Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table C‐55.<br />
Summary y <strong>of</strong> model r<br />
Statisttic<br />
1 FMSS<br />
CA<br />
FARR<br />
FLEX<br />
PODD<br />
CA<br />
TS FLEX<br />
FOEXX<br />
HYS<br />
FA22<br />
CA<br />
FA55<br />
CA<br />
NMSSE<br />
FLEX<br />
PCC orr<br />
R CA<br />
FB FLEX<br />
KS HYS<br />
st<br />
anking using<br />
2<br />
Mx S<br />
PART<br />
Mx FL<br />
PART<br />
SPLIT<br />
Mx S<br />
Mx S<br />
PART<br />
Mx S<br />
PART<br />
SPLIT<br />
nd<br />
g <strong>the</strong> statist<br />
3<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
CAMx<br />
LEXPART<br />
CAMx<br />
CAMx<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
CAMx<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
CAMx<br />
CAMx<br />
rd<br />
tical perform<br />
4<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
FLEXPART<br />
FLEXPART<br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
SCIPUFF<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
th<br />
mance metri<br />
5<br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
HYSPLIT<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
HYSPLIT<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
SCIPUFF<br />
CALGRID<br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
th<br />
cs.<br />
6<br />
FLEXPAART<br />
CALG<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
CALG<br />
CALPUUFF<br />
CALG<br />
CALPUUFF<br />
CALG<br />
CALGRRID<br />
FLEX<br />
CALGRRID<br />
CALP<br />
CALPUUFF<br />
CALG<br />
CALGRRID<br />
HYS<br />
FLEXPAART<br />
HYS<br />
CALGRRID<br />
HYS<br />
FLEXPAART<br />
CALG<br />
th<br />
GRID<br />
GRID<br />
GRID<br />
GRID<br />
XPART<br />
PUFF<br />
GRID<br />
SPLIT<br />
SPLIT<br />
SPLIT<br />
GRID<br />
Avg.<br />
Rankinng<br />
CAMx<br />
SSCIPUFF<br />
Avg. Sccore<br />
1. 55<br />
2.72<br />
RANK<br />
Rankinng<br />
CAMx<br />
SSCIPUFF<br />
RANK<br />
1. 91<br />
1.71<br />
FLEXPART<br />
C.5 COMMPARISON<br />
OF O SIX LRT MMODEL<br />
MODDELING<br />
PERFFORMANCE<br />
USING THE CCAPTEX‐5<br />
EXPERIMMENT<br />
C.5.1 SPATIAL<br />
ANAL LYSIS OF MOODEL<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
Figure C‐ ‐30 displays <strong>the</strong> FMS spaatial<br />
analysiss<br />
performancce<br />
metrics foor<br />
<strong>the</strong> six LRT<br />
models annd<br />
<strong>the</strong> CTEXX5<br />
tracer study<br />
field expeeriment.<br />
SCCIPUFF<br />
(22.677%)<br />
<strong>and</strong> CAMMx<br />
(22.66%) ) models aree<br />
<strong>the</strong><br />
two best performing g models for <strong>the</strong> FMS staatistic<br />
with nnearly<br />
identiccal<br />
scores. TThey<br />
are<br />
followed by HYSPLIT (18.5%), CAALPUFF<br />
(17.55%),<br />
FLEXPARRT<br />
(17.2), annd<br />
CALGRID (16.1%).<br />
Figure C‐ ‐30. Figure <strong>of</strong> o Merit in SSpace<br />
(FMS) ) statistical pperformancee<br />
metric for <strong>the</strong> six LRT<br />
models a<strong>and</strong><br />
CAPTEX Release 5.<br />
3.0<br />
FLEXPART<br />
1.44<br />
33<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
4.0<br />
<strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />
1.43<br />
CALPUUFF<br />
CALGGRID<br />
4.277<br />
5. 55<br />
HYSPLIT<br />
CALGGRID<br />
1.255<br />
0. 98