IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
elationship among Jews, foreigners, and the Makhzan shifted according to the nature of the case. At times, Jews appealed to foreigners to intervene on their behalf. Often such appeals were made simultaneously with appeals to the Makhzan. In other instances, Jews only petitioned the Makhzan, especially for redress from injustices committed by foreigners. Jews, too, were often divided on whom to petition and for what purpose. Finally, the Makhzan’s own representation of the position of Jews in Moroccan society shifted in response to foreigners’ intervention on Jews’ behalf. Makhzan officials increasingly adopted a language of equal treatment to describe the proper behavior towards Jews. The ties linking Jews, foreigners, and the Makhzan were fluid and changed according to the particular circumstances of the time. 370
Epilogue On March 30, 1912, France declared a protectorate over most of present-day Morocco, and later that year Spain established its own protectorate over the north. In designing their colonial policies, the French authorities followed a different path from that taken in Algeria, which France had annexed in 1848. The protectorate instead followed the model they had created in Tunisia (colonized in 1881), which theoretically preserved the indigenous government alongside that of the French colonial authorities. 1 Hubert Lyautey, France’s first resident general in Morocco, was particularly intent on maintaining at least the appearance of the “traditional” Morocco alongside the changes introduced by the colonial regime’s modernization efforts. 2 Of course, the appearance of continuity was largely an illusion; in reality, the French colonial authorities held nearly all the political power, and their far-reaching reforms constituted a significant departure from what had existed before. Although Morocco had changed profoundly in the nineteenth century, 1912 represented a rupture unlike any the country had experienced for centuries. The legal regime instituted by the protectorate authorities followed the pattern of appearing to preserve the status quo. The French made a point of declaring Moroccan Jews “indigènes” (natives) alongside Muslims, in contrast to the policy in Algeria which had granted Jews citizenship in 1870. 3 Many, especially the AIU, lobbied hard for Jews to be naturalized as French citizens en masse like their Algerian coreligionists, but to no avail. 4 In their reform of 1 On the colonization of Tunisia, see esp. Kenneth J. Perkins, A History of Modern Tunisia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Chapter 2. 2 On Lyautey in Morocco, see esp. Daniel Rivet, Lyautey et l’institution du Protectorat français au Maroc, 1912- 1925, 3 vols. (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996). 3 Kenbib, Juifs et musulmans, 407-11. 4 Laskier, The Alliance Israélite Universelle, 163-71. 371
- Page 329 and 330: claimed that Emsellem had no right
- Page 331 and 332: number of foreign subjects and prot
- Page 333 and 334: By subjecting the suit to Moroccan
- Page 335 and 336: sued Mas‘ūd al-Shayẓamī (Meso
- Page 337 and 338: Foreign subjects and protégés wer
- Page 339 and 340: confirmed that this meant the Jews
- Page 341 and 342: AIU’s attention either through pe
- Page 343 and 344: A competing narrative of Moroccan J
- Page 345 and 346: non-Jewish Westerners alike, I argu
- Page 347 and 348: international press. Demnat might s
- Page 349 and 350: attribute the Makhzan’s efforts t
- Page 351 and 352: The events in Demnat were not the o
- Page 353 and 354: finally wrote to Muḥammad Bargās
- Page 355 and 356: wearing Muslim clothing and told hi
- Page 357 and 358: of 1863. Four Jews were accused of
- Page 359 and 360: made an honest mistake, the effect
- Page 361 and 362: etracted his initial testimony clai
- Page 363 and 364: the remaining two subjects. Only af
- Page 365 and 366: organizations, and the foreign pres
- Page 367 and 368: Marseillais, The Times, The Pall Ma
- Page 369 and 370: coreligionists’ position. 112 Avn
- Page 371 and 372: had been following the standard pra
- Page 373 and 374: did not declare that Jews and Musli
- Page 375 and 376: under the jurisdiction of Makhzan o
- Page 377 and 378: tolerance. 142 Such a policy would
- Page 379: concede to the American ambassador
- Page 383 and 384: courts to matters of personal statu
- Page 385 and 386: This sort of continuity in legal pr
- Page 387 and 388: intra-Jewish cases to these courts
- Page 389 and 390: Glossary of Arabic and Hebrew Terms
- Page 391 and 392: Ẓahīr: Royal decree (spelled “
- Page 393 and 394: United States: United States Nation
- Page 395 and 396: ———. Kitāb al-istiqṣā li-
- Page 397 and 398: Becker, Jerónimo. España y Marrue
- Page 399 and 400: Chetrit, Joseph. Diglossie, hybrida
- Page 401 and 402: Ennaji, Mohammed. Expansion europé
- Page 403 and 404: Gotzmann, Andreas. “At Home in Ma
- Page 405 and 406: ———. Les protégés : contrib
- Page 407 and 408: Marcus, Abraham. The Middle East on
- Page 409 and 410: Perron, M. Précis de jurisprudence
- Page 411 and 412: ———. “Forum Shopping Among
- Page 413: Cultural Dimensions, edited by Mich
Epilogue<br />
On March 30, 1912, France declared a protectorate over most of present-day Morocco,<br />
and later that year Spain established its own protectorate over the north. In designing their<br />
colonial policies, the French authorities followed a different path from that taken in Algeria,<br />
which France had annexed in 1848. The protectorate instead followed the model they had<br />
created in Tunisia (colonized in 1881), which theoretically preserved the indigenous government<br />
alongside that of the French colonial authorities. 1 Hubert Lyautey, France’s first resident general<br />
in Morocco, was particularly intent on maintaining at least the appearance of the “traditional”<br />
Morocco alongside the changes introduced by the colonial regime’s modernization efforts. 2 Of<br />
course, the appearance of continuity was largely an illusion; in reality, the French colonial<br />
authorities held nearly all the political power, and their far-reaching reforms constituted a<br />
significant departure from what had existed before. Although Morocco had changed profoundly<br />
in the nineteenth century, 1912 represented a rupture unlike any the country had experienced for<br />
centuries.<br />
The legal regime instituted by the protectorate authorities followed the pattern of<br />
appearing to preserve the status quo. The French made a point of declaring Moroccan Jews<br />
“indigènes” (natives) alongside Muslims, in contrast to the policy in Algeria which had granted<br />
Jews citizenship in 1870. 3 Many, especially the AIU, lobbied hard for Jews to be naturalized as<br />
French citizens en masse like their Algerian coreligionists, but to no avail. 4 In their reform of<br />
1<br />
On the colonization of Tunisia, see esp. Kenneth J. Perkins, A History of Modern Tunisia (Cambridge: Cambridge<br />
University Press, 2004), Chapter 2.<br />
2<br />
On Lyautey in Morocco, see esp. Daniel Rivet, Lyautey et l’institution du Protectorat français au Maroc, 1912-<br />
1925, 3 vols. (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996).<br />
3<br />
Kenbib, Juifs et musulmans, 407-11.<br />
4<br />
Laskier, The Alliance Israélite Universelle, 163-71.<br />
371