20.04.2013 Views

NPS Mission - National Park Service

NPS Mission - National Park Service

NPS Mission - National Park Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Service</strong> FY 2013 Budget Justifications<br />

Reduce Support for Unit Management Plans (FY 2012 Base: $6,903,000 / FY 2013 Request:<br />

-$225,000 / -1 FTE) – The Unit Management Planning effort was reduced as part of a re-engineering<br />

process to make the program more robust and efficient. In FY 2013, the program will continue to redirect<br />

resources from full-scale general management plans that are costly to produce and take years to<br />

complete, and utilize resources for the production of foundation documents and smaller scale plans. The<br />

program seeks a balance between statutory requirements, fiscal realities, and timeliness. New planning<br />

efforts will be smaller in scope and existing plans will be amended, where feasible, although a traditional<br />

general management plan could be conducted if necessary to meet park planning needs. The <strong>NPS</strong> seeks<br />

to redirect the capacity of regional planning offices so as to better meet park planning needs. In total,<br />

these efforts will further the interests of the <strong>NPS</strong> as a whole by providing lower cost products to a greater<br />

number of parks than could be previously be served. This will address park planning needs in a timely<br />

and more efficient way. Production of foundation documents will be a key program emphasis, so that by<br />

FY 2016 park units system-wide will have a firm basis for all management and planning decisions.<br />

Reduce Support for Special Resource Studies (FY 2012 Base: $2,412,000 / FY 2013 Request: -<br />

$225,000 / -1 FTE) – Special Resource Studies are directed by Congress to collect information about<br />

candidate areas to determine if they meet established criteria for significance, suitability, and feasibility as<br />

potential additions to the national park system. Products vary in complexity and duration depending on<br />

the scope of the study. Funding can be reduced in the short-term due to the current level of authorized<br />

study requests.<br />

Land Acquisition and State Assistance<br />

Increase Federal Land Acquisition (FY 2012 Base: $47,484,000 / FY 2013 Request: +$2,437,000) –<br />

Of the $2.437 million increase in LWCF funds requested for Land Acquisition, funding would be<br />

distributed to increase the Acquisition subactivities as discussed below:<br />

• Emergencies, Hardships, Relocations, and Deficiencies (+$74,000) – An increase of $0.074<br />

million would provide a minimal increase to this targeted element of the Acquisition program. The<br />

increased level of funding would permit the <strong>Service</strong> to address the increasing numbers of willing<br />

sellers who need quick resolution of their transactions. These funds can also be used to address<br />

Emergencies within the Inholding parks, and for Hardship, Relocation, and Deficiency cases (see<br />

description below). These acquisitions must still meet required authorization and prioritization<br />

guidelines. Unless there is a sudden, expensive emergency acquisition, this level of funding would<br />

permit the approximately 50 transaction requests currently in the queue to be addressed in a more<br />

timely manner, which is particularly critical in emergency situations.<br />

• Inholdings, Donations, and Exchanges (+$1,372,000) – An increase of $1.372 million would<br />

restore this targeted element of the Acquisition program to a more viable level, given the costs per<br />

acre of these older properties. The increased level of funding for this targeted acquisition element<br />

would permit the <strong>Service</strong> to address the increasing numbers of willing sellers who need quick<br />

resolution of their transactions, within the parks acquired prior to FY 1960. Additionally, these funds<br />

can address Donations and Exchanges (see description below). These acquisitions must still meet<br />

required authorization and prioritization guidelines. Unless there is a sudden, expensive single<br />

transaction, this level of funding would permit the approximately 60 transaction requests currently in<br />

the queue to be attended to in a more timely manner.<br />

• Federal Land Acquisition Projects (+$991,000) – An increase of $0.991 million in Federal land<br />

acquisition funding would bring total funding to $31.502 million, of which $20.179 million is for core<br />

acquisition projects that will facilitate the accomplishment of the <strong>NPS</strong> mission and improve the<br />

management of park units. The remaining $11.323 million is for the <strong>NPS</strong> acquisitions within the joint<br />

Department of Interior and Department of Agriculture’s Collaborative Landscape Planning effort to<br />

target key focal areas across the Nation. As part of the landscape program, the Bureau of Land<br />

Management (BLM), the Fish and Wildlife <strong>Service</strong> (FWS) and the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Service</strong> (<strong>NPS</strong>)<br />

collaborated extensively with the Forest <strong>Service</strong> (USFS) and with government and local community<br />

Overview-27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!