20.04.2013 Views

Approximants + Secondary Articulations - Bases Produced

Approximants + Secondary Articulations - Bases Produced

Approximants + Secondary Articulations - Bases Produced

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Approximants</strong> +<br />

<strong>Secondary</strong> <strong>Articulations</strong><br />

November 27, 2009


Minor Details<br />

• Transcription exercise for Monday:<br />

• Bengali (VOT distinctions)<br />

• Arabic (Fricatives)<br />

• Quebec French (Fricatives + <strong>Approximants</strong>)<br />

• For next Friday: final production exercise (#4)<br />

• Both assignments have already been posted….<br />

• Your production exercise #3 grades will be returned by<br />

Monday.


Review Time<br />

• So far, we have talked in detail about the following classes<br />

of sounds:<br />

• Vowels<br />

• Stops<br />

• Trills<br />

• Fricatives<br />

• Affricates<br />

• Ejectives, Implosives, Clicks<br />

• A basic distinction: vowels and consonants


• Vowels<br />

Vowels and Consonants<br />

• Relatively unconstricted flow of air through vocal tract<br />

(above the glottis)<br />

• Shape (filter) the source of sound made at the glottis<br />

• Consonants<br />

• Completely or severely constricted flow of air through<br />

vocal tract (above the glottis)<br />

• Create a source of sound at the constriction (e.g.,<br />

release bursts, turbulence)<br />

• Voicing may be difficult<br />

• Note: this is a phonological distinction, not a phonetic one.


Obstruents and Sonorants<br />

• Phonologically speaking, there are also different kinds of<br />

consonants.<br />

• One important distinction is between obstruents and<br />

sonorants.<br />

• Obstruents<br />

• Stops, fricatives, affricates<br />

• Obstruct flow of air through the vocal tract so much that<br />

voicing is difficult<br />

• Sonorants<br />

• Nasals, approximants (glides, liquids), trills, flaps<br />

• Allow air to flow freely through vocal tract so that<br />

resonance (voicing) is still possible


<strong>Approximants</strong><br />

• <strong>Approximants</strong> = one articulator is close to another, but<br />

without producing audible turbulence.<br />

• They come in two flavors:<br />

1. Glides (English [w], [j])<br />

2. Liquids (English , [l])<br />

• This distinction is also phonological…<br />

• Glides are essentially high-vowel articulations which<br />

are not in a syllabic peak.<br />

• In English, liquids may form syllables (or syllable<br />

peaks).


Glides<br />

• Each glide corresponds to a different high vowel.<br />

Vowel Glide Place<br />

[i] [j] palatal (front, unrounded)<br />

[u] [w] labio-velar (back, rounded)<br />

[y] labial-palatal (front, rounded)<br />

velar (back, unrounded)


Glide Examples<br />

• French contrasts palatal, labio-palatal and labio-velar<br />

glides:<br />

• Japanese has velar vowels, but not necessarily velar<br />

glides...


Glide Acoustics<br />

• Glides are shorter than vowels<br />

• They also tend to lack “steady states”<br />

• and exhibit rapid transitions into (or from) vowels<br />

• hence: “glides”<br />

• Also: lower in intensity<br />

• especially in the higher formants


[j] vs. [i]


[w] vs. [u]


Vowel-Glide-Vowel<br />

[iji] [uwu]


More Glides<br />

[wi:] [ju:]


<strong>Secondary</strong> <strong>Articulations</strong><br />

• A secondary articulation is made by superimposing a<br />

glide-like articulation on top of another constriction<br />

elsewhere in the vocal tract.<br />

• Note that secondary articulations are different from<br />

double articulations.<br />

• In double articulations, both constrictions are of equal<br />

degree.<br />

• Ex: labio-velar stops ([kp])<br />

• With secondary articulations, there are two constrictions<br />

with an unequal degree of closure.<br />

• primary articulation: more constricted<br />

• secondary articulation: less constricted


Primary / <strong>Secondary</strong><br />

• One example of a secondary articulation is velarized .<br />

• Also symbolized:<br />

• Primary articulation: [l]<br />

• direct contact with tongue tip<br />

• <strong>Secondary</strong> articulation:<br />

• approximation of velum with back of tongue<br />

• The other commonly found secondary articulations are:<br />

• [ w ] labialization<br />

• [ j ] palatalization<br />

• pharyngealization


Labialization Examples<br />

• In labialization, lip rounding (specifically, protrusion) is<br />

superimposed on a fricative or stop constriction.<br />

• Examples from Bura (spoken in Nigeria):


Timing<br />

• The reason that [k w ] is not transcribed as [kw] has to do<br />

with timing.<br />

• [k w ]: peak of labial protrusion occurs during stop closure<br />

velum<br />

lips<br />

[k]<br />

[ w ]<br />

• [kw]: peak of labial protrusion occurs after stop closure<br />

velum<br />

lips<br />

[k]<br />

[w]


[m] vs. [m w ]<br />

[m w anta]


Palatalization<br />

• Consonants are palatalized by making a secondary [j]<br />

constriction.<br />

• Russian has contrastive palatalized consonants.


[p] vs. [p j ] vs. [pj]<br />

“sweat” (male name) “drink”


Post-vocalic Position<br />

[tot h ]<br />

• The acoustic effects of secondary articulations<br />

operate in reverse, when they appear after a vowel.


Pharyngealization<br />

• Consonants are pharyngealized by superimposing a<br />

pharynx narrowing gesture on the regular consonant<br />

articulation.<br />

• Mid-sagittal diagrams from Arabic:


Arabic Examples<br />

• Arabic contrasts pharyngealized and non-pharyngealized<br />

consonants.


[ti:n]<br />

[t] vs.<br />

• Pharyngeal constrictions raise F1 and lower F2<br />

• an -like formant pattern


• What about F3 distinctions?<br />

• They’re unusual.<br />

• For auditory reasons:<br />

A Note About F3<br />

• sensitivity to frequency distinctions drops off in the<br />

higher frequency regions.<br />

• However: English has very low F3.


English<br />

• English is distinctive because it has a very low F3.


And Again


Toothpick Time<br />

• typically combines three different approximant<br />

constrictions:<br />

1. Post-alveolar (retroflex)<br />

2. Lip rounding (labialization)<br />

3. Pharyngeal constriction (pharyngealization)<br />

• Hence, might be a better transcription.<br />

• English speakers make the retroflex constriction in two<br />

different ways:<br />

1.Tongue bunching<br />

2.Tongue curling<br />

• ⇒ The articulation of is very complex.


Bunching and Curling


Back to the videotape…


Rhoticized Vowels<br />

• Retroflexion is a feature which may be superimposed on<br />

other vowel articulations.<br />

• These vowels are said to be rhoticized.<br />

• Rhoticized vowels are contrastive in Badaga, a language<br />

spoken in southern India.


Retroflex Vowel Spectrograms<br />

[be]


Rhoticized vowels in English<br />

• Vowels before in Canadian + American English are<br />

consistently rhoticized.<br />

• Check out Bruce + Peter’s productions of “hard”.<br />

• Recall that there is a reduced set of vowel contrasts in<br />

this environment:<br />

•<br />

• Also note that there are alternative transcriptions for<br />

syllabic .<br />

• Namely:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!