IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
20.04.2013 Views

Justice) and wizārat al-maẓālim (the Ministry of maẓālim, a term discussed shortly). 53 The ministry had a rather short history—it was created between 1859 and 1873 and was abolished under the French Protectorate in 1912—which is perhaps why scholars have largely ignored it. 54 In order to understand the ways in which Jews appealed to the Ministry of Complaints, it is first necessary to trace the origins of this institution and how it functioned. The Ministry of Complaints had much in common with the maẓālim courts which were a feature of many Islamic states since the ‘Abbāsid period. 55 Maẓālim (singular maẓlima) refers to 53 The only discussion of the Ministry of Complaints is a paper by Wilfred Rollman delivered at the Middle East Studies Association annual meeting in November 2008 entitled “The Ministry of Complaints and the Administration of Justice in Pre-Colonial Morocco.” Rollman’s study focuses on refuting claims made by Michaux Bellaire about this institution (in Edouard Michaux Bellaire, “Un rouage du gouvernement marocain ; la beniqat ech chikaïat de Moulay Abd el Hafid,” Révue du Monde Musulman 5, no. 6 (1908)), and does not seek to write a general history of the institution. I am deeply grateful to Professor Rollman both for alerting me to the existence of the Ministry of Complaints registers at the Bibliothèque Hassaniya in Rabat and for sharing his paper with me. Other than Michaux Bellaire’s article, there are few contemporary accounts of this ministry. Al-Nāṣirī does not mention the institution in his Kitāb al-istiqṣā. Ibn Zaydān mentions it only briefly: Ibn Zaydān, Itḥāf a‘lām al-nās, v. 2, 513, 16 and v. 3, 69 and idem, Al-‘Izz wa-’l-ṣawla fī ma‘ālim naẓm al-dawla, 2 vols. (Rabat: al-Maṭba‘a al-Mālikīya, 1961), v. 2, 50-54, in which he includes some examples from the Ministry of Complaints records (from 1311 AH). Aubin seems to have thought that the Minister of Complaints was responsible only (or primarily) for complaints submitted by Makhzan officials (Aubin, Morocco of To-Day, 165). See also al-Ḥasan b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Yamānī Bū ‘Ishrīn, al- Tanbīh al-Mu‘rib ‘ammā ‘alayhi al-ān ḥāl al-Maghrib (Rabat: Dār nashr al-ma‘rifa, 1994), 44-5. For mentions of the ministry in secondary literature, see Goulven, Traité d’économie, 22; Caillé, Organisation judiciaire, 18; Mohamed Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain à l’aube du XXe siècle (Rabat: Editions techniques nordafricaines, 1958), 173-81; al-Manūnī, Maẓāhir, v. 1, 43; Cabanis, “La justice du chrâa et la justice makhzen,” 60; Pennell, Morocco since 1830, 79. Lahbabi is the only scholar to devote more than a few sentences to the institution, though most of his analysis is about al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim and the little he says about the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints is, I believe, misleading. Cabanis mistakenly states that the Ministry of Complaints disappeared after Mawlāy Ḥasan’s reign. Pennell inexplicably writes that Mawlāy Ḥasan founded this ministry; I have found no evidence to support this. 54 I have found no precise date for the founding of this ministry. 55 On the maẓālim courts, see H. F. Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction in the Aḥkām Sulṭāniyya of Māwardī,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1911): Emile Tyan, Histoire de l’organisation judiciaire en pays d’Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1960), 433-525: Jorgen S. Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State; Maẓālim under the Baḥrī Mamlūks, 662/1264-789/1387 (Leiden: Brill, 1985): idem, “Maẓālim,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003). Although classical Islamic sources trace maẓālim courts back to the time of the Prophet, Nielsen concludes that we do not have firm evidence of their existence in Islamic states before the ‘Abbāsid period. On the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun (which functioned as the equivalent of a maẓālim court), see Heyd, Studies in Old Ottoman Criminal Law, 227; Eyal Ginio, “Coping with the State’s Agents ‘From Below’: Petitions, Legal Appeal, and the Sultan’s Justice in Ottoman Legal Practice,” in Popular Protest and Political Participation in the Ottoman Empire: Studies in Honor of Suraiya Faroqhi, ed. Eleni Gara, M. Erdem Kabadayi, and Christoph K. Neumann (Istanbul: Bilgi İletişim GrubuYayincilik Müzik Yapim ve Haber Ajansi Ltd., 2011). On women’s petitions to the divan-ı hümayun see Fariba Zarinebaf, “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman Istanbul in the Late Seventeenth Century,” in Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History, ed. Amira El Azhary Sonbol (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996). See also Ursinus, Şikayet in an Ottoman Province, esp. 18, 23, 166

