Biological field and laboratory methods for measuring the quality of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BIOLOGICAL METHODS 7.5 Hemiptera Brooks, G. T. 1951. A revision of the genusA nisops (Notonectidae, Hemiptera). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. XXXIV(8): 301-519. Cummings, C. 1933. The giant wa ter bugs (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. XXI(2): 197-219. Hungerford, H. B. 1933. The genus Notonecta of the world. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. XXI(9):5-195. Hungerford, H. B. 1948. The Corixidae of the western hemisphere. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 32: 1-827. Hungerford, H. B., and R. Matsuda. 1960. Keys to subfamilies, tribes, genera, and subgenera of the Gerridae of the world. U·niv. Kans. Sci. Bull. XLI(1):3-23. Schaefer, K. F., and W. A. Drew. 1968. The aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera of Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 47: 125-134. Schaefer, K. F., and W. A. Drew. 1969. The aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera (Belostomatidae and Saldidae) of Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 48:79-83. 7.6 Hirudinea Meyer, M. C., and J. P. Moore. 1954. Notes on Canadian leeches (Hirudinea), with the description of a new species. Wasmann J. Biology, 12(1):63-95. Sawyer, R. T. 1967. The leeches of Louisiana, with notes on some North American species (Hirudinea, Annelida). Proc. La. Acad. Sci. XXX: 32-38. 7.7 Hydracarina Crowell, R. M. 1960. The taxonomy, distribution, and developmental stages of Ohio water mites. Bull. Ohio BioI. Surv. 1(2):1-77. 7.8 Lepidoptera Lange, W. H. 1956. A generic revision of the aquatic moths of North America (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae Nymphulinae). Wasmann J. Biology, 14(1):59-114. • 7.9 Megaloptera Baker, J. R., and H. H. Neunzig. 1968. The egg masses, eggs, and first instar larvae of eastern North American Corydalidae. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 61(5):1181-1187. Davis, K. C. 1903. Aquatic insects in New York State. Part 7, Sialididae of North and South America. N. Y. State Mus. Bull. 68:442-486. Needham, J. G., and C. Betten. 1901. Aquatic insects in the Adirondacks. N. Y. State Mus. Bull. 47:383-612. Ross, H. H., and T. H. Frison. 1937. Studies of nearctic aquatic insects. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. 21 :57-78. 7.10 Mollusca Amos, M. H. 1966. Commercial clams of the North American Pacific Coast. US Bur. Comm. Fish. Circular, 237: 1-18. Baker, F. C. 1928. The fresh-water mollusca of Wisconsin. Wise. Acad. Sci. Bull. Part I. Gastropoda, 70:1-505. Part II. Pelecypoda, 70: 1-495. Branson, B. A. (No date). Checklist and distribution of Kentucky aquatic gastropods. Ky. Dept. Fish and Wildl., Res. Fish. Bull. No. 54. pp. 1-20. Call, R. E. 1899. Mollusca of Indiana. Ind. Dept. Geol. Nat. Res., 24th Ann. Rept. pp. 337-535. Clarke, A. H., Jr. and C. O. Berg. 1959. The freshwater mussels of central New York with an illustrated key to the species of northeastern North America. Mem. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. 367:1-79. Clench, W. J., and R. D. Turner. 1956. Freshwater mollusks of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida from the Escambia to the Suwannee River. Fla. State Mus. Bull. 1(3):97·239. Goodrich, C. 1932. The Mollusca of Michigan. Univ. Mich. Handbook Series No.5, pp. 1-120. Heard, W. H., and J. Burch. 1966. Key to the genera of freshwater pelecypods of Michigan. Mich. Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich., Circ. No.4 Ann Arbor. Ingram, W. M. 1948. The larger freshwater clams of California, Oregon, and Washington. J. Ent. Zool. 40(4):72-92. Leonard, A. B. 1959. Gastropods in Kansas. Kans. Univ. Dept. Zool., State Biol. Surv. 224 pp. Murry, H. D., and A. B. Leonard. 1962. Unionid mussels in Kansas. Kans. Univ. Dept. Zool., State BioI. Surv. No. 28. 104 pp. Ortmann, A. E. 1919. A monograph of the naiades of Pennsylvania. Part III, Systematic account of the Genera and species. Carnegie Inst. Mus. 8(1): 1-378. 36
