20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

claimed that Emsellem had no right to the property in question. Instead, the Ibn Masar family<br />

had rented the store to Salomon Roffé, a Jewish American protégé. Roffé was in possession of<br />

documents drawn up before ‘udūl and signed by a qāḍī testifying to his having leased the<br />

property. It was thus Roffé, not Emsellem, who leased the store to Benhaim. Benhaim had<br />

ceased paying rent to Emsellem and had begun paying rent exclusively to Roffé on the order of<br />

the nāẓir. 110<br />

The confusion arose because Emsellem’s claim to the property was based on documents<br />

drawn up according to Jewish law in a beit din. Emsellem had previously gone to the qāḍī in an<br />

attempt to collect the rent he felt was due to him—probably because he was aware that property-<br />

related cases fell exclusively under Islamic jurisdiction. As proof of his claim, Emsellem had<br />

shown the Hebrew legal documents—which supposedly gave him the right to lease the property<br />

in question—to the qāḍī. He claimed that his father had purchased the right to lease the property<br />

(referred to as “the keys” to the property) from another Jew, who himself had purchased this<br />

right from a Jew. 111 It is likely that the right to lease in question was a ḥazaqah, a legal<br />

arrangement that existed exclusively in Jewish law by which Jews purchased the right to inhabit<br />

a property separately from the property itself (discussed in Chapter Three). However, legal<br />

documents drawn up according to Jewish law were not recognized by Islamic law: “…the nāẓir<br />

declared that these purchases are not valid, since they are not based—as they should be—on a<br />

contract in Arabic between the owners of the mosque and the first holder [of the lease].” 112 It is<br />

interesting that Emsellem even attempted to use documents drawn up by sofrim as evidence in a<br />

110<br />

It is not clear why Benhaim would have contracted subleases with both Roffé and Emsellem, or why he was<br />

paying both Jews rent. Unfortunately, the sources do not elucidate this matter further.<br />

111<br />

“Il déclare posséder des papiers, également en hébreu, prouvant que son père a acheté la clef à un israélite, lequel<br />

l’avait acheté à un autre israélite” (ibid.).<br />

112<br />

MAE Nantes, Tanger B 461, Belgian consul to Saint René Taillandier, 19 November 1904.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!