VITAMIN A FORTIFIed PEANUT BUTTER - The Official Website of ...
VITAMIN A FORTIFIed PEANUT BUTTER - The Official Website of ... VITAMIN A FORTIFIed PEANUT BUTTER - The Official Website of ...
Table 5b.1 Vitamin A content and vitamin A recovery of fortified peanut butter processed by the collaborator's direct addition procedure (FDC, 2006a) Sampling point (during filling) Vitamin A Added (µgRE/g) Vitamin A Found (µgRE/g) Vitamin A Recovery (%) Start 14.99 4.38 29.24 Middle 14.99 19.10 127.38 End 14.99 8.47 56.48 Average 14.99 10.65 71.00 Std. deviation 0.00 7.60 50.66 % variability 0.00 71.32 71.32 Fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter taken at the start, middle and end of the filling operation into plastic bottles resulted in vitamin A contents of 4.384 µgRE/g, 19.10 µgRE/g and 8.468 µgRE/g, respectively or an average vitamin A content of 10.651 µgRE/g. Above data corresponded to vitamin A recoveries of 29.24%, 127.38% and 56.48% or an average vitamin A recovery of and a 71.03% and a variability of 71.32% (Table 5b.1). Vitamin A recovery was highest in fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter taken at the middle of the bottle filling operations, indicating that the vitamin A fortificant added was not fully dispersed at the top and bottom portions of the peanut butter matrix. Passing the fortified product in the colloid mill for the 2 nd grinding step and mechanical mixing of the fortified product at the cooling tank and filling tank, did not help in the dispersion of the fortified product. The highly viscous nature of peanut butter and the one-time addition of the vitamin A fortificant at the middle of the production batch, i.e. after two volumes of ~38 Kg peanut butter were transferred to the stainless steel vessel, were considered as the possible causes of low recovery and poor dispersion of the vitamin A in the fortified peanut butter. It is possible that when the vitamin A fortificant was added at the middle of the production batch (155.24 Kg) and subsequently mixed manually prior to the 2 nd grinding in the colloid mill and mixing in the cooling tank equipped with mechanical mixer, the fortificant did not fully disperse to other portions of the sweet and creamy peanut butter, i.e. at the top and bottom of the production batch, resulting in a higher concentration of the vitamin A at the middle of the production batch. To improve dispersion and recovery, it was recommended that the equivalent amount of vitamin A fortificant be added to each of the four volumes of ~38.81 Kg peanut butter in the stainless steel vessel after the 1 st grinding step. The amount of vitamin A fortificant to be added is 2.3286 g to every ~38.81 Kg peanut butter. The incorporation of the vitamin A fortificant to the peanut butter matrix in four portions, each added after 25% of the volume of the production batch is transferred to the stainless steel vessel, is expected to lead to better recovery and dispersion of the vitamin A fortificant in the peanut butter. 157
Study 1. Effect of increasing the number of addition/mixing times of fortificant to peanut butter in the developed process of the collaborator for stabilized peanut butter. Table 5b.2 shows the vitamin A content and vitamin A recovery of fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter processed by the four-time addition of the vitamin A fortificant at a weight ratio of 2.3286 g vitamin A palmitate in oil to every volume of ~38.81 Kg peanut butter. Fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter samples taken at the start, middle and end of the filling operation in plastic bottles resulted in vitamin A contents of 4.472 µgRE/g, 4.826 µgRE/g and 4.964 µgRE/g, respectively or an average vitamin A content of 4.754 µgRE/g. These corresponded to vitamin recoveries of 29.95%, 32.32% and 33.25%, respectively for an average vitamin A recovery of 31.84% and a variability of 5.34% (Table 5b.2). The low vitamin A contents were attributed to the exposure of the fortificant to the heat generated in the colloid mill