20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ented a third of the room for nine francs and four centimes per month, and Muḥammad b.<br />

Muḥammad al-Qārī rented the remaining two-thirds of the same room for eighteen francs and<br />

three centimes per month. 21 The two Muslim tenants would pay their rent at the beginning of<br />

each Jewish month, starting in Iyar of that year (which fell in April).<br />

Similarly, Jews continued to appear in sharī‘a courts for intra-Jewish commercial<br />

transactions. For instance, on March 16, 1920, a Jew named David b. Ḥaim bout a house in the<br />

millāḥ of Marrakesh from three of his coreligionists through his agent Yehudah b. Menaḥem al-<br />

Sharfā. Three weeks later, David b. Ḥaim sold half of this house to Yitzḥaq b. Moshe b.<br />

Ohayon. Both of these transactions were recorded in Arabic and signed by two ‘udūl and a<br />

qāḍī. 22 Again, these were deeds that, according to the new laws governing jurisdiction in<br />

Morocco, should not have been recorded in a sharī‘a court in the first place. The fact that David<br />

b. Ḥaim made sure his real estate transactions were notarized by ‘udūl further suggests that he<br />

thought his claim to the property might be challenged in a sharī‘a court—which also should not<br />

have been possible according to the new French laws.<br />

Preliminary research suggests that the French eventually succeeded in imposing a more<br />

rigid demarcation of jurisdictional boundaries separating Jewish and Muslim courts. The<br />

frequency with which Muslims elected to appear in Jewish courts seems to have petered off, if<br />

not stopped entirely, by the 1930s. An examination of about 150 documents entered in a register<br />

of the beit din of Fez covering the year 1934 did not yield a single case involving Muslims. 23 It<br />

is likely that a study of sharī ‘a court registers would similarly reveal that Jews brought their<br />

21<br />

PD, register of the beit din of Fez 1920-2, #35 and #36, 23 July 1920.<br />

22<br />

Yale, MS. 1825.1333, 25 Jumādā II 1338 and 17 Rajab 1338. I am grateful to Aomar Boum for bringing this<br />

document to my attention.<br />

23<br />

PD, register of the beit din of Fez 1934.<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!