an injustice or an act of oppression. The maẓālim courts were audiences during which the ruling authorities (either the caliph or sultan himself, or one of his designated ministers) heard complaints from subjects on a range of matters. The functioning of maẓālim courts was theorized most famously by ‘Alī b. Muḥammad al-Māwardī (d. 1058) in his al-Aḥkām al- sulṭānīya. 56 However, scholars have convincingly argued that al-Māwardī’s theories were largely descriptive of an ideal which was not always realized in the actual functioning of these courts. 57 Rather, the term maẓālim covers a broad range of ways in which states responded to the obligation to ensure justice by opening avenues of direct appeal to the highest authority. I am thus not particularly interested in seeing to what extent the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints matched up with al-Māwardī’s ideal type, since it is clear that each state organized maẓālim courts quite differently. 58 Yet in invoking the term maẓālim, Morocco’s administrators undoubtedly had the history of this institution in mind, though probably in its more general sense of “the personal intervention of the sovereign (or his vizier).” 59 Nonetheless, there is no question that the kind of justice dispensed in maẓālim courts—as well as by the Ministry of Complaints—was quite different from that of the qāḍīs. Whereas which describes the existence of a localized divan-ı hümayun which heard şikayet for the province of Rumelia. On dhimmīs’ use of the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun, see Wittmann, “Before Qadi and Vizier,” Chapters 2 and 3. Although the divan-ı hümayun dwindled into insignificance in the eighteenth century (Bernard Lewis, “Dīwān-i Humāyūn,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003)), the central government continued to receive and address petitions until the dissolution of the empire: see Yuval Ben-Bassat, “In Search of Justice: Petitions Sent from Palestine to Istanbul from the 1870’s Onwards,” Turcica 41 (2009); idem, “‘Al ṭelegraf vetzedeq : ha-petitziot shel toshavei Yafo ve-‘Azah le-vazir ha-gadol be-Istanbul,” Ha-Mizraḥ he-Ḥadash 49 (2010); Nora Lafi, “Petitions and Accommodating Urban Change in the Ottoman Empire,” in Istanbul as seen from a distance: Centre and Provinces in the Ottoman Empire, ed. Elisabeth Özdalga, M. Sait Özervarlı, and Feryal Tansuğ (Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2011). 56 For a summary of al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim courts, see Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction.” 57 See especially Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State, 17, 31. See also Wittmann, “Before Qadi and Vizier,” 141. 58 Mohamed Lahbabi is particularly concerned with comparing the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints to al-Māwardī, which is perhaps why he draws the rather strange and misleading conclusions that he does (in particular that the Ministry of Complaints did not serve a judicial role at all and was strictly administrative): see Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain, 177. It is also possible that Lahbabi simply did not have access to the same registers which I examined; although he refers to the “Archives du ministère” he does not cite any sources. 59 Stern, “Three Petitions of the Fatimid Period,” 187. 167

Justice) and wizārat al-maẓālim (the Ministry of maẓālim, a term discussed shortly). 53 The<br />

ministry had a rather short history—it was created between 1859 and 1873 and was abolished<br />

under the French Protectorate in 1912—which is perhaps why scholars have largely ignored it. 54<br />

In order to understand the ways in which Jews appealed to the Ministry of Complaints, it is first<br />

necessary to trace the origins of this institution and how it functioned.<br />

The Ministry of Complaints had much in common with the maẓālim courts which were a<br />

feature of many Islamic states since the ‘Abbāsid period. 55 Maẓālim (singular maẓlima) refers to<br />

53<br />

The only discussion of the Ministry of Complaints is a paper by Wilfred Rollman delivered at the Middle East<br />

