Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Documentation of the Evaluation of CALPUFF and Other Long ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
0%<br />
‐5%<br />
‐10%<br />
‐15%<br />
‐20%<br />
‐25%<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
Figure 5‐15a. Global model performance statistics for <strong>the</strong> CTEX5 <strong>CALPUFF</strong> sensitivity tests<br />
using <strong>the</strong> 12 km MM5 data.<br />
‐0.1 0<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
EXP 4A<br />
EXP 4A<br />
EXP 4A<br />
EXP 4B<br />
EXP 4B<br />
Factor <strong>of</strong> Exceedance (FOEX)<br />
(Perfect = 0%)<br />
EXP 4C<br />
EXP 4C<br />
EXP 4D<br />
EXP 6A<br />
EXP 6B<br />
Fractional Bias (FB)<br />
(Perfect = 0)<br />
EXP 4D<br />
EXP 6A<br />
16%<br />
12%<br />
8%<br />
4%<br />
0%<br />
EXP 6B<br />
EXP4A<br />
EXP 6C<br />
EXP 6C<br />
EXP4B<br />
EXP4C<br />
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC)<br />
(Perfect = 1)<br />
EXP 4B<br />
EXP 4C<br />
EXP 4D<br />
EXP 6A<br />
EXP 6B<br />
EXP 6C<br />
EXP 6D<br />
EXP 6D<br />
EXP 6D<br />
4K MMIF<br />
4K MMIF<br />
Figure 5‐15b. Global model performance statistics for <strong>the</strong> CTEX5 <strong>CALPUFF</strong> sensitivity tests<br />
using <strong>the</strong> 12 km MM5 data (higher values indicate better performance).<br />
5.4.2.4 Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> CTEX5 Model <strong>Evaluation</strong> using Different MM5 Grid Resolutions<br />
This section analyzes <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong> model performance across different MM5 <strong>and</strong> CALMET grid<br />
resolutions using <strong>the</strong> “B” <strong>and</strong> “D” series <strong>of</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong>/CALMET <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>CALPUFF</strong>/MMIF<br />
93<br />
12K MMIF<br />
12K MMIF<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Factor <strong>of</strong> 2 <strong>and</strong> 5 (Perfect = 100%)<br />
4K MMIF<br />
EXP4D<br />
12K MMIF<br />
EXP6A<br />
EXP6B<br />
EXP6C<br />
EXP6D<br />
2.4<br />
2<br />
1.6<br />
1.2<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
0<br />
4KM_MMIF<br />
EXP4A<br />
EXP 4A<br />
EXP 4A<br />
EXP4B<br />
Normalized Mean Square Error<br />
(NMSE)<br />
(Perfect = 0)<br />
EXP 4B<br />
EXP 4B<br />
EXP 4C<br />
EXP 4C<br />
EXP 4D<br />
EXP 4D<br />
EXP 6A<br />
EXP 6A<br />
EXP 6B<br />
EXP 6B<br />
EXP 6C<br />
EXP 6C<br />
EXP 6D<br />
EXP 6D<br />
4K MMIF<br />
Kolmogorov‐Smirnov Parameter<br />
(KSP)<br />
(Perfect = 0%)<br />
12KM_MMIF<br />
EXP4C<br />
FA2<br />
FA5<br />
Rank (RANK) (Perfect = 4)<br />
EXP4D<br />
EXP6A<br />
EXP6B<br />
EXP6C<br />
EXP6D<br />
4KM_MMIF<br />
12KM_MMIF<br />
4K MMIF<br />
12K MMIF<br />
12K MMIF<br />
(1‐KS/100)<br />
FMS/100<br />
(1‐FB/2)<br />
R^2