IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
were essentially legally independent or that their autonomy was largely imagined. This dissertation employs the framework of legal pluralism to understand how Jews simultaneously maintained their own legal order and made frequent use of the non-Jewish legal orders available to them. iv
Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………...iii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….vi Note on Transliteration and Names.………………………………………………………………x Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………….….1 Part I: Sharī‘a Courts Chapter 1: Between Batei Din and Sharī‘a Courts………………………………………………43 Chapter 2: Jews and Muslims in Sharī‘a Courts…………………………………………………68 Chapter 3: Crossing Jurisdictional Boundaries………………………………………………....118 Part II: The Makhzan as a Legal Forum Chapter 4: The Role of the Makhzan in the Moroccan Legal System………………………….150 Chapter 5: Appeals to the Ministry of Complaints……………………………………………..181 Chapter 6: Collective Appeals to the Makhzan………………………………………………...227 Part III: Consular Courts Chapter 7: Foreign Protection and Consular Jurisdiction………………………………………271 Chapter 8: Jews, Muslims, and Foreigners in Consular Courts………………………………...294 Chapter 9: The Intervention of Foreigners……………………………………………………...330 Epilogue………………………………………………………………………………………...371 Glossary of Arabic and Hebrew Terms………………………………………………………...379 Archives Consulted……………………………………………………………………………..382 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………384 v
- Page 1 and 2: IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS: JEWS,
- Page 3: Abstract This dissertation examines
- Page 7 and 8: throughout the process was vital to
- Page 9 and 10: and Arielle Rubenstein, Stephanie S
- Page 11 and 12: Introduction This dissertation exam
- Page 13 and 14: on the internal history of the Jewi
- Page 15 and 16: cases they made up close to half of
- Page 17 and 18: study of law in the Islamic world w
- Page 19 and 20: of these institutions remain opaque
- Page 21 and 22: and, for some individuals, appealin
- Page 23 and 24: actors with agency and to understan
- Page 25 and 26: many of those who espouse the neo-l
- Page 27 and 28: In recent years, the neo-lachrymose
- Page 29 and 30: alternative framework to that of au
- Page 31 and 32: including courts—which were of pr
- Page 33 and 34: Recently scholars working on the me
- Page 35 and 36: We are left with two models of Jewi
- Page 37 and 38: Legal pluralism is an approach to u
- Page 39 and 40: orders. I also turn the focus from
- Page 41 and 42: Nonetheless, the tendency of forum
- Page 43 and 44: Legal pluralism does not explain wh
- Page 45 and 46: Jewish communities were no less var
- Page 47 and 48: is perhaps best attested by the fac
- Page 49 and 50: To help remind readers that the thr
- Page 51 and 52: abusive Makhzan officials, infringe
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter One: Between Batei Din and
were essentially legally independent or that their autonomy was largely imagined. This<br />
dissertation employs the framework of legal pluralism to understand how Jews simultaneously<br />
maintained their own legal order and made frequent use of the non-Jewish legal orders available<br />
to them.<br />
iv
Change language