20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A more formidable obstacle to settlement occurred when the criminals or recalcitrant<br />

debtors resided in regions which did not submit to the Makhzan’s authority (most notably by<br />

refusing to pay any taxes). These regions were were considered guilty of “corruption” (fasād).<br />

This was most problematic in settling theft cases, since many Jews were robbed in regions<br />

beyond the sultan’s control. 133 In an entry from February 8, 1892, the Jew Shmūyil b. Ṭāṭā<br />

complained that he was robbed by the Awlād Bū Ziyān. 134 The Makhzan official responsible for<br />

this area said that he attempted to force the tribe to pay an indemnity, but they refused due to<br />

their “corruption” (li-fasādihim), meaning disobedience to the sultan. 135 In another instance, the<br />

Jewish victim, Ibn al-Fāsī, complained that he was robbed of 130 riyāls by the al-Rusūl tribe. 136<br />

The Makhzan official noted that the tribe was “corrupt” and that he had warned Ibn al-Fāsī not to<br />

travel in their region—a warning Ibn al-Fāsī ignored. This case shows that Jews sometimes<br />

traveled to insecure places knowing the risks, and yet nonetheless appealed to the Makhzan for<br />

redress when they were robbed in these areas. 137 Ultimately, if the perpetrators of a crime lived<br />

in a region guilty of corruption, there was little the Makhzan could do to secure an indemnity for<br />

the victims.<br />

133<br />

Nonetheless, this also occurred in some debt cases: see, e.g., BH, K 181, p. 252, 4 Ṣafar 1310 and p. 315, 28<br />

Jumādā I 1310. Other entries did not specify that the corruption of the debtors caused them to ignore the Makhzan’s<br />

instructions, but nonetheless reported that the debtors absolutely refused to cooperate in reaching a settlement: BH,<br />

K 157, p. 140, 17 Jumādā I 1307 and BH, K 181, p. 271, 16 Rabī‘ I 1310. See also DAR, Fez, ‘Abdallāh b. Aḥmad<br />

to Mawlāy Ḥasan, 13 Shawwāl 1301. In this case ‘Abdallāh reported about money owed to some unnamed Jews by<br />

the Zarāhina (a tribe from Zerhoun). ‘Abdallāh explained that one of the shaykhs of the tribe, who had promised to<br />

pay the debt, was two-faced, claiming to obey the Makhzan while inciting his tribe to rebellion.<br />

134<br />

BH, K 181, p. 110, 9 Rajab 1309.<br />

135<br />

For a similar case, see also BH, K 181, p. 368, 24 Ramaḍān 1310.<br />

136<br />

BH, K 157, p. 144, 25 Jumādā I 1307.<br />

137<br />

See also BH, K 181, p. 50, 30 Rabī‘ I 1309, in which Jews ignored the warning to travel only on the main road.<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!