20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actively upholding justice in Morocco, especially for its Jewish subjects. Foreigners were highly<br />

critical of the functioning of justice in Morocco during the nineteenth century, as we have seen<br />

(and will discuss further in Chapter Nine). Letters dating from Mawlāy Ḥasan’s rule explicitly<br />

invoke the role of the Ministry of Complaints in addressing the concerns of foreign officials. In<br />

January 1881, Muḥammad Bargāsh, the foreign minister, wrote a collective letters to the foreign<br />

ambassadors in Tangier concerning their alarm about fourteen murders of Jews in recent<br />

months. 70 Bargāsh explained that the sultan was worried about his subjects’ claims of<br />

mistreatment (maẓālim), and that in order to address their appeals, “he had appointed a special<br />

minister to [address] their claims…and that anyone who brought a complaint to the sultan would<br />

[have his complaint] addressed according to justice and the law.” 71 This letter almost certainly<br />

referred to the Minister of Complaints whom the sultan had already appointed (rather than a new<br />

position he had created). 72 It was intended to inform the foreign ambassadors about the ministry<br />

as a way to convince them that justice—especially for the murdered Jews—would be done.<br />

Admittedly this letter, and others like it, are from at least a decade after the founding of the<br />

ministry, and it is possible that the reasoning they cite for the appointment of a minister to hear<br />

the appeals of Moroccan subjects had nothing to do with Muḥammad IV’s decision to create a<br />

Ministry of Complaints. Nonetheless, given that the kinds of concerns they address were already<br />

present in the 1860’s, it seems more likely that the motivations expressed during Mawlāy<br />

Ḥasan’s reign were similar if not identical to those driving the reforms of Mawlāy Muḥammad.<br />

70<br />

DAR, Yahūd, 36069, Muḥammad Bargāsh to Ambassadors in Tangier, 6 Ṣafar 1298.<br />

71<br />

Kallafa bi-da‘āwīhim wazīran mustaqillan khāṣṣan…wa-anna kullu man rafa‘a shikāyatahu li-ḥaḍratihi al-<br />

‘āliyati bi-Llāhi tajrī ‘alā tarīqi al-ḥaqqi wa-’l-shar‘.<br />

72<br />

This is especially likely since Muḥammad Ṣaffār was the Minister of Complaints at the time and remained so until<br />

his death in the middle of Dhū al-Qa‘da 1298—ten months after this letter was written. See also DAR, Fez, 20647,<br />

Muḥammad al-Ṭūrīs to Muḥammad b. al-‘Arabī b. al-Mukhtār, 4 Jumādā II 1302; in this letter, concerning the<br />

French ambassador’s complaints about the treatment of a Moroccan subject, al-Ṭūrīs (Torres) conveys that the<br />

sultan “settled all [appeals] that came from his subjects, both Muslim and non-Muslim” (bi-annahu taqarrara lahu<br />

jamī‘a mā yaṣduru min ra‘yatihim al-muslimati wa-’l-ghayri muslimati).<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!