History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it

History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it

centrostudirpinia.it
from centrostudirpinia.it More from this publisher
23.04.2013 Views

216 HISTORY OF CORN MILLING: vol. iv. TEDBURGH ^^^ importation of meal already ground, for which, of CORPORA- course, the purchasers refused to pay any efrindinof toll 1 V y TION MILLS. o o ^ to the town mills. It will be noticed that on this ^•A^P^,^^ matter the council, as mill-owners, were somewhat of Meal . • 1 1 1 r prohibited, weak; their origmal deed of purchase m 1670 had 1754- contained no clause binding the town to grind at the mills, nor (as was frequent in such clauses) prohibiting the import of meal, etc., already ground ; nor, again, in the agreement or contract of February 5, 1670, creating the thirl, was there any such prohibition. Yet when, in 1754, Isaac Wright, Ninian Black, and other private burgesses, not bakers, imported meal, the council entered actions against them. They pleaded that these burgesses '' have several times within two years not only abstracted certain multures of corn from the mill, which they have carried to other mills and ground there, but also, with a palpable design and intention to elude the effect of the thirlage, do barter their oats and other grain for meal ; or otherways do sell their corns and buy meal without the thirl, and bring paying it in and consume it in their families without multures or customs due for each boll of meal brought within the thirl ; to the great prejudice of the revenue of the town and the serious loss of the tacksmen of the mills and customs." The result of the action does not appear, but in 1759 the council formally resolved that, *' Whereas it was observed by the provost that there has happened several debates betwixt the tacksmen of the milns and the inhabitants with respect to importing meal into the town which had been grinded at other milns, and only paid eightpence at the boll [at those mills], be expedient, in order to prevent which, that some it would persons of the council should be named to enquire into the several acts of council anent the thirlage and importing meal into the town, and to prepare an

SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 21 overture for explaining and amending such acts, in order to promote peace and establish a rule whereby justice may be done both to the tacksmen and the inhabitants." Doubtless the committee found that the council had no prescriptive customary right to prevent the import of meal, but no result of their labours is recorded. In February 1761 the council, still in a quandary, vaguely resolved that, " taking into consideration that the acts and regulations for levying dues at the milns and gathering the customs and other branches of the town's revenue are fallen into confusion by not being duly transcribed in the dean of guild book," a committee should "make up a statement of the acts and regulations, old and new, with power to make what improvements they shall think most conducive for the interest of the town and benefit of the inhabitants." In March, the committee having examined the said acts " and made some alterations therein," the whole were adopted and entered in the guild book, and duly signed by the provost on every page. The upshot was that " the haill inhabitants within the said burgh, being astricted and thirled to the milns of Jed- burgh, now comprehending the barley and walk milns, conformable to the contract of thirlage of February 5, 1670, shall in all time coming pay and perform the " multures and services following ; the multures being scheduled as already given. Three years later the difficult problem at issue was attempted to be solved by a simple enactment of the council (March 1764) that, "Whoever of the inhabi- tants shall grind any corns, whether growing on the Jedburgh lands or elsewhere, at any other miln than the Jedburgh milns, shall be lyable in double multure whether the meal be grinded for their own private use or be sold by them within the town." But obviously, JEDBURGH CORPORA- TION MILLS. 3. Import of Meal prohibited 1754-

SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 21<br />

overture for explaining and amending such acts, in<br />

order to promote peace and establish a rule whereby<br />

justice may be done both to the tacksmen and the<br />

inhab<strong>it</strong>ants." Doubtless the comm<strong>it</strong>tee found that the<br />

council had no prescriptive customary right to prevent<br />

the import <strong>of</strong> meal, but no result <strong>of</strong> their labours is<br />

recorded.<br />

In February 1761 the council, still in a quandary,<br />

vaguely resolved that, " taking into consideration that<br />

the acts and regulations for levying dues at the milns<br />

and gathering the customs and other branches <strong>of</strong> the<br />

town's revenue are fallen into confusion by not being<br />

duly transcribed in the dean <strong>of</strong> guild book," a comm<strong>it</strong>tee<br />

should "make up a statement <strong>of</strong> the acts and<br />

regulations, old and new, w<strong>it</strong>h power to make what<br />

improvements they shall think most conducive for the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> the town and benef<strong>it</strong> <strong>of</strong> the inhab<strong>it</strong>ants."<br />

In March, the comm<strong>it</strong>tee having examined the<br />

said acts " and made some alterations therein," the<br />

whole were adopted and entered in the guild book,<br />

and duly signed by the provost on every page. The<br />

upshot was that " the haill inhab<strong>it</strong>ants w<strong>it</strong>hin the said<br />

burgh, being astricted and thirled to the milns <strong>of</strong> Jed-<br />

burgh, now comprehending the barley and walk milns,<br />

conformable to the contract <strong>of</strong> thirlage <strong>of</strong> February 5,<br />

1670, shall in all time coming pay and perform the<br />

"<br />

multures and services following<br />

;<br />

the multures being<br />

scheduled as already given.<br />

Three years later the difficult problem at issue was<br />

attempted to be solved by a simple enactment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

council (March 1764) that, "Whoever <strong>of</strong> the inhabi-<br />

tants shall grind any <strong>corn</strong>s, whether growing on the<br />

Jedburgh lands or elsewhere, at any other miln than<br />

the Jedburgh milns, shall be lyable in double multure<br />

whether the meal be grinded for their own private use<br />

or be sold by them w<strong>it</strong>hin the town." But obviously,<br />

JEDBURGH<br />

CORPORA-<br />

TION MILLS.<br />

3. Import<br />

<strong>of</strong> Meal<br />

prohib<strong>it</strong>ed<br />

1754-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!