IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
20.04.2013 Views

elationship among Jews, foreigners, and the Makhzan shifted according to the nature of the case. At times, Jews appealed to foreigners to intervene on their behalf. Often such appeals were made simultaneously with appeals to the Makhzan. In other instances, Jews only petitioned the Makhzan, especially for redress from injustices committed by foreigners. Jews, too, were often divided on whom to petition and for what purpose. Finally, the Makhzan’s own representation of the position of Jews in Moroccan society shifted in response to foreigners’ intervention on Jews’ behalf. Makhzan officials increasingly adopted a language of equal treatment to describe the proper behavior towards Jews. The ties linking Jews, foreigners, and the Makhzan were fluid and changed according to the particular circumstances of the time. 370

Epilogue On March 30, 1912, France declared a protectorate over most of present-day Morocco, and later that year Spain established its own protectorate over the north. In designing their colonial policies, the French authorities followed a different path from that taken in Algeria, which France had annexed in 1848. The protectorate instead followed the model they had created in Tunisia (colonized in 1881), which theoretically preserved the indigenous government alongside that of the French colonial authorities. 1 Hubert Lyautey, France’s first resident general in Morocco, was particularly intent on maintaining at least the appearance of the “traditional” Morocco alongside the changes introduced by the colonial regime’s modernization efforts. 2 Of course, the appearance of continuity was largely an illusion; in reality, the French colonial authorities held nearly all the political power, and their far-reaching reforms constituted a significant departure from what had existed before. Although Morocco had changed profoundly in the nineteenth century, 1912 represented a rupture unlike any the country had experienced for centuries. The legal regime instituted by the protectorate authorities followed the pattern of appearing to preserve the status quo. The French made a point of declaring Moroccan Jews “indigènes” (natives) alongside Muslims, in contrast to the policy in Algeria which had granted Jews citizenship in 1870. 3 Many, especially the AIU, lobbied hard for Jews to be naturalized as French citizens en masse like their Algerian coreligionists, but to no avail. 4 In their reform of 1 On the colonization of Tunisia, see esp. Kenneth J. Perkins, A History of Modern Tunisia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Chapter 2. 2 On Lyautey in Morocco, see esp. Daniel Rivet, Lyautey et l’institution du Protectorat français au Maroc, 1912- 1925, 3 vols. (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996). 3 Kenbib, Juifs et musulmans, 407-11. 4 Laskier, The Alliance Israélite Universelle, 163-71. 371

Epilogue<br />

On March 30, 1912, France declared a protectorate over most of present-day Morocco,<br />

and later that year Spain established its own protectorate over the north. In designing their<br />

colonial policies, the French authorities followed a different path from that taken in Algeria,<br />

which France had annexed in 1848. The protectorate instead followed the model they had<br />

created in Tunisia (colonized in 1881), which theoretically preserved the indigenous government<br />

alongside that of the French colonial authorities. 1 Hubert Lyautey, France’s first resident general<br />

in Morocco, was particularly intent on maintaining at least the appearance of the “traditional”<br />

Morocco alongside the changes introduced by the colonial regime’s modernization efforts. 2 Of<br />

course, the appearance of continuity was largely an illusion; in reality, the French colonial<br />

authorities held nearly all the political power, and their far-reaching reforms constituted a<br />

significant departure from what had existed before. Although Morocco had changed profoundly<br />

in the nineteenth century, 1912 represented a rupture unlike any the country had experienced for<br />

centuries.<br />

The legal regime instituted by the protectorate authorities followed the pattern of<br />

appearing to preserve the status quo. The French made a point of declaring Moroccan Jews<br />

“indigènes” (natives) alongside Muslims, in contrast to the policy in Algeria which had granted<br />

Jews citizenship in 1870. 3 Many, especially the AIU, lobbied hard for Jews to be naturalized as<br />

French citizens en masse like their Algerian coreligionists, but to no avail. 4 In their reform of<br />

1<br />

On the colonization of Tunisia, see esp. Kenneth J. Perkins, A History of Modern Tunisia (Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press, 2004), Chapter 2.<br />

2<br />

On Lyautey in Morocco, see esp. Daniel Rivet, Lyautey et l’institution du Protectorat français au Maroc, 1912-<br />

1925, 3 vols. (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996).<br />

3<br />

Kenbib, Juifs et musulmans, 407-11.<br />

4<br />

Laskier, The Alliance Israélite Universelle, 163-71.<br />

371

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!