21.04.2013 Views

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Apart from the presence of predications or subjects, yet another argument,<br />

motivated by descriptional consistency, can be cited in favour of elliptic clausal<br />

readings: - the fact that, in Portuguese (unlike English and Danish), the co-occurrence<br />

of complementisers (conjunctions and relative or interrogative adverbs) and finite<br />

subclauses is 100%: There are no finite subclauses without complementisers, so why<br />

should there be complementisers without (at least incomplete) subclauses?<br />

In my system, I call this kind of predicator-elliptic, but subordinated clauses for<br />

averbal subclauses (@#AS). ‘Averbal small clauses’ would be another possibility, but<br />

might perhaps create confusion, since the term ‘small clause’ has been suggested, with<br />

another meaning, for English clauses with verbs and without complementisers (Radford,<br />

1988).<br />

In terms of CG-notation, marking such averbal subclauses (@#AS) is both<br />

unproblematic and logical: Clause form and function has so far been marked on the<br />

main verb for non-finite subclauses (@#ICL), and on the (obligatory) complementiser<br />

for finite subclauses (@#FS), so averbal subclauses, featuring a complementiser but<br />

lacking a verb, belong naturally in the second group, together with @#FS-clauses.<br />

Having accepted the notion of averbal clause, one then finds that every AS has<br />

two functional obligatory parts, (a) the complementiser, that bears tags for both internal<br />

function (usually, that of adverbial or subordinator), and external function, and (b) the<br />

predication. Due to the implicit notation, in CG, for complex constituents,<br />

complementiser and predication have to be linked by a dependency relation in order to<br />

“assemble” the clause. Though the predication/subject unit is doubtless the semantic<br />

kernel of the whole (and can even sometimes replace it, as seen in the @OC example<br />

2a), I have chosen the same technique as in PPs, where the linking element (the PRP) is<br />

regarded as dependency-head. For AS-predications, this link can then be expressed as<br />

@AS 'when'<br />

jovem [jovem] ADJ M/F S @AS< 'young'<br />

, Inocêncio integrou a corrente política Ação Popular.<br />

(4b) Quando [quando] ADV @ADVL @#AS-ADVL> 'when'<br />

garoto [garoto] N M S @AS< 'a boy'<br />

, não gostava de brigar.<br />

- 260 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!