20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Following this escalation of violence, the sultan’s intervention was requested—most<br />

likely by the Jewish leaders of Marrakesh. Mawlāy Ḥasan sent his representative Muḥammad al-<br />

Hādī b. ‘Abd al-Nabī al-Fāsī to Marrakesh, armed with letters and instructions to investigate the<br />

matter and settle the various claims. 63 Two months after the incident occurred, al-Fāsī wrote to<br />

the sultan from Marrakesh explaining that he had successfully brokered a settlement among the<br />

Jews and the pasha Amālik. The Jews agreed to sign releases retracting their complaint against<br />

the three Aḥmarīs and testified accordingly before Amālik and the qā’id Ibn Dawūd. Then they<br />

presented documents signed by sofrim and translated into Arabic, saying they would settle the<br />

claims of the seven Jews arrested with their own Jewish judges (yet another instance of Jewish<br />

legal documents being accepted as evidence in Makhzan courts). 64 Al-Fāsī kept everyone—<br />

Zaydān, the three Aḥmarīs, and the seven Jews—in prison until further orders from the sultan,<br />

though this was a formality; in essence, the claims had been addressed.<br />

Yet the sultan decided that some cases could not be left to Makhzan officials to resolve<br />

on site and required him to personally settle the matter. In these instances the sultan had the<br />

individuals involved sent to him. In order to resolve complaints about the brawl in Casablanca<br />

with which this chapter began, Mawlāy Ḥasan ordered the qā’id ‘Abdallāh al-Ḥaṣār to send the<br />

Jewish prisoners to him for questioning. 65<br />

Despite the centrality of the sultan to the system of judicial appeals, the sultan’s direct<br />

intervention was not always necessary. For instance, in 1890 a petition from the Jews of Ūrīka,<br />

near Marrakesh, reached the Ministry of Complaints. 66 The Jews claimed that their khalīfa had<br />

63<br />

It is not clear exactly what position Muḥammad al-Hādī held; he is not found in Ma‘lamāt al-Maghrib.<br />

64<br />

Al-Fāsī referred to the sofrim as “their ‘udūl” (DAR, Marrakesh, 24807, Muḥammad al-Hādī b. ‘Abd al-Nabī al-<br />

Fāsī to Mawlāy Ḥasan, 20 Ṣafar 1309).<br />

65<br />

DAR, Yahūd, 34155, Ḥājj ‘Abdallāh Ḥaṣār to Muḥammad Bargāsh, 16 Jumādā I 1294.<br />

66<br />

BH, K 171, p. 115, 1 Dhū al-Ḥijja 1307. It is not clear whether this petition came from the town of Ūrika or the<br />

region of the same name (in which the largest Jewish population resided in a town called Amizmiz); see Daniel J.<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!