IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
Justice) and wizārat al-maẓālim (the Ministry of maẓālim, a term discussed shortly). 53 The ministry had a rather short history—it was created between 1859 and 1873 and was abolished under the French Protectorate in 1912—which is perhaps why scholars have largely ignored it. 54 In order to understand the ways in which Jews appealed to the Ministry of Complaints, it is first necessary to trace the origins of this institution and how it functioned. The Ministry of Complaints had much in common with the maẓālim courts which were a feature of many Islamic states since the ‘Abbāsid period. 55 Maẓālim (singular maẓlima) refers to 53 The only discussion of the Ministry of Complaints is a paper by Wilfred Rollman delivered at the Middle East Studies Association annual meeting in November 2008 entitled “The Ministry of Complaints and the Administration of Justice in Pre-Colonial Morocco.” Rollman’s study focuses on refuting claims made by Michaux Bellaire about this institution (in Edouard Michaux Bellaire, “Un rouage du gouvernement marocain ; la beniqat ech chikaïat de Moulay Abd el Hafid,” Révue du Monde Musulman 5, no. 6 (1908)), and does not seek to write a general history of the institution. I am deeply grateful to Professor Rollman both for alerting me to the existence of the Ministry of Complaints registers at the Bibliothèque Hassaniya in Rabat and for sharing his paper with me. Other than Michaux Bellaire’s article, there are few contemporary accounts of this ministry. Al-Nāṣirī does not mention the institution in his Kitāb al-istiqṣā. Ibn Zaydān mentions it only briefly: Ibn Zaydān, Itḥāf a‘lām al-nās, v. 2, 513, 16 and v. 3, 69 and idem, Al-‘Izz wa-’l-ṣawla fī ma‘ālim naẓm al-dawla, 2 vols. (Rabat: al-Maṭba‘a al-Mālikīya, 1961), v. 2, 50-54, in which he includes some examples from the Ministry of Complaints records (from 1311 AH). Aubin seems to have thought that the Minister of Complaints was responsible only (or primarily) for complaints submitted by Makhzan officials (Aubin, Morocco of To-Day, 165). See also al-Ḥasan b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Yamānī Bū ‘Ishrīn, al- Tanbīh al-Mu‘rib ‘ammā ‘alayhi al-ān ḥāl al-Maghrib (Rabat: Dār nashr al-ma‘rifa, 1994), 44-5. For mentions of the ministry in secondary literature, see Goulven, Traité d’économie, 22; Caillé, Organisation judiciaire, 18; Mohamed Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain à l’aube du XXe siècle (Rabat: Editions techniques nordafricaines, 1958), 173-81; al-Manūnī, Maẓāhir, v. 1, 43; Cabanis, “La justice du chrâa et la justice makhzen,” 60; Pennell, Morocco since 1830, 79. Lahbabi is the only scholar to devote more than a few sentences to the institution, though most of his analysis is about al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim and the little he says about the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints is, I believe, misleading. Cabanis mistakenly states that the Ministry of Complaints disappeared after Mawlāy Ḥasan’s reign. Pennell inexplicably writes that Mawlāy Ḥasan founded this ministry; I have found no evidence to support this. 54 I have found no precise date for the founding of this ministry. 55 On the maẓālim courts, see H. F. Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction in the Aḥkām Sulṭāniyya of Māwardī,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1911): Emile Tyan, Histoire de l’organisation judiciaire en pays d’Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1960), 433-525: Jorgen S. Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State; Maẓālim under the Baḥrī Mamlūks, 662/1264-789/1387 (Leiden: Brill, 1985): idem, “Maẓālim,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003). Although classical Islamic sources trace maẓālim courts back to the time of the Prophet, Nielsen concludes that we do not have firm evidence of their existence in Islamic states before the ‘Abbāsid period. On the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun (which functioned as the equivalent of a maẓālim court), see Heyd, Studies in Old Ottoman Criminal Law, 227; Eyal Ginio, “Coping with the State’s Agents ‘From Below’: Petitions, Legal Appeal, and the Sultan’s Justice in Ottoman Legal Practice,” in Popular Protest and Political Participation in the Ottoman Empire: Studies in Honor of Suraiya Faroqhi, ed. Eleni Gara, M. Erdem Kabadayi, and Christoph K. Neumann (Istanbul: Bilgi İletişim GrubuYayincilik Müzik Yapim ve Haber Ajansi Ltd., 2011). On women’s petitions to the divan-ı hümayun see Fariba Zarinebaf, “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman Istanbul in the Late Seventeenth Century,” in Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History, ed. Amira El Azhary Sonbol (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996). See also Ursinus, Şikayet in an Ottoman Province, esp. 18, 23, 166
