Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ... Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Model configuration options for the nine sensitivity runs are detailed in Table 6‐5. In general, model control options were held to default values with two notable exceptions, the INITD and NUMPAR variables. HYSPLIT performance is highly sensitive to the number of particles released in the simulation. The HYSPLIT parameter NUMPAR controls the number of particles released over the duration of the emissions release. The default value for NUMPAR is set to 2500, but the user must take caution to insure that a sufficient number of particles are released to provide a “smooth temporal change” in concentration fields (NOAA, 2009). The original NOAA configuration for HYSPLIT was for INITD = 104 that is a particle/puff hybrid configuration (3D part – THh‐Pv) with NUMPAR set to 1500. Original sensitivity runs found that the concentration fields were spotty; therefore, NUMPAR was set to 10000 to provide for smoother temporal evolution of the concentration fields. Table 6‐4. HYSPLIT INITD options and descriptions. INITD Value Description 0 (Default) 3D Particle Horizontal and Vertical 1 Gaussian horizontal and top‐hat vertical puff (Gh‐THv) 2 Top‐hat horizontal and vertical puff (THh‐THv) 3 Gaussian horizontal puff and vertical particle distribution (Gh‐Pv) 4 Top‐hat horizontal puff and vertical particle distribution (THh‐Pv) 103 3D particle (#0) converts to Gh‐Pv (#3) 104 3D particle (#0) converts to THh‐Pv (#4) 130 Gh‐Pv (#3) converts to 3D particle (#0) 140 THh‐Pv (#4) converts to 3D particle (#0) Table 6‐5. HYSPLIT sensitivity runs and relevant configuration parameters. Sensitivity Test INITD NUMPAR ISOT KSPL FRHS FRVS FRTS FRME INITD0 0 10000 1 NA NA NA NA NA INITD1 1 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD2 2 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD3 3 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD4 4 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD103 103 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD104 104 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD130 130 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 INITD140 140 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10 135
Figure 6‐ ‐22 displays the t spatial mmodel perforrmance statistics for the tests. Wide variation n in spatial pperformancee is noted across the nin examinattion. For example, the ttwo puff bassed configuraations (INITD poorest sspatial perfo ormance of aall of the runns with low PPOD and TS v values coompared to all a other connfigurations. . The 3D parrticle based higher POOD, TS, and lower FAR inn comparison, yet it hadd a comparab INITD2. SSince the FM MS score exaamines all model/observved values g additionaal spatial me etrics use a ccontingency level of 1000 pg m 3D particcle configura ation performmed significaantly better 3 , but its spatial perfo ormance deggraded withh concentrat The puff‐ ‐particle hyb brid configurrations (INITD3, INTID4, consistenntly better overall o acrosss all four spaatial metrics ‐3 e HYSPLIT INITD sensitiviity e runs and rrequires closser D1 and INITDD2) showed the values and mmuch higherr FAR configuratioon (INITD0) hhad bly low FMS to INITD1 and reater than 0 and the , it caan be interpreted that thhe at concentrration levels above 100 ppg m ion ranges bbelow the coontingency le INITD103, INNITD104) peerformed s. ‐ evel. Figure 6‐ ‐22. Spatial model perfoormance staatistics for nnine HYSPLITT INITD senssitiviity experimeents. 136
- Page 121 and 122: 5.4.1.4 Comparison of CALPUFF CTEX3
- Page 123 and 124: 0.48 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 ‐0.12 16% 1
- Page 125 and 126: CTEX3 discussed in Section 5.4.1. A
- Page 127 and 128: CALPUFF sensitivity simulations are
- Page 129 and 130: 14. Across all the spatial statisti
- Page 131 and 132: sensitivity tests. The “B” seri
- Page 133 and 134: ‐0.1 ‐0.2 0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
- Page 135 and 136: 6.0 1994 EUROPEAN TRACER EXPERIMENT
- Page 137 and 138: Figure 6‐2a. Surface synoptic met
- Page 139 and 140: Figure 6‐3a. Distribution of the
- Page 141 and 142: 36 kilometers and the vertical stru
- Page 143 and 144: splitting flag near sunset (hour 17
- Page 145 and 146: experienced during the original ETE
- Page 147 and 148: 2 1 0 ‐1 ‐2 3 2 1 0 23‐Oct 23
- Page 149 and 150: 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Figu
- Page 151 and 152: Figure 6‐9. Factor of Exceedance
- Page 153 and 154: eceiving a 0.0 score. Figure 6‐13
