21.04.2013 Views

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other adjunct adverbial subcategories, we can construct the following table of formal<br />

definitions of clause level function:<br />

test SUBJ ACC DAT PIV SC OC ADV ADVL PRED<br />

clefting<br />

predicate<br />

isolation:<br />

+ + () + + + + +/-* +<br />

fazer + - - - - - - + +<br />

acontecer - - - - - - - +/-* -<br />

fronting + + () + + - + +/-* +<br />

agreement VFIN - - - SUBJ ACC - - SUBJ<br />

pronoun ele/ela o/a () - o/¬a - assim<br />

substitution etc. etc. lhe (tal) (tal) lá<br />

(nomi(accu- etc.<br />

então<br />

native)sative) tanto 136<br />

assim<br />

etc.<br />

-* 137<br />

-<br />

interrogative o que o que - - o que o que como como como<br />

completion quem a quem<br />

qual ?qual quando etc. -<br />

onde<br />

quanto<br />

-*<br />

There are, however, adverbials (or what I would like to call adverbials) that do not pass<br />

the pronoun substitution test, and even those that do, don’t all behave in the same way<br />

syntactically. Consider:<br />

Provavelmente ele segunda-feira não foi ao banco de bicicleta.<br />

ADVL-1 ADVL-2 ADVL-3 ADV ADVL-4<br />

[Probably he Monday didn’t go to the bank by bicycle]<br />

In this sentence, only ’ao banco’ cannot be isolated from the predicate (*o que fez ao<br />

banco), therefore it is an argument (ADV). ’segunda-feira’ and ’de bicicleta’ are<br />

”ordinary” time-place-manner adverbs that can be clefted, fronted and replaced by<br />

(adverbial) pronouns. Still, there is a difference: First, adverbial 2 can replace 4, but not<br />

vice versa – the syntagmatic position between subject and predicator is forbidden for<br />

136 np-arguments after ’durar’ [7 semanas], ’custar’ [7 dólares], or ’nadar’ [7 quilômetros] can be replaced by ’tanto’, but not<br />

by ’a/o/as/os’, which makes them adverbials (ADV in the case of ’durer’ and ’custar’, ADVL in the case of ’nadar’) rather<br />

than direct objects.<br />

137 The category of adjunct adverbial must be seen as opposed to both ADV and PIV. ADVL differs from both ADV and<br />

PIV in that it isn’t valency bound to the verb (i.e. passes the predicate isolation test), but it covers both pp-constituents that<br />

can be replaced by adverbs (assim, lá, tanto, as in ADV) and pp-constituents that cannot (pp’s that would be called PIV if<br />

they failed the isolation test).<br />

- 215 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!