20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

traveled to Casablanca and “slaughtered” (dhabaḥū) an animal before the Christians there (most<br />

likely the consular officials). Slaughtering an animal on a person’s doorstep was a way of<br />

obligating that person to protect the one who made the sacrifice. These Demnati Jews almost<br />

certainly performed this ritual hoping to gain European protection. 124 The document went on to<br />

describe these rebellious Jews as being involved in issues that were none of their business,<br />

engaging in insolent behavior, and having “transgressed the limits of the laws that had been<br />

contracted with their ancestors permanently [regarding] their governor (ta‘addaw al-ḥudūda fī ’l-<br />

qawānīni al-ma‘hūdati li-aslāfihim ‘alā al-dawāmi ma‘a ‘āmilihim).” It seems that these Jews<br />

had appealed to the consular officials to intercede against their governor, even though they were<br />

the ones guilty of transgressing the law.<br />

The following November, the Jews of Demnat again complained about their<br />

coreligionists, this time accusing them of having thrown stones at Muslims and attacking a<br />

fellow Jew. The Jewish petitioners brought their story to the qā’id al-Jilālī al-Dimnātī,<br />

explaining that these misbehaving Jews had received letters from Jews elsewhere in the country<br />

who claimed to have done similar things without being punished. Given the short amount of<br />

time elapsed between the two documents, it seems likely that the group of insolent Jews who<br />

went to Casablanca were the same ones later accused of mistreating their Muslim neighbors.<br />

These Jews might have acquired a sense of invincibility from their newfound association with<br />

124<br />

Slaughtering an animal at the doorstep of someone’s house was a widespread ritual which invoked ‘ār (best<br />

translated as shame) on a given party if he did not fulfill one’s request: Kenneth Brown, “The ‘Curse’ of<br />

Westermarck,” Acta Philosofica Fennica 34 (1982). It was not unknown for Moroccans to invoke ‘ār with<br />

Europeans, particularly consuls, in an attempt to gain consular protection. See, e.g., FO, 174/221, Diary of the<br />

British Consulate in Tangier, pp. 49-50, 23 August 1849.<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!