- Page 155 and 156: Table 6‐1. Summary of model ranki
- Page 157 and 158: plume spread and observed surface c
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 6‐16c. Comparison of spati
- Page 161 and 162: • NoPiG: The tracer emissions wer
- Page 163 and 164: Using the NMSE statistical performa
- Page 165 and 166: 6.4.3.2 Effect of PiG on Model Perf
- Page 167 and 168: 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5
- Page 169 and 170: Table 6‐3. Summary of CALPUFF puf
- Page 171: 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 6‐ ‐23a. Global model pe
- Page 177 and 178: Figure 6‐24. Figure of Merit (FMS
- Page 179 and 180: 7.0 REFERENCES Anderson, B. 2008. T
- Page 181 and 182: EPA, 1984: Interim Procedures for E
- Page 183 and 184: Mlawer, E.J., S.J. Taubman, P.D. Br
- Page 185 and 186: 148 Appendix A Evaluation of the MM
- Page 187 and 188: Table A‐1. Wind speed and wind di
- Page 189 and 190: Table A‐3. Definition of the CTEX
- Page 191 and 192: Figure A‐ ‐1. Wind speed bias (
- Page 193 and 194: Figure A‐ ‐3. Humidity bias and
- Page 195 and 196: Table A‐5. Comparison of CTEX5 MM
- Page 197 and 198: B.1 CALMET MODEL EVALUATION TO IDEN
- Page 199 and 200: Figure B‐ ‐1 displays th he win
- Page 201 and 202: Table B‐2a. Summary wind speed mo
- Page 203 and 204: B.2 CONCLUSIONS OF CTEX3 CALMET SEN
- Page 205 and 206: C.1 INTRODUCTION In this section, t
- Page 207 and 208: C.2.2 HYYSPLIT GLOB BAL STATISTIICS
- Page 209 and 210: The final panel in Figure C‐3 (bo
- Page 211 and 212: Figure C‐ ‐5. Global model m pe
- Page 213 and 214: C.3 CAMX SENSITIVITY TESTS Followin
- Page 215 and 216: ACM2 Kzz combinatio ons rank as the
- Page 217 and 218: Figure C‐ ‐10. Spatial model pe
- Page 219 and 220: Figure C‐ ‐12. Global model per
- Page 221 and 222: Figure C‐ ‐13. Spatial model pe
Model configuration options for <strong>the</strong> nine sensitivity runs are detailed in Table 6‐5. In general,<br />
model control options were held to default values with two notable exceptions, <strong>the</strong> INITD <strong>and</strong><br />
NUMPAR variables. HYSPLIT performance is highly sensitive to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> particles released<br />
in <strong>the</strong> simulation. The HYSPLIT parameter NUMPAR controls <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> particles released<br />
over <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emissions release. The default value for NUMPAR is set to 2500, but<br />
<strong>the</strong> user must take caution to insure that a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> particles are released to<br />
provide a “smooth temporal change” in concentration fields (NOAA, 2009). The original NOAA<br />
configuration for HYSPLIT was for INITD = 104 that is a particle/puff hybrid configuration (3D<br />
part – THh‐Pv) with NUMPAR set to 1500. Original sensitivity runs found that <strong>the</strong> concentration<br />
fields were spotty; <strong>the</strong>refore, NUMPAR was set to 10000 to provide for smoo<strong>the</strong>r temporal<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentration fields.<br />
Table 6‐4. HYSPLIT INITD options <strong>and</strong> descriptions.<br />
INITD Value Description<br />
0 (Default) 3D Particle Horizontal <strong>and</strong> Vertical<br />
1 Gaussian horizontal <strong>and</strong> top‐hat vertical puff (Gh‐THv)<br />
2 Top‐hat horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical puff (THh‐THv)<br />
3 Gaussian horizontal puff <strong>and</strong> vertical particle distribution (Gh‐Pv)<br />
4 Top‐hat horizontal puff <strong>and</strong> vertical particle distribution (THh‐Pv)<br />
103 3D particle (#0) converts to Gh‐Pv (#3)<br />
104 3D particle (#0) converts to THh‐Pv (#4)<br />
130 Gh‐Pv (#3) converts to 3D particle (#0)<br />
140 THh‐Pv (#4) converts to 3D particle (#0)<br />
Table 6‐5. HYSPLIT sensitivity runs <strong>and</strong> relevant configuration parameters.<br />
Sensitivity<br />
Test INITD NUMPAR ISOT KSPL FRHS FRVS FRTS FRME<br />
INITD0 0 10000 1 NA NA NA NA NA<br />
INITD1 1 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD2 2 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD3 3 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD4 4 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD103 103 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD104 104 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD130 130 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
INITD140 140 10000 1 1 1.0 0.01 0.10 0.10<br />
135