Studies Association annual meeting in November 2008 entitled “The Ministry of Complaints and the Administration<br />

of Justice in Pre-Colonial Morocco.” Rollman’s study focuses on refuting claims made by Michaux Bellaire about<br />

this institution (in Edouard Michaux Bellaire, “Un rouage du gouvernement marocain ; la beniqat ech chikaïat de<br />

Moulay Abd el Hafid,” Révue du Monde Musulman 5, no. 6 (1908)), and does not seek to write a general history of<br />

the institution. I am deeply grateful to Professor Rollman both for alerting me to the existence of the Ministry of<br />

Complaints registers at the Bibliothèque Hassaniya in Rabat and for sharing his paper with me. Other than Michaux<br />

Bellaire’s article, there are few contemporary accounts of this ministry. Al-Nāṣirī does not mention the institution in<br />

his Kitāb al-istiqṣā. Ibn Zaydān mentions it only briefly: Ibn Zaydān, Itḥāf a‘lām al-nās, v. 2, 513, 16 and v. 3, 69<br />

and idem, Al-‘Izz wa-’l-ṣawla fī ma‘ālim naẓm al-dawla, 2 vols. (Rabat: al-Maṭba‘a al-Mālikīya, 1961), v. 2, 50-54,<br />

in which he includes some examples from the Ministry of Complaints records (from 1311 AH). Aubin seems to<br />

have thought that the Minister of Complaints was responsible only (or primarily) for complaints submitted by<br />

Makhzan officials (Aubin, Morocco of To-Day, 165). See also al-Ḥasan b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Yamānī Bū ‘Ishrīn, al-<br />

Tanbīh al-Mu‘rib ‘ammā ‘alayhi al-ān ḥāl al-Maghrib (Rabat: Dār nashr al-ma‘rifa, 1994), 44-5. For mentions of<br />

the ministry in secondary literature, see Goulven, Traité d’économie, 22; Caillé, Organisation judiciaire, 18;<br />

Mohamed Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain à l’aube du XXe siècle (Rabat: Editions techniques nordafricaines,<br />

1958), 173-81; al-Manūnī, Maẓāhir, v. 1, 43; Cabanis, “La justice du chrâa et la justice makhzen,” 60; Pennell,<br />

Morocco since 1830, 79. Lahbabi is the only scholar to devote more than a few sentences to the institution, though<br />

most of his analysis is about al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim and the little he says about the Moroccan Ministry of<br />

Complaints is, I believe, misleading. Cabanis mistakenly states that the Ministry of Complaints disappeared after<br />

Mawlāy Ḥasan’s reign. Pennell inexplicably writes that Mawlāy Ḥasan founded this ministry; I have found no<br />

evidence to support this.<br />

54<br />

I have found no precise date for the founding of this ministry.<br />

55<br />

On the maẓālim courts, see H. F. Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction in the Aḥkām Sulṭāniyya of Māwardī,”<br />

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1911): Emile Tyan, Histoire de l’organisation judiciaire en pays d’Islam<br />

(Leiden: Brill, 1960), 433-525: Jorgen S. Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State; Maẓālim under the Baḥrī<br />

Mamlūks, 662/1264-789/1387 (Leiden: Brill, 1985): idem, “Maẓālim,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et<br />

al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003). Although classical Islamic sources trace maẓālim courts back to the time of the Prophet,<br />

Nielsen concludes that we do not have firm evidence of their existence in Islamic states before the ‘Abbāsid period.<br />

On the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun (which functioned as the equivalent of a maẓālim court), see Heyd, Studies in Old<br />

Ottoman Criminal Law, 227; Eyal Ginio, “Coping with the State’s Agents ‘From Below’: Petitions, Legal Appeal,<br />

and the Sultan’s Justice in Ottoman Legal Practice,” in Popular Protest and Political Participation in the Ottoman<br />

Empire: Studies in Honor of Suraiya Faroqhi, ed. Eleni Gara, M. Erdem Kabadayi, and Christoph K. Neumann<br />

(Istanbul: Bilgi İletişim GrubuYayincilik Müzik Yapim ve Haber Ajansi Ltd., 2011). On women’s petitions to the<br />

divan-ı hümayun see Fariba Zarinebaf, “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman Istanbul in the Late<br />

Seventeenth Century,” in Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History, ed. Amira El Azhary Sonbol<br />

(Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996). See also Ursinus, Şikayet in an Ottoman Province, esp. 18, 23,<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!