NPS Mission - National Park Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Park Service FY 2013 Budget Justifications because of the tight quarters and the need to maneuver up and over or between pipes and conduits in order to evacuate someone. Additionally, the wooden lids are not sealed so sewer gases can easily fill the utilidor at any time. Denali is in the sub-arctic region of Alaska, where winter temperatures can dip below -50 degrees Fahrenheit. In the winter months, demand for steam through the utilidor is greatest and steam loads are at their highest. In its current condition, the system is at risk for a major failure during this high demand time. A failure of the steam system during the winter months will cause the pipes to freeze in the sewer and water systems. The domino effect of system failures, beginning with the failure of the steam system, can occur in a matter of hours threatening the integrity of the assets in the headquarters area. The utilidor houses critical utility systems that are essential for everyday operation of the park. If the utility systems are allowed to continue to fail, the safety of the employees and the government investment in park assets will be compromised. Upon completion of the work described in this project, the overall condition of the utility systems in the utilidor will go from poor to good and will eliminate much of the health and safety deferred maintenance work associated with these sections of the front country utility systems. Ranking Categories: Identify the percent of the project that is in the following categories of need. 78 % Critical Health or Safety Deferred Maintenance 0 % Energy Policy, High Performance Sustain Bldg CI 4 % Critical Health or Safety Capital Improvement 0 % Critical Mission Deferred Maintenance 0 % Critical Resource Protection Deferred Maintenance 0 % Other Deferred Maintenance 18 % Critical Resource Protection Capital Improvement 0 % Code Compliance Capital Improvement 0 % Other Capital Improvement Capital Asset Planning Required?(Y or N): [ Y ] Total Project Score: 896 VE Required(Y or N): Y Type: Scheduled(YY): 10 Completed(YY): 10 Project Costs and Status Project Cost Estimate (This PDS): $'s % Deferred Maintenance Work : $ 7,518,000 78 Capital Improvement Work: $ 2,121,000 22 Total Component Estimate: $ 9,639,000 100 Class of Estimate: C Estimate Escalated to FY: 2013 Dates: Sch’d (qtr/yy) Construction Start/Award: 2Q⁄2013 Project Complete: 4Q⁄2014 CONST-13 Project Funding History (Entire Project): Appropriated to Date: $ 989,000 Requested in FY 2013 Budget: $ 9,639,000 Future Funding to Complete Project: $ 0 Project Total: $ 10,628,000 Planning and Design Funds Planning Funds Received in FY 2011 $ 361,000 Design Funds Received in FY 2009-2010 $ 628,000 Project Data Sheet Prepared/Last Updated: 01/2012 (mm/yy) Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs($s) Current: $267,000 Projected: $228,000 Net Change: - $39,000 DOI Approved: YES
National Park Service FY 2013 Budget Justifications DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2013 - 2017 National Park Service PROJECT DATA SHEET Project Identification CONST-14 Total Project Score/Ranking: 837 ⁄ 03 Programmed Funding FY: 2013 Funding Source: Line Item Construction Project Title: Install Emergency Shoring at Fronts 2 and 3 of Fort Jefferson Project No: 174086 Unit/Facility Name: Dry Tortugas National Park Region: Southeast Congressional District: FL18 State: FL DOI Asset Code Real Property Unique Identifier Project Justification API FCI-Before FCI- Projected 40800000 79444 100 0.029 0.029 Project Description: This mid-19 th century military fortress contains 6 sides, or Fronts. Each Front is numbered to reference a specific side of the fortress. The project will install steel shoring along the 600 feet of ocean-facing exterior wall (scarp) at the upper level of Front 3 and in five upper level gun enclosures, or casemates, at Front 2. The shoring will tie the water-facing scarp to the interior parade wall. The shoring will be left in place until Phase 3 (DRTO 149152) masonry stabilization work is completed. The design life for the shoring is at least 10 years. The shoring will be installed using scaffolding, high-lifts or both with access from the upper level, parade (fortress interior) and moat. All access measures will be removed after installation of the shoring. Project Need/Benefit: Structural evaluation of Fronts Two and Three, and Bastions one through three, was completed in 2008 and 2010 to determine the stability and associated risk in occupying these areas during a hurricane event and during stabilization work on the scarp. The structural engineering firm (4SE, Charleston, S.C.) concluded that shoring would need to be placed in each casemate which would confine the masonry walls and arches by placing a steel "clamp" from the parade walls to the exterior scarp. The firm further stated that continued occupancy and use by staff was a serious risk to staff. The park issued a task order for an additional structural analysis to determine if only individual casemates or if all of the front must be closed. Since this front contains eight of the 15 housing units on Garden Key, maintenance work shops, equipment storage and the islands wastewater treatment plant, closure of any of these spaces will have an immediate and costly impact to park operations and mission. All employee occupied housing in Front Three has been vacated and all operations will be relocated away from Front Three as soon as possible. Options for relocating operations, establishing temporary facilities or permanent replacement of existing facilities are limited. Ranking Categories: Identify the percent of the project that is in the following categories of need. 0 % Critical Health or Safety Deferred Maintenance 0 % Energy Policy, High Performance Sustain Bldg CI 50 % Critical Health or Safety Capital Improvement 0 % Critical Mission Deferred Maintenance 0 % Critical Resource Protection Deferred Maintenance 0 % Other Deferred Maintenance 50 % Critical Resource Protection Capital Improvement 0 % Code Compliance Capital Improvement 0 % Other Capital Improvement Capital Asset Planning Required?(Y or N): [ Y ] VE Required(Y or N): Y Type: C Scheduled(YY): FY 2012 Completed(YY): Total Project Score: 837
Page 1 and 2:
NOTICE: These budget justifications
Page 3 and 4:
National Recreation and Preservatio
Page 5 and 6:
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv
Page 7 and 8:
National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
National Park Service ERRATA FY 201
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
. National Park Service FY 2013 Bud
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
National Park Service ERRATA FY 201
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258: National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 307: National Park Service FY 2013 Budge
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465:
show all

NPS Mission - National Park Service

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?