the late 1970s, the Selective Management System<br />

(SMS) was introduced. This is a simplified version <strong>of</strong><br />

the Philippine Selective Logging System (see Appanah<br />

and Weinland 1990). The MUS was already discarded<br />

<strong>for</strong> working in the hillier terrain, and the modified-MUS<br />

proved unsatisfactory. The felling regime is <strong>for</strong>mulated<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> a pre-felling inventory. All commercial<br />

tree species above a certain size (ideally non<strong>dipterocarps</strong>,<br />

45 cm dbh; <strong>dipterocarps</strong>, 50 cm dbh) are<br />

felled, provided a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> residuals are left<br />

behind to <strong>for</strong>m the next cut in ca 30 years (Thang 1987).<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e the SMS relies on adequacy <strong>of</strong> healthy<br />

residuals which will respond to the cutting release <strong>for</strong><br />

the next cut some 25-30 years later. Seedling stocking<br />

is assumed to be present, or will be replenished by the<br />

maturing residuals. The SMS is regarded as more flexible<br />

<strong>for</strong> managing the highly variable <strong>for</strong>est in the hillier

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!