20.04.2013 Views

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experienced during <strong>the</strong> original ETEX exercise if forecast fields ra<strong>the</strong>r ECMWF analysis<br />

fields had been employed. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> MM5 simulation has <strong>the</strong> added advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

data assimilation to constrain <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> forecast error as a function <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

• Second, since each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five LRT model platforms evaluated in this project are presented<br />

with <strong>the</strong> same meteorological database; a systemic degradation <strong>of</strong> performance due to<br />

advection error would have been observed if <strong>the</strong> meteorology was a primary source <strong>of</strong><br />

model error. However, since poor model performance was only noted in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five<br />

models, meteorological error was not considered <strong>the</strong> primary cause <strong>of</strong> poor performance.<br />

• Finally, since wind direction is likely one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key meteorological parameters for LRT<br />

simulations, <strong>the</strong> operational decision to use <strong>the</strong> existing MM5 forecasts was made<br />

because <strong>the</strong> MM5 wind direction forecasts were within acceptable statistical limits.<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

‐1<br />

‐2<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

23‐Oct<br />

23‐Oct<br />

24‐Oct<br />

24‐Oct<br />

WS Bias (m/s)<br />

25‐Oct<br />

Figure 6‐4a. ETEX MM5 model performance statistics <strong>of</strong> Bias (top) <strong>and</strong> RMSE (bottom) for<br />

wind speed <strong>and</strong> comparison with benchmarks (purple lines).<br />

108<br />

26‐Oct<br />

WS RMSE (m/s)<br />

25‐Oct<br />

26‐Oct<br />

27‐Oct<br />

27‐Oct<br />

Avg<br />

Avg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!