during the subsequent 2 nd grinding step. The air incorporated during the subsequent mechanical mixing of the fortificant to the peanut butter matrix during the cooling and filling steps likewise could have contributed to the loss in vitamin A added. Table 5b.2 Vitamin A content and vitamin A recovery of fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter prepared with the vitamin A fortificant added at a weight ratio of 2.3286g vitamin A palmitate in oil to ~38.81 Kg peanut butter (FDC, 2006b) Sampling Point (during filling) Vitamin A Added (µgRE/g) Vitamin A Found (µgRE/g) Vitamin A Recovery (%) Start 14.93 4.47 29.95 Middle 14.93 4.83 32.32 End 14.93 4.96 33.25 Average 14.93 4.75 31.84 Std. deviation 0.00 0.25 1.70 % Variability 0.00 5.34 5.34 The vitamin A added however dispersed uniformly in the product as shown by the low variability of 5.34%. The percent variability obtained in this study was acceptable compared to the high 71.32% variability obtained in a previous study (FDC, 2006a) when a one-time addition of 9.3144 g vitamin A fortificant was added to two volumes of ~38.81 Kg peanut butter matrix. Thus, increasing the number of addition/mixing time of the vitamin A fortificant to the peanut butter matrix played an important role in improving the dispersion of the vitamin A added to the fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter. To further improve vitamin A recovery, the point of addition of the vitamin A fortificant was recommended to be changed from before the 2 nd grinding step to after the 2 nd grinding step, to prevent the exposure of the vitamin A to heat generated during the 2 nd grinding step. The method of addition of fortificant using a four-step process will be maintained. 158
- Page 108 and 109: Table 4.3 Analysis of Variance (ANO
- Page 110 and 111: Technology Transfer Results of the
- Page 112 and 113: CHAPTER 5a IMPROVEMENT OF A PROCESS
- Page 114 and 115: ackground, (b) Need to purchase add
- Page 116 and 117: METHODS For this project, the vitam
- Page 118 and 119: Study 2. Preliminary Verification o
- Page 120 and 121: Study 3. Establishment of Mixing Ti
- Page 122 and 123: Study 2. Validation of the Results
- Page 124 and 125: Table 5a.1 Evaluation of available
- Page 126 and 127: Process Flow Observation Evaluation
- Page 128 and 129: Table 5a.4 Vitamin A content and %
- Page 130 and 131: When the fortificant and stabilizer
- Page 132 and 133: Since the collaborator decided to u
- Page 134 and 135: (c) Processing area is too small su
- Page 136 and 137: APPENDIX A PROCESS FLOW FOR THE STA
- Page 138 and 139: (Note: The use of a wooden rod to p
- Page 140 and 141: APPENDIX B PROCESS FLOW FOR THE VIT
- Page 142 and 143: (Note: During the conditioning/temp
- Page 144 and 145: CHAPTER 5b IMPROVEMENT OF A PROCESS
- Page 146 and 147: INTRODUCTION Vitamin A deficiency i
- Page 148 and 149: the collaborator at Vitachem Indust
- Page 150 and 151: Four volumes of ~38.81 kg peanut bu
- Page 152 and 153: 4 parts of ~38.81 Kg peanut butter
- Page 154 and 155: Study 3. Effect of Incorporating th
- Page 156 and 157: Study 4. Validation of the Recovery
- Page 160 and 161: Study 2. Effect of incorporating th
- Page 162 and 163: Table 5b.4. Vitamin A content, % vi
- Page 164 and 165: CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of
- Page 166 and 167: APPENDIX A PROCEDURAL GUIDELINE FOR
- Page 168 and 169: 6. When all four (4) volumes of pea
- Page 170 and 171: Step No. Process Flow 17 Put label
- Page 172 and 173: ABSTRACT This document describes th
- Page 174 and 175: The process for the Vitamin A forti
- Page 176 and 177: 5. Storage of water supply: Water i
- Page 178 and 179: column of numbers 2.1 to 2.3 of the
- Page 180 and 181: 2. List of Personnel Who Attended I
- Page 182 and 183: 6. Handling of raw materials: The P
- Page 184 and 185: CONTROL NO. VIII. EXCLUSION OF PEST
- Page 186 and 187: Appendix A (Name of Company) STANDA
- Page 188 and 189: Date of Inspection: _______________
- Page 190 and 191: Appendix 3 Record No. 1 continued
