20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It seems that Corcos was not the only protégé who preferred to avoid Carstensen’s<br />

consular court. In 1872, Carstensen dismissed Accan Levy, a Moroccan Jew who had been<br />

working as the interpreter for the British vice-consulate in Essaouira for a number of years. 135<br />

His explanation of his decision was brief but telling: “…proofs were obtained of Accan Levy<br />

being in the habit of applying to the local authorities, and of arranging cases of litigation without<br />

the vice-consul’s knowledge and consent; as also of his exacting unlawful remunerations and<br />

fees from persons in town.” In other words, Carstensen accused Levy of arranging for cases<br />

which concerned British subjects or protégés to be tried in sharī‘a or Makhzan courts. Most such<br />

cases would normally have been subject to British jurisdiction; this was the case for a dispute<br />

between Levy and Baruch Ohayon, a Moroccan Jew working as a commercial agent for the<br />

Englishman Grace. 136 Although Ohayon benefited from British protection as the associate of a<br />

British merchant, Levy wanted to avoid having their case tried by Carstensen because he was<br />

convinced that Carstensen would rule against him. Levy instead brought the case before the<br />

local pasha. However, Carstensen found out what Levy had done and insisted on trying the case<br />

since Ohayon was a British protégé. We can surmise that many of the cases which Levy<br />

redirected to “the local authorities” were similar to his dispute with Ohayon—that is, they were<br />

cases that should have been subject to British consular jurisdiction. It is also important to note<br />

that, like Levy, the vast majority of people with access to British jurisdiction in Essaouira at this<br />

time were Jewish. 137 This makes it likely that a significant number of those bribing Levy to<br />

bring their cases to Islamic courts were Jews.<br />

135<br />

FO 635/4, p. 32a-b, 11 April 1872 and FO, 631/5, Carstensen to Hay, 26 April 1872.<br />

136<br />

FO, 631/5, Carstensen to Hay, 13 March 1873. Presumably this letter refers to an incident before April 1872,<br />

when Levy was dismissed from his post.<br />

137<br />

Though there were some British subjects (merchants, ship captains, and sailors) as well as some Muslim<br />

protégés, these were far outnumbered by the many Jewish merchants who had obtained British protection: Schroeter,<br />

Merchants of Essaouira, especially Chapter 3.<br />

326

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!