1 - Histomesoamericana
1 - Histomesoamericana
1 - Histomesoamericana
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
i8 THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY<br />
Cans with the East priest Bol<br />
Ay and the East priest Xib<br />
Chac, the three victims who<br />
were sacrificed at Izamal. (274)<br />
It ended with the crime of<br />
Y etel Chac Bol Ai<br />
Y etel Chac Xib Chac<br />
Ox num<br />
Ti ya*<br />
U pixan<br />
T an u mansic u num yail<br />
Uai<br />
Itzmal<br />
Tabtab i<br />
T u men u keban<br />
Y ahau<br />
Can Ul e*<br />
With the East priest Bol Ay<br />
And the East priest Xib Chac:<br />
The three victims<br />
270 In pain<br />
Whose souls<br />
Underwent suffering<br />
Here<br />
At Izamal,<br />
275 All tied up then<br />
Because of the sin<br />
Of the lord<br />
Who was Can Ul.<br />
270. Barrera 1948: 224 has 'great was the suffering'.<br />
278. Can Ul 'snake snail', a lord of Izamal and a member of the Can lineage on<br />
his mother's side and the Ul lineage on his father's, hence a relative of the Cans of<br />
Izamal and Chichen Itza, including Kukul Can. The squabble here was significantly<br />
dynastic. With patrilineal succession and lineage exogamy, the successor to<br />
Ul Ahau should have been an Ahau, but none appears in this account. Can Ul's<br />
claim to patrilineal legitimacy rests on what may have been an incestuous union.<br />
The closest kinship relations between him and Ul Ahau would reconstruct as:<br />
d=Q cf<br />
- U1 UlAhau UlAhau [3]<br />
d=Qd'=Q fr=Q<br />
+ UIU1<br />
Can Ahau<br />
U1U1 ni ni Can ' Ahau Can Ahau Ul- +<br />
|Can) Ahau<br />
cr<br />
(f<br />
UlAhau[2\ CANUL<br />
UlAhau\\\<br />
A legitimate series of marriages could have made Can Ul the father's sister's son<br />
of the retiring lord, Ul Ahau (1). If preferential cross-cousin marriage obtained<br />
(Eggan 1934), Can Ul's mother's brother might have married his father's sister,<br />
producing a relationship through his father, as the text claims, to Ul Ahau (2).<br />
Such a relationship would be either too close (incestuous) or too distant to warrant<br />
succession: Can Ul's father and his father's sister would have to be Ul Uls.<br />
As the retiring lord was presumably, older, it is also possible that Ul Ahau (3) was<br />
the brother of Can Ul's paternal grandmother who married incestuously.<br />
All the Cans could be as close as half brothers, sons, or grandsons to one<br />
another and, given polygyny, some of them very likely were. Any one of them<br />
could have been Can Ul's father's sister's son, but not if Can Ul had any close<br />
relationship to Ul Ahau. Finally, one of them, Ahau Can, could have been Ul<br />
Ahau's mother's brother's son or sister's son's son without incest. The genealogy<br />
of this would have been:<br />
Cf=Q<br />
d"=<br />
-Can<br />
9<br />
UlAhau<br />
p*=9 cf=¿<br />
-Ul " han T til r-„ <<br />
r . Can Ahau<br />
Can Ahau<br />
"T Ul Can<br />
Ul Can<br />
AL<br />
Ahaucr<br />
CanUl<br />
cr<br />
Ul Ahau<br />
cr<br />
AHAU CAN<br />
Ul Ahau<br />
(note continued on following page)<br />
JLá