an injustice or an act of oppression. The maẓālim courts were audiences during which the ruling authorities (either the caliph or sultan himself, or one of his designated ministers) heard complaints from subjects on a range of matters. The functioning of maẓālim courts was theorized most famously by ‘Alī b. Muḥammad al-Māwardī (d. 1058) in his al-Aḥkām al- sulṭānīya. 56 However, scholars have convincingly argued that al-Māwardī’s theories were largely descriptive of an ideal which was not always realized in the actual functioning of these courts. 57 Rather, the term maẓālim covers a broad range of ways in which states responded to the obligation to ensure justice by opening avenues of direct appeal to the highest authority. I am thus not particularly interested in seeing to what extent the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints matched up with al-Māwardī’s ideal type, since it is clear that each state organized maẓālim courts quite differently. 58 Yet in invoking the term maẓālim, Morocco’s administrators undoubtedly had the history of this institution in mind, though probably in its more general sense of “the personal intervention of the sovereign (or his vizier).” 59 Nonetheless, there is no question that the kind of justice dispensed in maẓālim courts—as well as by the Ministry of Complaints—was quite different from that of the qāḍīs. Whereas which describes the existence of a localized divan-ı hümayun which heard şikayet for the province of Rumelia. On dhimmīs’ use of the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun, see Wittmann, “Before Qadi and Vizier,” Chapters 2 and 3. Although the divan-ı hümayun dwindled into insignificance in the eighteenth century (Bernard Lewis, “Dīwān-i Humāyūn,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003)), the central government continued to receive and address petitions until the dissolution of the empire: see Yuval Ben-Bassat, “In Search of Justice: Petitions Sent from Palestine to Istanbul from the 1870’s Onwards,” Turcica 41 (2009); idem, “‘Al ṭelegraf vetzedeq : ha-petitziot shel toshavei Yafo ve-‘Azah le-vazir ha-gadol be-Istanbul,” Ha-Mizraḥ he-Ḥadash 49 (2010); Nora Lafi, “Petitions and Accommodating Urban Change in the Ottoman Empire,” in Istanbul as seen from a distance: Centre and Provinces in the Ottoman Empire, ed. Elisabeth Özdalga, M. Sait Özervarlı, and Feryal Tansuğ (Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2011). 56 For a summary of al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim courts, see Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction.” 57 See especially Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State, 17, 31. See also Wittmann, “Before Qadi and Vizier,” 141. 58 Mohamed Lahbabi is particularly concerned with comparing the Moroccan Ministry of Complaints to al-Māwardī, which is perhaps why he draws the rather strange and misleading conclusions that he does (in particular that the Ministry of Complaints did not serve a judicial role at all and was strictly administrative): see Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain, 177. It is also possible that Lahbabi simply did not have access to the same registers which I examined; although he refers to the “Archives du ministère” he does not cite any sources. 59 Stern, “Three Petitions of the Fatimid Period,” 187. 167
- Page 125 and 126: In another instance of oath avoidan
- Page 127 and 128: Sharī‘a courts provided a crucia
- Page 129 and 130: agreement notarized according to Is
- Page 131 and 132: ability and desire to move among di
- Page 133 and 134: ‘udūl. 14 Most real estate trans
- Page 135 and 136: equire or benefit from adjudication
- Page 137 and 138: Simultaneous Use of Jewish and Isla
- Page 139 and 140: evidence from the nineteenth centur
- Page 141 and 142: to sue other Jews in sharī‘a cou
- Page 143 and 144: But what about intra-Jewish lawsuit
- Page 145 and 146: ut for the most part this is a here
- Page 147 and 148: the sum of three duoros per month.
