NPS Mission - National Park Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Park Service FY 2013 Budget Justifications FY 2013 Program Performance Available funds will be directed to completing previously authorized studies first, then starting any newly authorized studies. Studies are authorized by Congress and requests may be legislated several times in any given year. Since 2008, the average length of time for each study has been reduced from 5.6 years to 4.5 years for completion. By FY 2015, the average length of time for each study should reach three years (from the time a new study is begun) at the current funding level. Fluctuations in this schedule are expected during peak periods, such as in 2009 when 19 additional studies were directed by Congress. Anticipated FY 2013 Special Resource Study Work (Including Rivers and Trails): • Allegheny Highlands Reconnaissance Study • Battle of Camden – SC • Battle of Matewan – WV • Butterfield Overland Trail – Multistate • Chattahoochee Trace NHA - AL and GA • Chisholm Great Western Cattle Trail – Multistate • Cold War Sites Theme Study – Multistate • D-Day Memorial – VA • Delaware River Tidal Reconnaissance Study • Fort San Geronimo SRS - Puerto Rico • Four Trail Study Update in Intermountain Region – Multistate CONST-59 • Harriet Beecher Stowe – ME • Honouliuli Gulch – HI • Lewis & Clark NHT, Eastern Legacy • Michigan Maritime Sites – MI • Missisquoi/Trout River – VT • Northern Neck NHA Feasibility Study – VA • Rim of the Valley SRS – CA • Shepherdstown – WV • Space Shuttle Columbia – TX • St. Genevieve Co – MO • Walnut Canyon SRS – AZ • Wolf House – AR
National Park Service FY 2013 Budget Justifications Activity: Management Planning Program Component: Environmental Impact Planning and Compliance Justification of FY 2013 Program Changes The FY 2013 budget request for the Environmental Impact Planning and Compliance program is $4,698,000 and 15 FTE, with no program changes from FY 2012 Enacted. Component Overview The Environmental Impact Planning and Compliance program supports parks, regions, and headquarters offices in the process of completing Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), Environmental Assessments (EA), and other compliance actions related to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) with a priority emphasis on legislatively or judicially mandated NEPA related compliance. This program also serves as the focal point for all matters relating to National Park Service NEPA planning and other related environmental mandates; provides NEPA-related technical assistance and training to parks, regions and WASO offices; and develops servicewide guidance on matters relating to NEPA planning and other federal resource protection mandates. The National Park Omnibus Management Act of 1998 and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) require park management decisions to be based on a full examination of alternatives and impacts and opportunities for public involvement. This program enhances the ability of the National Park Service to conduct legally defensible NEPA analyses that are scientifically based and that facilitate sound decisionmaking. In order to make NEPA and related compliance activities more efficient an integrated system to relate funding, planning, compliance and public comment has been developed and is in use for all NPS projects. This Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) system assures better coordination and timely completion of compliance through use of one bureau-wide web based system. FY 2013 Program Performance • Enhance the ability of the environmental review database (ER2000) to minimize impacts to National Park System resources and values through continuous improvements. ER2000 is a webbased database of Servicewide environmental reviews which allows parks, regions, and central offices to access information on other agencies’ projects currently under review by the NPS. • Provide training to NPS regions and park units on bureau policies to implement the National Environmental Policy Act. • Continue to provide policy-related technical assistance and manage complex planning and NEPA compliance projects. Anticipated FY 2013 Environmental Impact Analysis Work: • Antietam NB, Monocacy NB and Manassas NB - Deer Management Plan/EIS • Big South Fork NR&RA - Oil and Gas Management Plan/EIS • Big South Fork NR&RA – Mitigate Coal Mine Drainage Pollution EIS • Big Thicket NPres - Supplemental Oil and Gas Management Plan/EIS • Cape Cod NS - Herring River Restoration EIS • Cape Lookout NS - Off-Highway Vehicle Management Plan/EIS • Death Valley NP – Saline Valley Management Plan/EIS • Fire Island NS – Deer Management Plan/EIS • George Washington MemPkwy - Dyke Marsh Restoration Plan • Golden Gate NRA - Pet Management, Public Use CONST-60 • Jefferson National Expansion Mem – Revitalization Plan EA • Lake Meredith NRA - Off Highway Vehicle Management Plan/EIS • Morristown NHP – Deer Management Plan/EIS • Mojave NPres – Springs and Wildlife Guzzler Management Plan • NPS – Servicewide Bicycle Regulations Revision • NPS – Nonfederal Oil and Gas Development Regulations Revision/EIS • Padre Island NS - Supplemental Oil and Gas Management Plan/EIS • Pea Ridge NMP – Integrated Vegetation Management Plan/EA • Point Reyes NS – Drakes Bay Oyster Farm Permit EIS • Point Reyes NS – Multi-park Exotic Plant
Page 1 and 2:
NOTICE: These budget justifications
Page 3 and 4:
National Recreation and Preservatio
Page 5 and 6:
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv
Page 7 and 8:
National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
National Park Service ERRATA FY 201
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
. National Park Service FY 2013 Bud
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
National Park Service ERRATA FY 201
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304: National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 353: National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465:
show all

NPS Mission - National Park Service

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?