20.04.2013 Views

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

splitting flag near sunset (hour 17), artificially limiting <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> split puffs that are<br />

generated by <strong>the</strong> model. However, for <strong>the</strong> ETEX evaluation puff‐splitting was enabled for each<br />

simulation hour instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> default option <strong>of</strong> once per day in order to allow for full<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> wind shear. The puff splitting feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> modeling system does not<br />

have a complementary puff “merging” feature which aggregates puffs according to specified<br />

rules when <strong>the</strong>y occupy <strong>the</strong> same space. Without <strong>the</strong> complementary puff merging capability,<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> puffs generated by puff‐splitting can rapidly increase, resulting in extensive<br />

computational requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model <strong>and</strong> eventual simulation termination once <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum number <strong>of</strong> puffs allowed by <strong>the</strong> model is exceeded. Since <strong>the</strong> ETEX <strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />

application was <strong>of</strong> short duration, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> puffs allowed was increased so no termination<br />

occurred. However, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> all hour puff splitting with <strong>CALPUFF</strong> in an annual simulation<br />

could be problematic. The SCIPUFF Lagrangian puff model also performs puff splitting when a<br />

sheared environment is encountered, however it can perform puff merging when two puffs<br />

occupy <strong>the</strong> “same” space so does not suffer from <strong>the</strong> extensive computer time <strong>of</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />

when aggressive puff splitting is desired.<br />

The horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical grid structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> were similar to <strong>the</strong> parent MM5 data.<br />

Twenty‐seven (27) vertical levels were used in <strong>CALPUFF</strong> with each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first 27 MM5 layers<br />

matched explicitly to <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> vertical structure, through <strong>the</strong> lowest 4,900 m vertical depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atmosphere. Additionally, 168 discrete receptors were included in <strong>the</strong> modeling analysis,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> each corresponding to <strong>the</strong> location <strong>and</strong> elevation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ETEX monitors.<br />

AERMOD (EPA, 2004) turbulence coefficients, no complex terrain adjustment, <strong>and</strong> puff‐splitting<br />

were selected for this analysis. A constant emission rate <strong>of</strong> 7.95 g/s was assigned for twelve<br />

hours <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PMCH tracer. Plume rise <strong>and</strong> momentum were also simulated in<br />

<strong>CALPUFF</strong> according to <strong>the</strong> release characteristics detailed on <strong>the</strong> ETEX website. <strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />

results were integrated for 90 hours, <strong>and</strong> model results were post‐processed in order to<br />

generate 30 three (3) hour averages for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 168 discrete receptors.<br />

For SCIPUFF simulations, <strong>the</strong> horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical grid structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extracted MM5 data<br />

were similar to <strong>the</strong> original MM5 data. Twenty‐eight (28) vertical levels were extracted,<br />

encompassing a depth <strong>of</strong> approximately 5,000 m, similar to <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> simulations. Plume<br />

rise <strong>and</strong> momentum were also simulated in SCIPUFF in <strong>the</strong> same manner as <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong><br />

simulations. SCIPUFF results were also integrated for 90 hours, <strong>and</strong> model results were post‐<br />

processed in order to generate 30 three (3) hour averages for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same 168 discrete<br />

receptors.<br />

FLEXPART simulations used a 375 x 175 horizontal grid at a resolution 0.16° (~18 km)<br />

latitude/longitude. All MM5 vertical layers were extracted for <strong>the</strong> transport simulation. The<br />

FLEXPART concentration grid consisted <strong>of</strong> 15 vertical levels from <strong>the</strong> surface to 1,500 m with 9<br />

layers below <strong>the</strong> first 500 m. Emissions were released at 10 meters. Concentrations were bi‐<br />

linearly interpolated to grid cells corresponding to <strong>the</strong> 168 ETEX monitoring locations that were<br />

used.<br />

HYSPLIT simulations used a 60 x 60 concentration grid with a horizontal resolution 0.25° (~28<br />

km) latitude/longitude, consistent with NOAA’s model configuration for ETEX described on <strong>the</strong><br />

DATEM website. All MM5 vertical layers to 5000 meters were extracted for <strong>the</strong> transport<br />

simulation. Emissions were released at 10 meters. The gridded concentration output was<br />

linearly interpolated to <strong>the</strong> sampling locations utilizing s<strong>of</strong>tware from NOAA’s Data Archive <strong>of</strong><br />

Tracer Experiments <strong>and</strong> Meteorology (DATEM) project. HYSPLIT was configured as a puff‐<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!