20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Makhzan similarly referred to the dhimma pact in addressing the complaints of Jews.<br />

In one letter from 1892, the minister of foreign affairs, Muḥammad Gharrīṭ, addressed the Jews<br />

of Marrakesh, who had complained about their qā’id’s treatment of them. Gharrīt noted that the<br />

sultan was displeased to hear that his appointed official was mistreating Jews, since the Jews are<br />

under his protection (ahl dhimmatihi) and among his subjects (wa-min ra‘īyatihi). 29 In another<br />

letter from 1892, Mawlāy Ḥasan affirmed that Jews have certain rights as dhimmīs—in this case,<br />

the right to appeal to Islamic legal authorities. The sultan reiterated that these rights were tied to<br />

the Jews’ obligation to fulfill their part of the dhimma contract:<br />

[They have the aforementioned rights on condition that they fulfill] the obligations they<br />

had from before, which are conditions of their dhimma [status] and the treaties [we have<br />

with them] (ma‘a luzūmihim mā kānū ‘alayhi qadīman alladhī huwa sharṭun fī<br />

dhimmatihim wa-mu‘āhadatihim)—namely, not raising their voices, or screaming a lot,<br />

or spitting, or wearing shoes in places where they are not allowed to wear them, [as well<br />

as] paying the debts they owe ... and paying their taxes. 30<br />

The stipulation that Jews must pay “their taxes” probably refers to the jizya, an obligation<br />

mentioned in the Quran. 31 The agreement not to raise their voices echoes a provision in the Pact<br />

of ‘Umar in which dhimmīs consent not to “raise our voices…when in the presence of<br />

Muslims.” 32 Islamic law did not ubiquitously require non-Muslims to go barefoot in certain<br />

places but this provision was often customary in Morocco. 33 (I have not found any precedent for<br />

a prohibition on spitting.) Not only did Mawlāy Ḥasan clearly spell out the provisions for Jews’<br />

legal rights, he specifically linked these rights to their observance of the dhimma contract.<br />

29<br />

DAR, Yahūd, 18152, Muḥammad Mufaḍḍal Gharrīṭ to Jews of Marrakesh, 7 Jumādā II 1310. See also DAR,<br />

Yahūd, 15118, Mawlāy Ḥasan to Muḥammad Bargāsh, 22 Jumādā II 1297.<br />

30<br />

DAR, Fez, al-‘Arabī wuld Abī Muḥammad to Mawlāy Ḥasan, 4 Sha‘bān 1301. Although al-‘Arabī was actually<br />

the author, it is clear from the context that in this section he was simply repeating what Mawlāy Ḥasan wrote to him<br />

in an earlier letter—thus it is safe to assume that these words were in fact those of the sultan.<br />

31<br />

Quran 9:29. It is also possible that this clause is more general, meaning that Jews were required to pay all the<br />

taxes they owed—including the jizya.<br />

32<br />

This quotation is taken from the widely used text found in al-Ṭurṭūshī, Sirāj al-Mulūk, translated in Stillman, The<br />

Jews of Arab Lands, 157-58.<br />

33<br />

For a nuanced account of how this restriction was actually applied, see Gottreich, The Mellah of Marrakesh, 94-6.<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!