21.04.2013 Views

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

Eckhard Bick - VISL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

disambiguated), same level tags (to be disambiguated) and higher level ”secondary”<br />

tags (not to be disambiguated at the stage in focus). Parsing is here viewed as a<br />

progression through different levels of analysis, with disambiguated morphological<br />

tags allowing syntactic mapping and disambiguation, syntactic tags allowing<br />

instantiation of valency patterns and all three contributing to semantic<br />

disambiguation.<br />

In the illustration below, red upward arrows indicate disambiguation context<br />

provided by lower level ”primary” tags, blue downward arrows indicate<br />

disambiguation context provided by higher level ”secondary” tags.<br />

l<br />

e<br />

x<br />

i<br />

c<br />

o<br />

n<br />

polysemy tags<br />

uninstantiated<br />

valency tags<br />

ambiguous<br />

syntactic tags<br />

Table (1): Parsing level interaction<br />

mapping<br />

ambiguous word<br />

class & inflection<br />

tags<br />

Chapter 4 discusses the target grammar, especially on the syntactic level. The form<br />

and function categories used by the parser are defined and explicated, with special<br />

attention paid to verb chains, subclauses and adverbials. In the process I will sketch<br />

the outlines of a dependency grammar of Portuguese syntax that has been grown<br />

from the iterative interaction of corpus data and a dynamic CG rule system which<br />

structures such data by introducing and removing ambiguity, a process in which my<br />

linguistic perception of the object language (the Beast, so to say) had to reinvent<br />

itself continuously, on the one hand serving as a necessary point of departure for<br />

formulating any rule or ambiguity, on the other hand absorbing and assimilating<br />

corpus evidence of CG-elicited (or CG-disclaimed) distinctions. Finally, I will raise<br />

the question of the transformational potential of the Portuguese CG with regard to<br />

different theories of syntax. In particular I will argue that the traditional flat<br />

dependency syntax of CG can be enriched (by attachment direction markers and tags<br />

for subclause form and function) so as to allow transformation of a CG-parse into<br />

- 11 -<br />

disambiguated<br />

polysemy<br />

instantiated<br />

valency<br />

unambiguous<br />

syntax<br />

unambiguous<br />

morphology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!