- Page 149 and 150: only in Jewish law. This happened i
- Page 151 and 152: in the millāḥ of Marrakesh on Ap
- Page 153 and 154: aware of Jewish law and sometimes t
- Page 155 and 156: of a rabbi to determine the proper
- Page 157 and 158: ‘Aṭṭār, in order to find out
- Page 159 and 160: Muslims’ jurisdictional boundary
- Page 161 and 162: that they had successfully done so.
- Page 163 and 164: the Moroccan legal system more broa
- Page 165 and 166: translated as the territories under
- Page 167 and 168: elatively scant work on the legal h
- Page 169 and 170: law, even if they did not consisten
- Page 171 and 172: abrupt end after his death, as the
- Page 173 and 174: put it, “in all medieval Muslim s
- Page 175: about its image in the eyes of fore
- Page 179 and 180: In designing its new army, the Makh
- Page 181 and 182: The Ministry itself, although in co
- Page 183 and 184: Minister of Complaints, a man about
- Page 185 and 186: It is not entirely clear whether th
- Page 187 and 188: initial letters. 102 The convention
- Page 189 and 190: whether the sultan simply failed to
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter Five: Appeals to the Minist
- Page 193 and 194: Jews and the Ministry of Complaints
- Page 195 and 196: The nature of these sources prevent
- Page 197 and 198: Causes for Complaint Most of the ap
- Page 199 and 200: products (such as barley). 23 This,
- Page 201 and 202: appears numerous times). 29 While t
- Page 203 and 204: matter what their religious backgro
- Page 205 and 206: when amounts are specified they ten
- Page 207 and 208: cases which were ultimately settled
- Page 209 and 210: Jews who had been robbed. 62 The su
- Page 211 and 212: from July 28, 1892, a group of Jews
- Page 213 and 214: nature of sharī‘a courts. 83 In
- Page 215 and 216: legal proof of his claim. 91 It is
- Page 217 and 218: the Jewish victims were compensated
- Page 219 and 220: central government could only do so
- Page 221 and 222: and Muslim was responsible for arra
- Page 223 and 224: sometimes the Makhzan officials’
- Page 225 and 226: A more formidable obstacle to settl
Justice) and wizārat al-maẓālim (the Ministry of maẓālim, a term discussed shortly). 53 The<br />
ministry had a rather short history—it was created between 1859 and 1873 and was abolished<br />
under the French Protectorate in 1912—which is perhaps why scholars have largely ignored it. 54<br />
In order to understand the ways in which Jews appealed to the Ministry of Complaints, it is first<br />
necessary to trace the origins of this institution and how it functioned.<br />
The Ministry of Complaints had much in common with the maẓālim courts which were a<br />
feature of many Islamic states since the ‘Abbāsid period. 55 Maẓālim (singular maẓlima) refers to<br />
53<br />
The only discussion of the Ministry of Complaints is a paper by Wilfred Rollman delivered at the Middle East<br />
Studies Association annual meeting in November 2008 entitled “The Ministry of Complaints and the Administration<br />
of Justice in Pre-Colonial Morocco.” Rollman’s study focuses on refuting claims made by Michaux Bellaire about<br />
this institution (in Edouard Michaux Bellaire, “Un rouage du gouvernement marocain ; la beniqat ech chikaïat de<br />
Moulay Abd el Hafid,” Révue du Monde Musulman 5, no. 6 (1908)), and does not seek to write a general history of<br />
the institution. I am deeply grateful to Professor Rollman both for alerting me to the existence of the Ministry of<br />
Complaints registers at the Bibliothèque Hassaniya in Rabat and for sharing his paper with me. Other than Michaux<br />
