20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To help remind readers that the three legal orders existed in parallel to one another, I<br />

weave the story of one family, the Assarrafs, through all three parts of the dissertation. The<br />

Assarrafs were Jews living in Fez at the end of the nineteenth century. I glean most of my<br />

information about them from their archive of sharī‘a court documents—now in private hands—<br />

which traces their presence in the sharī‘a courts of Fez from about 1850 to 1912 (I introduce the<br />

family and their archive at greater length in Chapter One). Part One, which examines sharī‘a<br />

courts, draws most heavily on the Assarraf collection and thus focuses more on the Assarrafs<br />

themselves. Yet the family’s history runs throughout the dissertation as an example of how<br />

individuals moved among the three legal systems I discuss. Although this dissertation is not a<br />

micro-history of the Assarrafs’ legal lives, I use elements of micro-history to tie its different<br />

sections together.<br />

I begin with the legal orders which operated at the local level, that is, the courts of first<br />

instance where individuals fulfilled most of their quotidian legal needs. Part One thus examines<br />

sharī‘a courts and, to a lesser extent, batei din. Chapter One sets the stage; I orient readers to the<br />

jurisdictional rules which theoretically governed the respective spheres of authority of batei din<br />

and sharī‘a courts. I briefly look at the functioning of batei din in order to contextualize Jews’<br />

use of sharī‘a courts in the array of legal options available to them. Finally, I introduce the<br />

sources and especially the Assarraf family.<br />

The following two chapters in Part One look more closely at Jews’ use of sharī‘a courts.<br />

Chapter Two asks how Jews used sharī‘a courts for cases involving Muslims—that is, according<br />

to the jurisdictional guidelines outlined by Islamic law. I discuss how Jews were treated in<br />

sharī‘a courts, arguing that their experience did not differ greatly from that of Muslims. Drawing<br />

mainly on the Assarraf collection, I trace which matters brought the Assarrafs and their Jewish<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!