21.04.2013 Views

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an V a DERP a- [ANT]<br />

brad Vi as HV DERP bradi-<br />

psic Vo as DERP psico-<br />

psiqu ei as DERP psico-<br />

re sv DERP re [AG+]<br />

mini s DERP mini- [DIM]<br />

Prefix form is what the program's prefix module cuts off a word form it<br />

receives as input. Like suffixes, prefixes can come in several disguises, depending on<br />

the spelling context. Also, homonyms - with different combinatorial behaviour and<br />

semantics - do exist. Thus, 'a-' can be both an antonymy-prefix co-varying with 'an-'<br />

(one before vowels, the other before consonants) and a STATE-prefix, that combines<br />

in a kind of "circumfix" construction with causative suffixes like '-izar'.<br />

Base condition controls which root-initial letters a prefix can combine with: it<br />

may read V for vowel, C for consonant, or just something like 'lmn' for the individual<br />

letters 'l', 'm' and 'n'. Any letter x after the 'V' can be added to the prefix form, when<br />

searching for roots without an initial vowel (x may be called the standard ligation<br />

vowel for this particular prefix). Thus, both 'psic|análise' and 'psico|drama' can be<br />

found. Root initial doubling of 's' and 'r' after a prefix-vowel (which preserves the<br />

[s]- and [R]- sounds) is not listed as a base condition in the prefix lexicon, but treated<br />

directly in the program's main module (inflexional analysis) when called from the<br />

prefix module: 'mini-ssaia' (root 'saia').<br />

Word class condition must be matched by either the root's word class or - if<br />

any - by the words outermost suffix. Prefixes need only inward 13 compatibility<br />

conditions, since they do not by themselves influence a derived word's word class, so<br />

no information comparable to field 6 and 7 in the suffix lexicon is found here.<br />

(2) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____________<br />

| | | | (combinat. rules for inflexion endings)<br />

# # # #<br />

prefix ((( root ) suffix ) suffix ...) inflexion ending<br />

|_____________|<br />

|___________________|<br />

(semantic "circumfix" conditions)<br />

In the above expression, word class compatibility is checked along brackets, with<br />

"inward" and "outward" defined by the bracket's convexity orientation. Further<br />

combination rules apply between inflexion endings and the root or the last suffix.<br />

13 By Inward compatibility I understand word class or inflexion class compatibility with what the affix in question is<br />

attached to (i.e. a root or another affix closer to the root than itself), while outward compatibility is about what<br />

further/other affixes or endings may be attached to it, in the form of yet another onion layer - on top of the affix in<br />

question. This way, the use of a prefix may be conditioned not only by the root, but by another prefix, its inward<br />

neighbour in the affix segmentation chain, - and likewise, the use of a suffix may be conditioned by other (inwardly<br />

neighbouring) suffixes.<br />

- 33 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!