IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
justice.” 92 (I discuss this sort of change in language in greater detail below.) Although Mawlāy Muḥammad’s ẓahīr did little to change the status of Jews in Morocco, news of Montefiore’s purported success travelled throughout the Jewish world. Jews from all over Europe and as far as Iran congratulated Montefiore on his success and, through his mission, gained a new consciousness of their connection to Jews in Morocco. 93 These events make it clear that, contrary to the claims of much of the scholarship on the Safi Affair, Ben Yehudah and Lalouche were not put to death “without even the charade of a trial.” 94 In fact, the sultan consulted experts in Islamic law to determine whether the confessions of the four suspects were valid given the possibility that they been obtained under torture. Nor was the Makhzan acting entirely freely when it decided to put Ben Yehudah and Lalouche to death; the Spanish ambassador’s threats made it hard for the sultan to ignore his demands. Moreover, the Jews of Tangier who spearheaded the efforts to save Lalouche, Aflalo and Ben Moyal from meeting the same fate as Ben Yehudah did not only petition foreign diplomatic officials. On the contrary, after Lalouche’s execution, their first appeal was to the local Makhzan official. Whether or not Lalouche and Ben Yehudah were executed unjustly, the evidence from the Moroccan archives suggests that this was hardly an example of the Makhzan oppressing Jews and Europeans coming to save them. Reexamining Cause Célèbre II: Ntifa The Ntifa case is less widely remembered than the Safi affair, though at the time it garnered nearly as much attention from foreign consular officials, international Jewish 92 Al-nās kulluhum ‘indanā fī al-ḥaqqi sawā’ (ibid.). 93 See Green, Moses Montefiore, 313-15. 94 Gilbert, In Ishmael’s House, 117. 354
organizations, and the foreign press in Morocco and beyond. In the summer of 1880, not long after representatives from Europe, the Americas, and Morocco gathered at the Conference of Madrid, a Jew named Jacob Dahan died in the high-Atlas town of Ntifa. The circumstances surrounding his death were unclear; some claimed he was killed by the local governor, while others argued that he died of natural causes. Foreign officials and Jewish organizations generally took the view that Dahan had been murdered by the qā’id and demanded the punishment of the Makhzan official. Much like the Safi affair, Jewish historians writing about the Ntifa case emphasize the Makhzan’s oppression of Jews and the role of foreigners as their champions. Fenton and Littman portray the incident only from the viewpoint of foreign officials and Jewish organizations. 95 Martin Gilbert’s brief mention of the matter is limited to the observation that “Jacob Dahan was then taken outside, nailed to the ground and beaten so severely that he died.” 96 Moroccan historiography, on the other hand, largely exonerates the Makhzan from any responsibility. In his important early work on protection, ‘Abd al-Wahhāb Ibn Manṣūr mentions the Ntifa incident almost in passing: The press of Europe wanted … to make the governor of Demnat responsible for the death of the Jew Ya‘qūb al-Dahān, who died in Hantīfa [sic] under mysterious conditions … despite the Jewish community of Demnat’s denial (takdhīb) of these claims, and their acquitting the Moroccan governor from the allegation that he had killed him [Dahan]. 97 Ibn Manṣūr argues that Ntifa’s governor was guiltless in Dahan’s death, and that the foreign press had unfairly framed an innocent Makhzan official. He mentions (without, however, citing his source) that the Jews of Ntifa denied claims that Dahan was murdered by their governor. 95 Fenton and Littman, L’exil au Maghreb, 503, 519-20. 96 Gilbert, In Ishmael’s House, 117. 97 Ibn Manṣūr, Mushkilat al-ḥimāya, 55. 355
- Page 313 and 314: concerning the incident, which they
- Page 315 and 316: speculated that the reluctance of t
- Page 317 and 318: protection) of Yitzḥaq b. Nissim
- Page 319 and 320: cooperate with foreigners’ reques
- Page 321 and 322: Dinar Ohana), an American protégé
- Page 323 and 324: Jews tried to ensure a fortuitous o
- Page 325 and 326: ordered Assayag to stop paying Zagu
