21.04.2013 Views

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.5 A semantic Constraint Grammar<br />

In the semantic, bilingual part of the Portuguese CG lexicon, meanings are expressed as<br />

translation alternatives, and kept apart by listing - for each alternative - a set of<br />

discriminators, - CG tags that are to be present in the final analysis for the alternative in<br />

question to be chosen:<br />

Portuguese word Danish translation to be chosen if tagged as<br />

palavra ord1 tag1 tag3<br />

ord2 tag1 tag5<br />

ord3 tag2<br />

ord4 tag4 tag5 tag6<br />

In principle, all kinds of tags can be used as discriminators, e.g. semantic prototype<br />

class and inflexion for nouns, valency, and subject class for verbs, semantic argument<br />

class for prepositions etc. Comparing discriminator lists with actual tag strings, the<br />

system goes for maximal discriminator instantiation. If palavra in the example has<br />

received the tag string ‘tag1 tag2 tag5’, then ord2 will be chosen as the correct meaning<br />

(translation).<br />

As explained in chapter 6.3 and 6.4, the semantic module of my parser aims at<br />

resolving bilingually motivated noun polysemy by disambiguating semantic prototype<br />

membership. Rules can either target prototypes directly, or indirectly via atomic<br />

semantic features. Chapter 6.5.1 discusses the techniques used to disambiguate atomic<br />

semantic features, while chapter 6.5.2 is concerned with direct prototype<br />

disambiguation. Chapter 6.5.3 explains how polysemy resolution can be achieved by<br />

exploiting information that is not primarily semantic, such as morphosyntactic<br />

information disambiguated at a lower level, and by the “instantiation” of valency<br />

patterns.<br />

6.5.1 Using feature inheritance reasoning<br />

In the parser’s lexicon, every noun entry features a ‘±’ list for all 16 atomic semantic<br />

features used in the system. This list is computed by a special program from the<br />

prototype spectrum of the noun in question. Positive features are marked with capital<br />

letters, negative features with small letters. Since the feature structures of a noun’s<br />

semantic prototypes are compiled on top of each other, many atomic features of<br />

polysemous nouns will appear as both positive (capital letter) and negative (small<br />

letter). Consider the following examples of polysemous institution nouns, with their<br />

Danish translation equivalents given according to semantic prototype inventory:<br />

- 376 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!