IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ... IN THE COURTS OF THE NATIONS - DataSpace - Princeton ...
All of the sale contracts attested to transactions in which one of the Assarrafs bought something—almost always an animal—from a Muslim. 95 Mules were the most commonly traded beast, but there are also documents concerning the sale of cows, donkeys, and horses (surprising given that dhimmīs were not allowed to ride horses under Islamic law). 96 The descriptions of the animals usually includes their sex, color, and other identifying features. For instance, on May 23, 1871, Shalom bought a male mule from Jafār b. Muḥammad al-Dalīmī al- ‘Asharī for 150 mithqāls. 97 The mule was described as “red in color, five years old, with white under its hindquarters.” 98 Only two documents concern the sale of something other than animals; in one, Ya‘aqov bought a room from a Muslim. 99 In another, Shalom bought a knife for thirteen mithqāls. 100 However, the fact that the Assarrafs mostly bought animals from Muslims is not necessarily representative of broader patterns; in the other collections I examined, it was far more common for Jews to buy and sell property from Muslims than to acquire beasts of burden. 101 95 Of the sixteen sale contracts, thirteen were for animals. 96 See TC, File #8, 14 Sha‘bān 1297, in which Shalom bought a white, male horse from al-Ḥājj ‘Abd al-Raḥmān b. al-mu‘allam ‘Alī al-Sūsī for 157 mithqāls and five ūqīyas. See also TC, File #10, 2 Muḥarram 1323, in which the Jew Rafael b. Aharon al-Sukūrī bought a red work horse (birdhawn) from a Muslim. (I am grateful to Professor Michael Cook for this translation.) 97 TC, File #10, 3 Rabī‘ I 1288. 98 Aḥmaru al-lawni, rabā‘u al-sinni al-waqti [sic], bayāḍan [sic] taḥta ẓahrihi. Lane translates rabā‘ as “shedding its tooth called the rabā‘īya, q. v.; applied to the sheep or the goat in the fourth year, and to the bull and cow and the solid-hoofed animal in the fifth year, and to the camel in the seventh year” (Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon, 1018). I assume that a mule counts as a solid-hoofed animal, and thus rabā‘u al-sinn means that the mule in question is five years old. 99 TC, File #5, 6 Rajab 1303. 100 TC, File #2, 14 Jumādā II 1288. 101 For documents in which Jews bought or sold real estate from Muslims, see UL, Or.26.543 (1), 8 Rabī‘ I 12?? (Ḥaim Corcos, Marrakesh); UL, Or.26.543 (2), 14 Shawwāl 1331 (Yeshu‘a Corcos, on a long document including many other transactions of the same property); YBZ, 280, 30 Dhū al-Ḥijja 1302 (‘Azīzī b. David al-Dabdūwī, no city mentioned); PD, 30 Ṣafar 1274 (Makhlūf b. Shalom b. Ghazlān al-Ṣayrafī, Fez); PD, 20 Rabī‘ II 1266 (Ya‘aqov b. Avraham Sabbāgh, Fez); PD, 19 Ṣafar 1295 (Makhlūf b. Shalom b. Ghazlān al-Ṣayrafī, Fez); PD, 1317 (no further date: Avraham ha-Kohen, Tetuan); PD, 2 Rajab 1274 (Yeshu‘a b. Yehudah al-Lībī, Tetuan); PD, 8 Jumādā II 1271 (Ḥaim b. Shmuel, Fez). 96
Lease contracts, on the other hand, uniformly concerned real estate. In all the lease contracts found in the collection, the Assarrafs were the landlords renting property to Muslims— never the other way around. 102 Again, this is not representative of broader trends, since legal documents held in other collections preserve examples of Jews renting property from Muslims. 103 Most of the leases in the Assarraf collection were for the usufruct rights—that is, the right to occupy the property in question—to stores which belonged to a pious endowment (ḥubs or waqf). 104 The usufruct rights to a ḥubs property were owned separately from the property itself. There were a number of different kinds of usufruct titles, though the only one used in the Assarraf documents is zīna. 105 Specifically, one acquired a zīna on a ḥubs property by “filling the property with equipment, windows, or similarly useful accessories.” 106 Subsequently, the usufruct right was transferable, inheritable, and could be leased separately from a lease on the property itself. 107 (The zīna was not so different from the ḥazaqah in Jewish law, which I discuss further in the following chapter.) The Assarrafs owned the zīna of at least three different stores in the millāḥ of Fez, stores that belonged to a pious endowment. 