- Page 327 and 328: efused. 100 Faced with this dead en
- Page 329 and 330: claimed that Emsellem had no right
- Page 331 and 332: number of foreign subjects and prot
- Page 333 and 334: By subjecting the suit to Moroccan
- Page 335 and 336: sued Mas‘ūd al-Shayẓamī (Meso
- Page 337 and 338: Foreign subjects and protégés wer
- Page 339 and 340: confirmed that this meant the Jews
- Page 341 and 342: AIU’s attention either through pe
- Page 343 and 344: A competing narrative of Moroccan J
- Page 345 and 346: non-Jewish Westerners alike, I argu
- Page 347 and 348: international press. Demnat might s
- Page 349 and 350: attribute the Makhzan’s efforts t
- Page 351 and 352: The events in Demnat were not the o
- Page 353 and 354: finally wrote to Muḥammad Bargās
- Page 355 and 356: wearing Muslim clothing and told hi
- Page 357 and 358: of 1863. Four Jews were accused of
- Page 359 and 360: made an honest mistake, the effect
- Page 361 and 362: etracted his initial testimony clai
- Page 363: the remaining two subjects. Only af
- Page 367 and 368: Marseillais, The Times, The Pall Ma
- Page 369 and 370: coreligionists’ position. 112 Avn
- Page 371 and 372: had been following the standard pra
- Page 373 and 374: did not declare that Jews and Musli
- Page 375 and 376: under the jurisdiction of Makhzan o
- Page 377 and 378: tolerance. 142 Such a policy would
- Page 379 and 380: concede to the American ambassador
- Page 381 and 382: Epilogue On March 30, 1912, France
- Page 383 and 384: courts to matters of personal statu
- Page 385 and 386: This sort of continuity in legal pr
- Page 387 and 388: intra-Jewish cases to these courts
- Page 389 and 390: Glossary of Arabic and Hebrew Terms
- Page 391 and 392: Ẓahīr: Royal decree (spelled “
- Page 393 and 394: United States: United States Nation
- Page 395 and 396: ———. Kitāb al-istiqṣā li-
- Page 397 and 398: Becker, Jerónimo. España y Marrue
- Page 399 and 400: Chetrit, Joseph. Diglossie, hybrida
- Page 401 and 402: Ennaji, Mohammed. Expansion europé
- Page 403 and 404: Gotzmann, Andreas. “At Home in Ma
- Page 405 and 406: ———. Les protégés : contrib
- Page 407 and 408: Marcus, Abraham. The Middle East on
- Page 409 and 410: Perron, M. Précis de jurisprudence
- Page 411 and 412: ———. “Forum Shopping Among
- Page 413: Cultural Dimensions, edited by Mich
justice.” 92 (I discuss this sort of change in language in greater detail below.) Although Mawlāy<br />
Muḥammad’s ẓahīr did little to change the status of Jews in Morocco, news of Montefiore’s<br />
purported success travelled throughout the Jewish world. Jews from all over Europe and as far<br />
as Iran congratulated Montefiore on his success and, through his mission, gained a new<br />
consciousness of their connection to Jews in Morocco. 93<br />
These events make it clear that, contrary to the claims of much of the scholarship on the<br />
Safi Affair, Ben Yehudah and Lalouche were not put to death “without even the charade of a<br />
trial.” 94 In fact, the sultan consulted experts in Islamic law to determine whether the confessions<br />
of the four suspects were valid given the possibility that they been obtained under torture. Nor<br />
was the Makhzan acting entirely freely when it decided to put Ben Yehudah and Lalouche to<br />
death; the Spanish ambassador’s threats made it hard for the sultan to ignore his demands.<br />
Moreover, the Jews of Tangier who spearheaded the efforts to save Lalouche, Aflalo and Ben<br />
Moyal from meeting the same fate as Ben Yehudah did not only petition foreign diplomatic<br />
officials. On the contrary, after Lalouche’s execution, their first appeal was to the local Makhzan<br />
official. Whether or not Lalouche and Ben Yehudah were executed unjustly, the evidence from<br />
the Moroccan archives suggests that this was hardly an example of the Makhzan oppressing Jews<br />
and Europeans coming to save them.<br />
Reexamining Cause Célèbre II: Ntifa<br />
The Ntifa case is less widely remembered than the Safi affair, though at the time it<br />
garnered nearly as much attention from foreign consular officials, international Jewish<br />
92 Al-nās kulluhum ‘indanā fī al-ḥaqqi sawā’ (ibid.).<br />
93 See Green, Moses Montefiore, 313-15.<br />
94 Gilbert, In Ishmael’s House, 117.<br />
354