20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

woman in nineteenth-century Morocco. Perhaps a more likely explanation is that Esther came<br />

from an influential and wealthy family and was robbed of precious possessions while traveling<br />

on Morocco’s notoriously dangerous roads.<br />

Cases concerning Jews who were murdered are the least common among the entries in<br />

the Ministry of Complaints registers (forty-two cases, or about 8% of the total). Islamic law<br />

treats murder cases much like theft cases; only the relatives of the deceased (and not the state)<br />

can prosecute the murderers. Murder cases are settled with the payment of blood money (diya)<br />

or retribution killing. 41 Although theoretically the murderers were responsible for paying the<br />

blood money, there is evidence that Makhzan officials sometimes paid murder indemnities out of<br />

their own pockets and only later tried to recover the cost from the murderers themselves. 42 Most<br />

schools of Islamic law, including the Mālikī school, do not permit retribution killing for a<br />

dhimmī killed by a Muslim. 43 Jews’ appeals to the Makhzan concerning murder cases thus only<br />

sought blood money. Additionally, most schools rule that the relatives of the murdered dhimmī<br />

can claim only half the blood money which would be paid for a murdered Muslim. 44 Since<br />

amounts of blood money are not given consistently in the Ministry of Complaints registers, it is<br />

difficult to know the extent to which this principle was observed. Moreover, in those instances<br />

41 Schacht, An Introduction to Islamic Law, 181-87. The private nature of murder crimes also governed their<br />

treatment in the Ottoman Empire: Heyd, Studies in Old Ottoman Criminal Law, 309: Hickok, “Homicide in Ottoman<br />

Bosnia,” 47-48. Hickok notes that after the eighteenth century reforms gave the state the right to investigate<br />

murders, but before these reforms took effect the governor’s only possibility for involvement was declaring a<br />

murder case to be brigandage, over which he had jurisdiction. For a Jewish legal discussion from Meknes<br />

concerning which relatives can collect the blood money from a murdered Jew, see NLI, Ms. B861 (8=5165-6), p.<br />

173a, Adar 5641/ February 1881, signed by Rafael Ibn Tzur and Ya‘aqov Berdugo.<br />

42 DAR, Yahūd, ‘Abd al-Ṣādiq b. Aḥmad to Mawlāy Ḥasan, Rabī‘ I 1298.<br />

43 Fattal, Statut légal, 116-18. The only school which permits retaliation killing for dhimmīs is the Ḥanafī school.<br />

Fattal notes that Mālik did permit the murderer of a dhimmī to be killed as punishment, however this does not seem<br />

to be the dominant view of the Mālikī school.<br />

44 Ibid., 116-18.<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!