20.04.2013 Views

HEAVEN BORN MERIDA AND ITS DESTINY - Histomesoamericana

HEAVEN BORN MERIDA AND ITS DESTINY - Histomesoamericana

HEAVEN BORN MERIDA AND ITS DESTINY - Histomesoamericana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 INTRODUCTION<br />

that is what they are.<br />

All these materials are profoundly interwoven with the mystique and<br />

ritual of the calendar. They are dated by katuns and are preoccupied with<br />

katun ritual, referring frequently to the various acts of the katun ceremonial<br />

drama as outlined above. All the katun histories, for example,<br />

mention seating (act 9) and the word of the katun (act 15), and most of<br />

them give at least a précis of the sermon (act 20). All the earlier katun<br />

histories refer to at least four and as many as eight of the thirteen acts of<br />

the ceremonial of the katun. This structure disappears rapidly after 1677.<br />

None of the histories appears to refer to the first seven acts of the baktun<br />

ceremonial. In almost all cases, allusions to the ritual follow the order of<br />

the acts in the original may ceremonial of 11 Ahau in 1539.<br />

The katun histories may be precisely characterized, then, as ritual history.<br />

They are considerably constrained by the expectation that they will<br />

convert the real history of each twenty-year period into the language and<br />

ritual order of the katun ceremonial. And that they do—often with remarkable<br />

economy and elegance. By the same token, this is intentionally<br />

esoteric history, and, while the Mayan sun priests had an intensive education<br />

in it, we latter-day scribes are forced to educate ourselves, inevitably<br />

somewhat imperfectly. Like our Mayan forebears, we worry a lot about<br />

philosophy, specifically about the cosmology and theology that shaped,<br />

and were shaped by, the mystique of the katun, the may, and the baktun.<br />

Myth. Mayan cosmology formally begins with a characteristic ending:<br />

13.0.0.0.0 4 Ahau 8 Cumku (August 15, 3115 B.C.). The morning after<br />

that date was the beginning of the pseudohistorical Mayan calendar. It<br />

was also zero. Nothing existed—not even God, according to some accounts.<br />

There is reason to suppose that this date was the end of the third<br />

or possibly even the fourth baktun cycle of 5,200 tuns, implying an even<br />

earlier starting date around 20,000 B.C., but even that was merely a moment<br />

in a cycle that is bound to repeat itself. The first beginning of everything<br />

was time itself.<br />

This mystery is beautifully expressed in the creation myth "The Birth<br />

of the Uinal," which constitutes chapter 20 of the Chumayel. This delicate<br />

allegory likens the birth of time to the origin of man, a man traveling<br />

like the heavenly bodies on the road of days, time, sun, and fate<br />

[kin), carrying his burden of sin and shame to its inevitable and selfregenerative<br />

end.<br />

Did man come before woman? No, it was four female relatives of his<br />

who discovered time. So much for the rib of Adam. This may be an exquisite<br />

recognition that women counted time more precisely by the moon<br />

(u), as most American Indians did, for a long time before it could be paced<br />

(oc) by the sun priest. And for very good reasons: women were naturally<br />

more concerned with the approximately lunar cycle of menstruation and<br />

with the period of gestation, which seems to have given rise to the (again<br />

approximate) cycle of the 260-day tzol kin. What the women discovered in<br />

the footprints of Time was sex: the footprint of lah caoc'll Oc, twelve<br />

foot, or all of two feet'. After that, men and women traveled together. No

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!