History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it
History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it History of corn milling .. - Centrostudirpinia.it
216 HISTORY OF CORN MILLING: vol. iv. TEDBURGH ^^^ importation of meal already ground, for which, of CORPORA- course, the purchasers refused to pay any efrindinof toll 1 V y TION MILLS. o o ^ to the town mills. It will be noticed that on this ^•A^P^,^^ matter the council, as mill-owners, were somewhat of Meal . • 1 1 1 r prohibited, weak; their origmal deed of purchase m 1670 had 1754- contained no clause binding the town to grind at the mills, nor (as was frequent in such clauses) prohibiting the import of meal, etc., already ground ; nor, again, in the agreement or contract of February 5, 1670, creating the thirl, was there any such prohibition. Yet when, in 1754, Isaac Wright, Ninian Black, and other private burgesses, not bakers, imported meal, the council entered actions against them. They pleaded that these burgesses '' have several times within two years not only abstracted certain multures of corn from the mill, which they have carried to other mills and ground there, but also, with a palpable design and intention to elude the effect of the thirlage, do barter their oats and other grain for meal ; or otherways do sell their corns and buy meal without the thirl, and bring paying it in and consume it in their families without multures or customs due for each boll of meal brought within the thirl ; to the great prejudice of the revenue of the town and the serious loss of the tacksmen of the mills and customs." The result of the action does not appear, but in 1759 the council formally resolved that, *' Whereas it was observed by the provost that there has happened several debates betwixt the tacksmen of the milns and the inhabitants with respect to importing meal into the town which had been grinded at other milns, and only paid eightpence at the boll [at those mills], be expedient, in order to prevent which, that some it would persons of the council should be named to enquire into the several acts of council anent the thirlage and importing meal into the town, and to prepare an
SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 21 overture for explaining and amending such acts, in order to promote peace and establish a rule whereby justice may be done both to the tacksmen and the inhabitants." Doubtless the committee found that the council had no prescriptive customary right to prevent the import of meal, but no result of their labours is recorded. In February 1761 the council, still in a quandary, vaguely resolved that, " taking into consideration that the acts and regulations for levying dues at the milns and gathering the customs and other branches of the town's revenue are fallen into confusion by not being duly transcribed in the dean of guild book," a committee should "make up a statement of the acts and regulations, old and new, with power to make what improvements they shall think most conducive for the interest of the town and benefit of the inhabitants." In March, the committee having examined the said acts " and made some alterations therein," the whole were adopted and entered in the guild book, and duly signed by the provost on every page. The upshot was that " the haill inhabitants within the said burgh, being astricted and thirled to the milns of Jed- burgh, now comprehending the barley and walk milns, conformable to the contract of thirlage of February 5, 1670, shall in all time coming pay and perform the " multures and services following ; the multures being scheduled as already given. Three years later the difficult problem at issue was attempted to be solved by a simple enactment of the council (March 1764) that, "Whoever of the inhabi- tants shall grind any corns, whether growing on the Jedburgh lands or elsewhere, at any other miln than the Jedburgh milns, shall be lyable in double multure whether the meal be grinded for their own private use or be sold by them within the town." But obviously, JEDBURGH CORPORA- TION MILLS. 3. Import of Meal prohibited 1754-
- Page 185 and 186: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 165 thinketh, wh
- Page 187 and 188: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 167 the actual w
- Page 189 and 190: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 169 burgesses an
- Page 191 and 192: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 171 KING S MILLS
- Page 193 and 194: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 173 assigns (inh
- Page 195 and 196: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 175 (the regicid
- Page 197 and 198: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 177 them. It wou
- Page 199 and 200: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 179 Remember the
- Page 201 and 202: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 181 V T . . no f
- Page 203 and 204: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. also in order to
- Page 205 and 206: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 185 ^14 6s. 8d.
- Page 207 and 208: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 187 to Sir Willi
- Page 209 and 210: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 189
- Page 211 and 212: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 191 credited wit
- Page 213 and 214: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 193 still remain
- Page 215 and 216: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 195 Manor of Wes
- Page 217 and 218: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 197 proved to be
- Page 219 and 220: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 199 i ^ A \^ ^.v
- Page 221 and 222: SOME FEUDAL MILLS, 201 1 82 1, when
- Page 223 and 224: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 203 Gallows Mill
- Page 225 and 226: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 205 bought at 70
- Page 227 and 228: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 207 of a mill at
- Page 229 and 230: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 209 Crabtree Lan
- Page 231 and 232: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 211 CHAPTER V. J
- Page 233 and 234: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 213 parts and pr
- Page 235: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 215 The entire c
- Page 239 and 240: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 219 it more for
- Page 241 and 242: SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 221 *' as a last
- Page 243 and 244: Carrying by millers GENERAL INDEX.
- Page 245: Loading. See Canying. Malt bought r
- Page 248 and 249: HISTORY OF CORN MILLING. Pour Volum
- Page 255 and 256: University of Toronto Library Acme
SOME FEUDAL MILLS. 21<br />
overture for explaining and amending such acts, in<br />
order to promote peace and establish a rule whereby<br />
justice may be done both to the tacksmen and the<br />
inhab<strong>it</strong>ants." Doubtless the comm<strong>it</strong>tee found that the<br />
council had no prescriptive customary right to prevent<br />
the import <strong>of</strong> meal, but no result <strong>of</strong> their labours is<br />
recorded.<br />
In February 1761 the council, still in a quandary,<br />
vaguely resolved that, " taking into consideration that<br />
the acts and regulations for levying dues at the milns<br />
and gathering the customs and other branches <strong>of</strong> the<br />
town's revenue are fallen into confusion by not being<br />
duly transcribed in the dean <strong>of</strong> guild book," a comm<strong>it</strong>tee<br />
should "make up a statement <strong>of</strong> the acts and<br />
regulations, old and new, w<strong>it</strong>h power to make what<br />
improvements they shall think most conducive for the<br />
interest <strong>of</strong> the town and benef<strong>it</strong> <strong>of</strong> the inhab<strong>it</strong>ants."<br />
In March, the comm<strong>it</strong>tee having examined the<br />
said acts " and made some alterations therein," the<br />
whole were adopted and entered in the guild book,<br />
and duly signed by the provost on every page. The<br />
upshot was that " the haill inhab<strong>it</strong>ants w<strong>it</strong>hin the said<br />
burgh, being astricted and thirled to the milns <strong>of</strong> Jed-<br />
burgh, now comprehending the barley and walk milns,<br />
conformable to the contract <strong>of</strong> thirlage <strong>of</strong> February 5,<br />
1670, shall in all time coming pay and perform the<br />
"<br />
multures and services following<br />
;<br />
the multures being<br />
scheduled as already given.<br />
Three years later the difficult problem at issue was<br />
attempted to be solved by a simple enactment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
council (March 1764) that, "Whoever <strong>of</strong> the inhabi-<br />
tants shall grind any <strong>corn</strong>s, whether growing on the<br />
Jedburgh lands or elsewhere, at any other miln than<br />
the Jedburgh milns, shall be lyable in double multure<br />
whether the meal be grinded for their own private use<br />
or be sold by them w<strong>it</strong>hin the town." But obviously,<br />
JEDBURGH<br />
CORPORA-<br />
TION MILLS.<br />
3. Import<br />
<strong>of</strong> Meal<br />
prohib<strong>it</strong>ed<br />
1754-