MACROINVERTEBRATE REFERENCES Robertson, 1. C. S., and C. L. Blakeslee. 1948. The Mollusca of the NIagara frontier region. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 19(3):1-191. Sinclair, R. M., and B. G. Isom. 1963. Further studIes on the mtroduced asiatic clam Corbicula in Tennessee. Tenn. Stream Poll. Control Bd., Tenn. Dept. Public Health. 75 pp. Stein, C. B. 1962. Key to the fresh-water mussels (family Unionidae) of western Lake Erie. OhIO State Uniy., Stone Lab. 5 pp. Taft, C. 1961. The shell-bearing land snails of OhIO. Bull. Ohio BIOI. Surv. 1(3): 1-108. Thompson, F. G. 1968. The aquatic snails of the famIly Hydroblidae of peninsular Florida. Univ. Fla. Press. 268 pp. 7.11 Odonata Byers, C. F. 1930. A contribution to the knowledge of Florida Odonata. UilIY. I'la. BioI. SCI. Ser. 1(1): 1-327. Gorman, P. 1927. Guide to the insects of Connecticut. Part V, The Odonata or dragonflies of Connecticut. Conn. Geoi. Nat. Hist. Sury. 39: 1-331. Kennedy, C. H. 1915. Notes on the life history and ecology of the dragonflies (Odonata) of Washington and Oregon. Proc. US Nat. Mus. 49:259-345. Kennedy, C. H. 1917. Notes on the life history and ecology of the dragonflies (Odonata) of central California and Nevada. Proc. US Nat. Mus. 52:483-635. Needham, J. G., and M. J. Westfall, Jr. 1954. DragonflIes of North America. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. 615 pp. Walker, E. M. 1958. The Odonata ofCanada and Alaska. Vo!. 1 and 2. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto. Williamson, E. B. 1899. The dragonflIes of Indiana. Ind. Dept. Geo!. Nat. Res., 24th Annual Rept. pp. 229-333. Wright, M., and A. Peterson. 1944. A key to the genera of Anisopterous dragonfly nymphs of the United States and Canada (Odonata, suborder Anisoptera). Ohio J. Sci. 44: 151-166. 7.12 Oligochaeta Brinkhurst, R. O. ..1964. Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta. Part I. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, 116(5):195-230. Brinkhurst, R. O. 1965. Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta. Part II. Proc. Acad. Sci., Philadelphia, 117(4): 117-172. BrinkhUlst, R. O. 1969. Oligochaeta. In: Keys to Water Quality Indicative Organisms (Southeast United States). FWPCA, Athens, Ga. Galloway, T. W. 1911. The common fresh-water Oligochaeta of the United States. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc. 30: 285-317. 7.13 Plecoptera Claasen, P. W. 1931. Plecoptera nymphs of America (north of MeXICO). Published as Volume III of the Thomas Say Foundation, Ent. Soc. Amer. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. Claasen, P. W. 1940. A catalogue of the Plecoptera of the world. Mem. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. 232-: 1-235. Frison, T. H. 1935. The stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Sury. 20:281-371. Frison, T. H. 1942. Studies of North American Plecoptera. Bull. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. 22:235-355. Gaufin, A. R., A. V. Nebeker, and J. Sessions. 1966. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Utah. Uniy. Utah Bio!. Series, 14(1): 1-93. Harden, P. H., and C. E. Micke!. 1952. The stoneflies of Minnesota (Plecoptera). Univ. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. 201: 1-84. Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1970. Key to genera of Wisconsin Plecoptera (stoneflies) nymphs, Ephemeroptera (mayfly) nymphs, Trichoptera (caddisfly) larvae. Res. Rept. No. 67, Wis. Dept. Nat. Res., Madison. Jewett, S. G., Jr. 1955. Notes and descnptions concerning western stoneflies (plecoptera). Wasmann J. Bio!. 91(1):1-543. Jewett, S. G., Jr. 1959. The stoneflles (Plecoptera) of the PaCIfIC Northwest. Ore. State ColI. Press. 95 pp. Jewett, S. G., Jr. 1960. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of California Bull. Calif. Insect Sury. 6(6):125-177. Nebeker, A. V., and A. R. Gaufin. 1966. The Capnia Columbiana complex of North America (Capniidae:Plecoptera). Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 91: 467-487. Needham, J. G., and P. W. Classen. 1925. A monograph of the Plecoptera or stoneflies of America north of Mexico. Published as Volume II of the Thomas Say Foundation, Ent. Soc. Am. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, III. RIcker, W. E., and H. H. Ross. 1968. North American species of Taeniopteryx (Plec
Page 1 and 2:
... EPA-610/4-13 -001 July 1973 BIO
Page 3 and 4:
• FOREWORD Man and his environmen
Page 5 and 6:
Name Anderson, Max Arthur, John W.
