20.04.2013 Views

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Three: Crossing Jurisdictional Boundaries<br />

Shalom Assarraf passed away in the fall of 1917. As a prominent businessman, a savvy<br />

lawyer, a leader of his community, and—perhaps most important of all—the patriarch of a large<br />

and prosperous family, Shalom’s death almost certainly had an impact beyond the walls of Dar<br />

Assarraf, the familial abode. Practically, Shalom’s relatives had to sort out what was<br />

undoubtedly a large and fairly complex estate. Shalom was survived by three sons who,<br />

according to Jewish inheritance law, were his sole heirs. 1 The brothers divided up their late<br />

father’s estate so that each would get his fair share, and almost certainly had sofrim draw up a<br />

record of the ensuing settlement so that no one could dispute it in the future. 2 But the Assarraf<br />

brothers were not satisfied with this assurance of their agreement. After having notarized the<br />

division of inheritance in a beit din, Shalom’s sons also went to a sharī‘a court to record the<br />

settlement before ‘udūl. 3 For good measure they brought along one of the leading rabbis of Fez,<br />

who testified that the three brothers were Shalom’s only heirs according to Jewish law.<br />

Islamic law granted Jews the right to adjudicate succession according to Jewish law and<br />

without the interference of Islamic legal institutions. This meant that had the Assarraf brothers<br />

so desired, they could have had their inheritance settlement recorded in a Jewish court and left it<br />

at that—no need at all to go to a sharī‘a court. Yet the Assarraf heirs chose to have their<br />

1 Although I do not know if Shalom had daughters, Jewish law allows for all the inheritance to go to sons even if a<br />

man is survived by daughters (daughters only inherit if there are no sons); similarly, it is not clear if Shalom was<br />

survived by a wife (or wives), but in any case she would not have inherited (except the amount of her ketubbah,<br />

were that still unpaid). See Menachem Elon, “Succession,” in Encyclopaedia Judaica, ed. Fred Skolnik and<br />

Michael Berenbaum (Detroit: Macmillan Reference, 2007).<br />

2 I say “almost certainly” because I have not actually found a legal document drawn up in a beit din attesting to the<br />

division of Shalom’s estate. However, I have found many such documents for other families (see Chapter One), and<br />

venture to hazard an educated guess that given the importance of the estate, Shalom’s heirs would have done the<br />

same.<br />

3 TC, File #3, 5 Ṣafar 1336.<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!