108 The Assarrafs rented 102 The single rental contract in which a Jew was the tenant concerned Ḥaim b. Ya‘aqov Harosh, an associate of the Assarrafs; Ḥaim rented the usufruct rights (zīna) to a store from al-‘Isāwī b. al-‘Adal (TC, File #6, 4 Dhū al-Qa‘da 1320). 103 See, for instance, UL, Or.26.543 (1), 18 Rajab 1302 (in which Masān b. Harān, the agent of Yeshu‘a Corcos, rented part of a house in Marrakesh from the Muslim al-‘Abbās b. al-Mahdī al-Sharādī); Or.26.543 (2), 11 Rabī‘ II 1320 (in which ‘Akān b. Ḥaim Corcos rented a funduq from the Makhzan in Essaouira); PD, 30 Rabī ‘ II 1366 (in which Ya‘aqov b. Avraham Sabbāgh rented a room in Fez from a Muslim). 104 Eleven of the seventeen lease contracts were for the zīna of a store. 105 See Louis Milliot, Démembrements du Habous : menfa‘ā, gzā, guelsā, zīnā, istighrāq (Paris: Editions Ernest Leroux, 1918); on zīna in particular, see 57-59. See also G. Baer, “Ḥikr,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman, et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003); J. Abribat, “Essai sur les contrats de quasi-aliénation et de location perpétuelle auxquels l’institution du hobous à donné naissance,” Revue Algérienne et Tunisienne de Législation et de Jurisprudence 17 (1901). 106 “…garnir le local du matériel meublant, vitrines ou accessoires analogues utiles” (Milliot, Démembrements du Habous, 57). 107 Ibid., Chapter 1. 108 One was across from the Funduq al-Diwān, another was the second store on the left of the same funduq, and the last was the third store on the left of the same funduq. The first such lease contract is from 5 Muḥarram 1301 (TC, 97
- Page 55 and 56: went to batei din and sharī‘a co
- Page 57 and 58: school relevant for our purposes is
- Page 59 and 60: Jewish and Islamic legal systems re
- Page 61 and 62: ehind, a large number were undoubte
- Page 63 and 64: atei din generally, it does reflect
- Page 65 and 66: Jews used batei din not only as not
- Page 67 and 68: Jerusalem. 33 The collection consis
- Page 69 and 70: (azraqu al-‘aynayn)—a trait for
- Page 71 and 72: undoubtedly made much of their mone
- Page 73 and 74: preventing members of the community
- Page 75 and 76: ‘udūl. 76 These ‘udūl, whose
- Page 77 and 78: Eliyahu b. Ya'aqov Zohra bat Ya‘a
- Page 79 and 80: and Muḥammad would return the mon
- Page 81 and 82: Table 2.1 Types of Entries 2% 2% 2%
- Page 83 and 84: allegation or deposition in a case
- Page 85 and 86: court approximately once a week, ei
- Page 87 and 88: The introduction of the “protecti
- Page 89 and 90: ule; the ‘udūl almost always too
- Page 91 and 92: documents would stand up as evidenc
- Page 93 and 94: Empire. 49 A document in the Assarr
- Page 95 and 96: legal procedure was relatively mino
- Page 97 and 98: een optional as not all bills of de
- Page 99 and 100: Qa‘da 1309 (June 12, 1892), two
- Page 101 and 102: mostly meant extending credit on go
- Page 103 and 104: Other release documents specify tha
- Page 105: al-faqīh Aḥmad al-Filālī al-Ma
- Page 109 and 110: which was operated by Muslims durin
- Page 111 and 112: Shalom’s knowledge of Islamic law
- Page 113 and 114: elow). Although the majority of law
- Page 115 and 116: weeks after the plaintiff filed the
- Page 117 and 118: gathered twelve men who testified t
- Page 119 and 120: whether the qāḍī accepted al-
- Page 121 and 122: in the Assarraf collection indicate
- Page 123 and 124: (ittifāqīyan) and were testifying
- Page 125 and 126: In another instance of oath avoidan
- Page 127 and 128: Sharī‘a courts provided a crucia
- Page 129 and 130: agreement notarized according to Is
- Page 131 and 132: ability and desire to move among di
- Page 133 and 134: ‘udūl. 14 Most real estate trans
- Page 135 and 136: equire or benefit from adjudication
- Page 137 and 138: Simultaneous Use of Jewish and Isla
- Page 139 and 140: evidence from the nineteenth centur
- Page 141 and 142: to sue other Jews in sharī‘a cou
- Page 143 and 144: But what about intra-Jewish lawsuit
- Page 145 and 146: ut for the most part this is a here
- Page 147 and 148: the sum of three duoros per month.
