20.04.2013 Views

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

compact discs, which were used to obtain <strong>the</strong> hourly surface observations. The surface stations<br />

used for <strong>the</strong> SRL75 CALMET modeling are shown in Table 4‐2.<br />

Table 4‐2. 1975 Savannah River Laboratory surface meteorological stations.<br />

State Cities<br />

Georgia A<strong>the</strong>ns, Atlanta, Augusta, Macon, Savannah<br />

North Carolina Asheville, Charlotte, Greensboro, Raleigh‐Durham,<br />

Wilmington<br />

South Carolina Charleston, Columbia, Greer‐Spartanburg<br />

Twice daily soundings came from <strong>the</strong> second set <strong>of</strong> compact discs, <strong>the</strong> Radiosonde Data for<br />

North America. The upper‐air rawinsonde meteorological observations used in <strong>the</strong> SRL75<br />

CALMET modeling are shown in Table 4‐3.<br />

Table 4‐3. 1975 Savannah River Laboratory tracer experiment rawinsonde sites.<br />

State Cities<br />

Georgia A<strong>the</strong>ns, Waycross<br />

North Carolina Greensboro, Cape Hatteras<br />

South Carolina Charleston<br />

Six vertical layers were defined for <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> modeling to be consistent with <strong>the</strong> Irwin (1997)<br />

<strong>and</strong> EPA (1998a) modeling as follows: surface‐20, 20‐50, 50‐100, 100‐500, 500‐2000, <strong>and</strong> 2000‐<br />

3300 meters.<br />

MM5 prognostic meteorological model simulations were conducted using grid resolutions <strong>of</strong><br />

36, 12 <strong>and</strong> 4 km. The CALMET modeling used <strong>the</strong> 12 km MM5 data. The MMIF tool was<br />

applied using all three MM5 grid resolutions <strong>and</strong> using <strong>the</strong> first 27 MM5 vertical layers from <strong>the</strong><br />

surface to approximately 6,500 m AGL.<br />

4.2.2 <strong>CALPUFF</strong> Control Options<br />

The following <strong>CALPUFF</strong> control parameters, which are a subset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> control parameters, were<br />

used. These parameters <strong>and</strong> options were chosen to be consistent with <strong>the</strong> 1977 INEL study<br />

(Irwin 1997) <strong>and</strong> 1998 EPA <strong>CALPUFF</strong> evaluation (EPA, 1998a) studies. Note that use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slug<br />

option (MSLUG = 1) is fairly non‐st<strong>and</strong>ard for LRT modeling. However, that was what was used<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 1997 INEL <strong>and</strong> 1998 EPA studies so it was also used in this study’s <strong>CALPUFF</strong> evaluation<br />

using <strong>the</strong> SRL75 tracer database.<br />

Technical options (group 2):<br />

MCTADJ = 0 No terrain adjustment<br />

MCTSG = 0 No subgrid scale complex terrain is modeled<br />

MSLUG = 1 Near‐field puffs modeled as elongated (i.e., slugs)<br />

MTRANS = 1 Transitional plume rise is modeled<br />

MTIP = 1 Stack tip downwash is modeled<br />

MSHEAR = 0 Vertical wind shear is NOT modeled above stack top<br />

MSPLIT = 0 No puff splitting<br />

MCHEM = 0 No chemical transformations<br />

MWET = 0 No wet removal processes<br />

MDRY = 0 No dry removal processes<br />

MPARTL = 0 No partial plume penetration<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!