- Page 192 and 193: Materials needed: Appendix D (Name
- Page 194 and 195: Date: __________ Appendix E (Name o
- Page 196 and 197: P2 V2 X1 = -------- P1 (1%) (3.78 K
- Page 198 and 199: Materials Needed: Appendix G (Name
- Page 200 and 201: Date: __________ Water Tank No. ___
- Page 202 and 203: Date of Inspection: _______________
- Page 204 and 205: Appendix L (Name of Company) EQUIPM
- Page 206 and 207: Appendix M-2 (Name of Company) WEEK
Study 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> increasing the number <strong>of</strong> addition/mixing times <strong>of</strong> fortificant to peanut butter in<br />
the developed process <strong>of</strong> the collaborator for stabilized peanut butter.<br />
Table 5b.2 shows the vitamin A content and vitamin A recovery <strong>of</strong> fortified sweet and creamy<br />
peanut butter processed by the four-time addition <strong>of</strong> the vitamin A fortificant at a weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.3286 g<br />
vitamin A palmitate in oil to every volume <strong>of</strong> ~38.81 Kg peanut butter.<br />
Fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter samples taken at the start, middle and end <strong>of</strong> the filling<br />
operation in plastic bottles resulted in vitamin A contents <strong>of</strong> 4.472 µgRE/g, 4.826 µgRE/g and 4.964<br />
µgRE/g, respectively or an average vitamin A content <strong>of</strong> 4.754 µgRE/g. <strong>The</strong>se corresponded to vitamin<br />
recoveries <strong>of</strong> 29.95%, 32.32% and 33.25%, respectively for an average vitamin A recovery <strong>of</strong> 31.84%<br />
and a variability <strong>of</strong> 5.34% (Table 5b.2). <strong>The</strong> low vitamin A contents were attributed to the exposure <strong>of</strong><br />
the fortificant to the heat generated in the colloid mill during the subsequent 2 nd grinding step. <strong>The</strong> air<br />
incorporated during the subsequent mechanical mixing <strong>of</strong> the fortificant to the peanut butter matrix during<br />
the cooling and filling steps likewise could have contributed to the loss in vitamin A added.<br />
Table 5b.2 Vitamin A content and vitamin A recovery <strong>of</strong> fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter<br />
prepared with the vitamin A fortificant added at a weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 2.3286g vitamin A<br />
palmitate in oil to ~38.81 Kg peanut butter (FDC, 2006b)<br />
Sampling Point<br />
(during filling)<br />
Vitamin A Added<br />
(µgRE/g)<br />
Vitamin A Found<br />
(µgRE/g)<br />
Vitamin A<br />
Recovery (%)<br />
Start 14.93 4.47 29.95<br />
Middle 14.93 4.83 32.32<br />
End 14.93 4.96 33.25<br />
Average 14.93 4.75 31.84<br />
Std. deviation 0.00 0.25 1.70<br />
% Variability 0.00 5.34 5.34<br />
<strong>The</strong> vitamin A added however dispersed uniformly in the product as shown by the low variability<br />
<strong>of</strong> 5.34%. <strong>The</strong> percent variability obtained in this study was acceptable compared to the high 71.32%<br />
variability obtained in a previous study (FDC, 2006a) when a one-time addition <strong>of</strong> 9.3144 g vitamin A<br />
fortificant was added to two volumes <strong>of</strong> ~38.81 Kg peanut butter matrix. Thus, increasing the number <strong>of</strong><br />
addition/mixing time <strong>of</strong> the vitamin A fortificant to the peanut butter matrix played an important role in<br />
improving the dispersion <strong>of</strong> the vitamin A added to the fortified sweet and creamy peanut butter.<br />
To further improve vitamin A recovery, the point <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> the vitamin A fortificant was<br />
recommended to be changed from before the 2 nd grinding step to after the 2 nd grinding step, to prevent the<br />
exposure <strong>of</strong> the vitamin A to heat generated during the 2 nd grinding step. <strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong><br />
fortificant using a four-step process will be maintained.<br />
158