- Page 149 and 150: only in Jewish law. This happened i
- Page 151 and 152: in the millāḥ of Marrakesh on Ap
- Page 153 and 154: aware of Jewish law and sometimes t
- Page 155 and 156: of a rabbi to determine the proper
Lease contracts, on the other hand, uniformly concerned real estate. In all the lease<br />
contracts found in the collection, the Assarrafs were the landlords renting property to Muslims—<br />
never the other way around. 102 Again, this is not representative of broader trends, since legal<br />
documents held in other collections preserve examples of Jews renting property from<br />
Muslims. 103<br />
Most of the leases in the Assarraf collection were for the usufruct rights—that is, the right<br />
to occupy the property in question—to stores which belonged to a pious endowment (ḥubs or<br />
waqf). 104 The usufruct rights to a ḥubs property were owned separately from the property itself.<br />
There were a number of different kinds of usufruct titles, though the only one used in the<br />
Assarraf documents is zīna. 105 Specifically, one acquired a zīna on a ḥubs property by “filling<br />
the property with equipment, windows, or similarly useful accessories.” 106 Subsequently, the<br />
usufruct right was transferable, inheritable, and could be leased separately from a lease on the<br />
property itself. 107 (The zīna was not so different from the ḥazaqah in Jewish law, which I<br />
discuss further in the following chapter.) The Assarrafs owned the zīna of at least three different<br />
stores in the millāḥ of Fez, stores that belonged to a pious endowment. 108 The Assarrafs rented<br />
102<br />
The single rental contract in which a Jew was the tenant concerned Ḥaim b. Ya‘aqov Harosh, an associate of the<br />
Assarrafs; Ḥaim rented the usufruct rights (zīna) to a store from al-‘Isāwī b. al-‘Adal (TC, File #6, 4 Dhū al-Qa‘da<br />
1320).<br />
103<br />
See, for instance, UL, Or.26.543 (1), 18 Rajab 1302 (in which Masān b. Harān, the agent of Yeshu‘a Corcos,<br />
rented part of a house in Marrakesh from the Muslim al-‘Abbās b. al-Mahdī al-Sharādī); Or.26.543 (2), 11 Rabī‘ II<br />
1320 (in which ‘Akān b. Ḥaim Corcos rented a funduq from the Makhzan in Essaouira); PD, 30 Rabī ‘ II 1366 (in<br />
which Ya‘aqov b. Avraham Sabbāgh rented a room in Fez from a Muslim).<br />
104<br />
Eleven of the seventeen lease contracts were for the zīna of a store.<br />
105<br />
See Louis Milliot, Démembrements du Habous : menfa‘ā, gzā, guelsā, zīnā, istighrāq (Paris: Editions Ernest<br />
Leroux, 1918); on zīna in particular, see 57-59. See also G. Baer, “Ḥikr,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, ed. P. Bearman,<br />
et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2003); J. Abribat, “Essai sur les contrats de quasi-aliénation et de location perpétuelle auxquels<br />
l’institution du hobous à donné naissance,” Revue Algérienne et Tunisienne de Législation et de Jurisprudence 17<br />
(1901).<br />
106<br />
“…garnir le local du matériel meublant, vitrines ou accessoires analogues utiles” (Milliot, Démembrements du<br />
Habous, 57).<br />
107<br />
Ibid., Chapter 1.<br />
108<br />
One was across from the Funduq al-Diwān, another was the second store on the left of the same funduq, and the<br />
last was the third store on the left of the same funduq. The first such lease contract is from 5 Muḥarram 1301 (TC,<br />
97