20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

among Jews, the Makhzan, and foreign officials. My approach replaces a linear model of<br />

foreigners inserting themselves in between the Makhzan and Jews with a fluid model in which<br />

the relationships among Jews, the Makhzan, and foreigners shifted depending on the<br />

circumstances of the case at hand. 8 I also focus on recovering the strategies of Jews at the local<br />

level and contextualizing them within the broader framework of Moroccan legal history.<br />

In the model I propose, Jews neither passively fell victim to the Makhzan nor were<br />

unwittingly duped by the divide-and-rule tactics of Europeans. On the one hand, as we saw in<br />

Part Two, Jews were able to petition the Makhzan for redress when they felt their rights had been<br />

violated; it was in the context of broader strategies which also included appeals to the Makhzan<br />

that Jews asked foreigners to intervene in their legal affairs. On the other hand, when Jews’<br />

grievances concerned foreign subjects or protégés, they tended to appeal to the Makhzan rather<br />

than foreigners. Jews’ appeals were not aimed exclusively at foreign diplomats and Jewish<br />

organizations; as with their choices of legal venues, Jews shopped among the various options to<br />

maximize the chances that their legal disputes would be addressed. At times, groups of Jews<br />

adopted different solutions for how to address their grievances, which could lead to<br />

disagreements among Jewish communities about which path of appeal to take.<br />

Another corrective to the neo-lachrymose narrative is the fact that foreigners’ perception<br />

of the Makhzan as arbitrary oppressor was not always accurate. On the contrary, what foreigners<br />

perceived as persecution was often merely the normal functioning of Islamic law and/or the state.<br />

Through a close examination of two “celebrity” cases which captured the interest of Jewish and<br />

8<br />

In so doing, I build on the work of Mohammed Kenbib, who argues that Europeans intervened on behalf of Jews as<br />

a way to interfere in Morocco’s internal affairs and thus extend their influence in the region; see especially Juifs et<br />

musulmans and Les protégés.<br />

334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!