20.04.2013 Views

Avraham and Sarah in Provence - Hakirah

Avraham and Sarah in Provence - Hakirah

Avraham and Sarah in Provence - Hakirah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Avraham</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sarah</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Provence</strong> : 245<br />

The Gemara (Megillah 13b) states that, <strong>in</strong> fact, Esther 94 never<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>oned her marriage to Mordechai, <strong>and</strong> when she left Achashveirosh<br />

at night she would return to Mordechai. This means that<br />

Achasheveirosh’s male tzurah did not transform her—she rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

constantly under the sway of Mordechai. In the end, Mordechai<br />

(Esther 9:4) also enters <strong>in</strong>to the house of this k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rises to great<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence there; i.e., the tzurah, the ideals of the Jewish people, will be<br />

accepted by nations of the world. Because Esther/chomer heeds the<br />

words of Mordechai/tzurah, Israel is saved <strong>and</strong> Mordechai’s tzurah<br />

will dom<strong>in</strong>ate the world. This is the story of Israel’s exile <strong>and</strong> eventual<br />

redemption.<br />

It is also important to note that Rambam’s <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the<br />

midrash as be<strong>in</strong>g non-literal is, <strong>in</strong> fact, implied elsewhere (Sanhedr<strong>in</strong><br />

74b) <strong>in</strong> the Talmud, where <strong>in</strong> a halachic discussion the simple render<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the gemara is that Esther was not married when chosen by<br />

Achashveirosh, <strong>and</strong> only for this reason could she submit to him.<br />

Other Rishonim, assum<strong>in</strong>g that the midrash must be taken literally, proceed<br />

to create halachic reasons as to why she could agree to relations<br />

with him, a gentile, while be<strong>in</strong>g married to Mordechai. Their view of<br />

halachah is affected by an aggadah, that Rambam understood immediately<br />

to be non-literal. 95<br />

Bann<strong>in</strong>g Material?<br />

Based on the ban of 1305 <strong>and</strong> what Rashba wrote on the matter <strong>in</strong><br />

his letters, it would seem that he would consider the above commentary<br />

nonsense, <strong>and</strong> more than that—dangerous nonsense that can<br />

lead to heretical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. Rabbi Vidofsky, who put out the modern<br />

version of M<strong>in</strong>chas Kena’os, writes <strong>in</strong> his <strong>in</strong>troduction with considerable<br />

excitement about the importance of gett<strong>in</strong>g this material out to<br />

the Jewish public. He feels that never more than now is this book<br />

94 שורושחא לש וקיחמ תדמוע התיהש ( ברד הימשמ)<br />

אמיל רב הבר רמא ותא הנמאב התיה<br />

יכדרמ לש וקיחב תבשויו תלבוטו.<br />

95 See Tosfos <strong>and</strong> Nimukei Yosef, ibid., also the Kesef Mishneh <strong>in</strong> Yesodei Ha-<br />

Torah 5:3. Because of this midrash, Rabbe<strong>in</strong>u Tam concludes that there is<br />

no violation of the שיא תשא רוסא nor תורזממ when a Jewish wife has<br />

relations with a non-Jew.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!