Page 7 and 8:
The role of aquatic biology in the
Page 9 and 10:
FOREWORD 1 PREFACE CONTENTS BIOLOGI
Page 11 and 12:
BIOMETRICS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Ter
Page 13 and 14:
BIOLOGICAL METHODS sample or a plan
Page 18:
TABLE 1. RAW DATA ON PLANKTON COUNT
Page 33:
BIOLOGICAL METHODS y POSITIVE INTER
Page 40:
PLANKTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION . 2.0 SAM
Page 43 and 44:
sampling is usually sufficient. In
Page 45 and 46:
Several sampling methods can be use
Page 47 and 48:
100X. When combined with the ocular
Page 49 and 50:
float, examine the underside of the
Page 51 and 52:
of counts to numbers per ml is quit
Page 53 and 54:
pipet with distilled water into a c
Page 56:
BIOLOGICAL METHODS Calculate the ch
Page 59 and 60:
PLANKTON REFERENCES Holmes, R. W. 1
Page 61 and 62: PERIPHYIOI
Page 66 and 67: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Diatom Species P
Page 68 and 69: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Patrick, R. 1957
Page 70: MACROPHYTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION . 2.0
Page 73 and 74: 3.0 REFERENCES MACROPHYTON Blackbur
Page 75 and 76: I '" MACROINVERTEBRATES 1.0 INTRODU
Page 77 and 78: 1.0 INTRODUCTION The aquatic macroi
Page 79 and 80: the limitations of available sampli
Page 81 and 82: Because of the extreme spatial and
Page 83: predetermined depth. Grabs with spr
Page 86 and 87: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Because of the s
Page 88 and 89: BIOLOGICAL METHODS fauna and hydrol
Page 90: BIOLOGICAL METHODS technique, or co
Page 94: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Equitability "e,
Page 102 and 103: BIOLOGICAL METHODS TABLE 7. CLASSIF
Page 104 and 105: BIOLOGICAL METHODS TABLE 7. (Contin
Page 107 and 108: TABLE 7. (Continued) MACROINVERTEBR
Page 109 and 110: MACROlNVERTEBRATE REFERENCES 33. Ll
Page 111: MACROINVERTEBRATE REFERENCES Hauber
Page 115 and 116: FISH
Page 119: Deepwater seInIng usually requires
Page 122 and 123: BIOLOGICAL METHODS (Lonchocarpus ni
Page 124: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Figure 4. Gill n
Page 128 and 129: BIOLOGICAL METHODS the major univer
Page 130: BIOLOGICAL METHODS 7.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Page 133 and 134: Freshwater: Northeast FISH REFERENC
Page 135 and 136: FISH REFERENCES U.S. Department of
Page 137 and 138: BIOASSAY 1.0 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Page 139 and 140: BIOLOGICAL METHODS When making wast
Page 141 and 142: BIOLOGICAL METHODS TABLE 1. STOCK C
Page 145 and 146: BIOLOGICAL METHODS the concentratio
Page 148: BIOLOGICAL METHODS Dimick, R. E., a
Page 152 and 153: Laboratory in Newtown, Ohio. Groups
Page 154 and 155: taining some yellow pigment, coarse
Page 157: Appendix A Test (Evansville, Indian
Page 160: 2.3 Food Use a good frozen trout fo
Page 163:
BIOLOGICAL METHODS 3.5 Methods When
Page 167 and 168:
APPENDIX
Page 177 and 178:
Item Source Cat. No. Unit Approx. C
Page 179:
2.3 Fish Sources of information on
Page 184:
Definitions In its original concept
Page 190:
To Minims _ Liquid Ounces _ Gills _
show all

Biological field and laboratory methods for measuring the quality of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?