Bellaire’s article, there are few contemporary accounts of this ministry. Al-Nāṣirī does not mention the institution in<br />
his Kitāb al-istiqṣā. Ibn Zaydān mentions it only briefly: Ibn Zaydān, Itḥāf a‘lām al-nās, v. 2, 513, 16 and v. 3, 69<br />
and idem, Al-‘Izz wa-’l-ṣawla fī ma‘ālim naẓm al-dawla, 2 vols. (Rabat: al-Maṭba‘a al-Mālikīya, 1961), v. 2, 50-54,<br />
in which he includes some examples from the Ministry of Complaints records (from 1311 AH). Aubin seems to<br />
have thought that the Minister of Complaints was responsible only (or primarily) for complaints submitted by<br />
Makhzan officials (Aubin, Morocco of To-Day, 165). See also al-Ḥasan b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Yamānī Bū ‘Ishrīn, al-<br />
Tanbīh al-Mu‘rib ‘ammā ‘alayhi al-ān ḥāl al-Maghrib (Rabat: Dār nashr al-ma‘rifa, 1994), 44-5. For mentions of<br />
the ministry in secondary literature, see Goulven, Traité d’économie, 22; Caillé, Organisation judiciaire, 18;<br />
Mohamed Lahbabi, Le gouvernement marocain à l’aube du XXe siècle (Rabat: Editions techniques nordafricaines,<br />
1958), 173-81; al-Manūnī, Maẓāhir, v. 1, 43; Cabanis, “La justice du chrâa et la justice makhzen,” 60; Pennell,<br />
Morocco since 1830, 79. Lahbabi is the only scholar to devote more than a few sentences to the institution, though<br />
most of his analysis is about al-Māwardī’s theory of maẓālim and the little he says about the Moroccan Ministry of<br />
Complaints is, I believe, misleading. Cabanis mistakenly states that the Ministry of Complaints disappeared after<br />
Mawlāy Ḥasan’s reign. Pennell inexplicably writes that Mawlāy Ḥasan founded this ministry; I have found no<br />
evidence to support this.<br />
54<br />
I have found no precise date for the founding of this ministry.<br />
55<br />
On the maẓālim courts, see H. F. Amedroz, “The Maẓālim Jurisdiction in the Aḥkām Sulṭāniyya of Māwardī,”<br />
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1911): Emile Tyan, Histoire de l’organisation judiciaire en pays d’Islam<br />
(Leiden: Brill, 1960), 433-525: Jorgen S. Nielsen, Secular Justice in an Islamic State; Maẓālim under the Baḥrī<br />
Mamlūks, 662/1264-789/1387 (Leiden: Brill, 1985): idem, “Maẓālim,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et<br />
al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003). Although classical Islamic sources trace maẓālim courts back to the time of the Prophet,<br />
Nielsen concludes that we do not have firm evidence of their existence in Islamic states before the ‘Abbāsid period.<br />
On the Ottoman divan-ı hümayun (which functioned as the equivalent of a maẓālim court), see Heyd, Studies in Old<br />
Ottoman Criminal Law, 227; Eyal Ginio, “Coping with the State’s Agents ‘From Below’: Petitions, Legal Appeal,<br />
and the Sultan’s Justice in Ottoman Legal Practice,” in Popular Protest and Political Participation in the Ottoman<br />
Empire: Studies in Honor of Suraiya Faroqhi, ed. Eleni Gara, M. Erdem Kabadayi, and Christoph K. Neumann<br />
(Istanbul: Bilgi İletişim GrubuYayincilik Müzik Yapim ve Haber Ajansi Ltd., 2011). On women’s petitions to the<br />
divan-ı hümayun see Fariba Zarinebaf, “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman Istanbul in the Late<br />
Seventeenth Century,” in Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History, ed. Amira El Azhary Sonbol<br />
(Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996). See also Ursinus, Şikayet in an Ottoman Province, esp. 18, 23,<br />
166