20.04.2013 Views

Phacodynamics

Phacodynamics

Phacodynamics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128 PHACODYNAMICS: STEP BY STEP<br />

15 <strong>Phacodynamics</strong><br />

A clear understanding of the physical and mechanical<br />

principles that govern phacoemulsification can facilitate<br />

usage of this technique for effective and efficient cataract<br />

removal<br />

It is essential to understand the basic principle of<br />

phacodynamics. This is even more relevant to bimanual<br />

microphaco and is mandatory for the evolution of this<br />

technique.<br />

<strong>Phacodynamics</strong> is defined as the study of the fundamental<br />

principles of inflow rates, outflow rates, vacuum,<br />

phaco power modulation along with microsurgical<br />

maneuvers with different types and grade of cataract.<br />

A true understanding of this will help in logical setting<br />

of the machine parameters in adaptation to different<br />

surgical techniques.<br />

Even the most modern machine will not give adequate<br />

results as compared to an older machine if the principles<br />

of phacodinamics are not well understood.<br />

Most of the surgeons use their equipment without<br />

really understanding their machines or the basic values<br />

which allow them to operate in great safety.<br />

The most important parameters in microphacoemulsification,<br />

in order to be performed well requires a<br />

good understanding of fluid mechanics.<br />

Basically the dynamics of phaco in both conventional<br />

and microphaco remain the same In microphaco<br />

irrigation is through the side port rather than through<br />

the irrigation slevees (Fig. 15.1).<br />

JEROME JEAN BOVET (SWITZERLAND)<br />

With this one of the major problems encountered is<br />

that not enough fluid is going into the eye through the<br />

side port irrigating chopper. In conventional phaco the<br />

silicon sleeve delivers up to 65 cc/min into the eye<br />

whereas the best irrigating choppers of 20 G cannot<br />

deliver more than 45 cc/min. keeping this basic fact in<br />

mind one has to work around it in term of surgical<br />

manoeuvers, fluid management, ultrasonics and type and<br />

grade of cataract.<br />

Some of the obvious advantages of bimanual microphaco<br />

are decreased incision size, less astigmatism, good<br />

anterior chamber maintenance if we understand the logic<br />

of phacodynamic.<br />

Because irrigation is separated from aspiration the<br />

added advantage theoretically is that all fluids comes in<br />

through one incision and exit through the other.We have<br />

always to take in account some leak from the irrigation<br />

sideport and from the aspiration sideport that’s we<br />

demonstrate in our experimental set-up.<br />

The irrigation fluid in conventional phaco has a<br />

tendency to push the fragments away from the aspiration<br />

tip.<br />

With bimanual microphaco we are improved<br />

followability, we are able to manipulate tissue with the<br />

incoming stream of fluid and we have a much more stable<br />

chamber because all of the fluid is entering through one<br />

side of the eye and leaving through the other side so we<br />

do not have competing currents of fluid aroud the phaco


FIGURE 15.1: Phaco overview<br />

needle. Of course bimanual irrigation and aspiration<br />

systeme of the cortex has been known for a long time to<br />

be advantageous.<br />

The fundamental principle of every cataract operation<br />

is to improve the vision of the patient after surgery of<br />

the cataract and not to diminish it.<br />

The purpose of the stability of the anterior chamber<br />

is to distance the endothelium and the posterior capsule<br />

from the tip of the probe.<br />

Consequently, in order to avoid any lesion of the<br />

corneal endothelium, the consequence of which is<br />

considerable corneal oedema with a risk of the need to<br />

perform a graft, it is imperative to control the stability<br />

and depth of the anterior chamber.<br />

We must always bear in mind that the principal cause<br />

of corneal grafts is the cataract operation.<br />

The most important heading in phacodynamic that<br />

will be discuss below are:<br />

• Fluidic<br />

• Surge<br />

Phacoemulsification is a cataract surgery in a close<br />

chamber, in a such close chamber ,one must monitor the<br />

inflow (irrigation), the outflow (aspiration) and the leak.<br />

There are three components of fluidics.<br />

Irrigation<br />

PHACODYNAMICS 129<br />

For most machines irrigation is passive, i.e. it is determined<br />

by the height of the perfusion and the diameter of<br />

the tube. Most of these machines do not possess a<br />

pressure control or a control of the flow rate of the liquid<br />

entering the eye. Such a control would make it possible<br />

to prevent the collapse of the anterior chamber. This is<br />

the weak point of all of the phacoemulsification machines<br />

and the bimanual microphaco technique.<br />

There are two ways of increasing the flow rate of the<br />

liquid in the anterior chamber:<br />

• By increasing the pressure<br />

Many authors have described theirs own methods to<br />

increase the flow by increasing the pressure everybody<br />

have forget the Poiseuilles law increasing the pressure<br />

increase also the pressure inside the eye and affect the<br />

endothelium<br />

• By increasing the diameter of the perfusion probe<br />

utilising a Duet handpieces design by Larry.Lacks of<br />

Microsurgical technology in which the chopping<br />

lumen of a 19 G tip deliver at least 60cc/min with a<br />

pressure of 33 mm Hg<br />

• An other way to increase inflow volume is to add an<br />

anterior chamber maintener as has been described


130 PHACODYNAMICS: STEP BY STEP<br />

by Michael Blumenthal, this device may be use in<br />

addition to or instead of an irrigating second instrument,altough<br />

it involves a third incision for access<br />

to the anterior chamber.<br />

Aspiration<br />

outflow Rate<br />

Outflow rate is defined as the volume of fluid by unit<br />

that exit the anterior chamber that governs the speed of<br />

the procedure and the danger to aspirated the iris or the<br />

posterior capsule<br />

Vacuum is what grips the nucleus which is occluding<br />

the phacotip, this grip allow to decrease ultrasound and<br />

aids chopping<br />

Leak<br />

In a conventional phaco the leak is a composant of the<br />

surge and the instability of the anterior chamber. In a<br />

bimanual microphaco with 19 G irrigation needle (that<br />

mean at least a 60 cc/min of irrigation). The controled<br />

leak is to cool done the phacotip without induce an<br />

instability of the anterior chamber (Fig. 15.2).<br />

The inflow rate has to be higher than the outflow<br />

rate even with the maximum of vacuum with every type<br />

of pump to avoid the surge.<br />

FIGURE 15.2: Aspiration-irrigation leak: Microbimanual 19 G<br />

FIGURE 15.3: Surge: Vacuum with a peristaltic pump<br />

Surge<br />

This phenomenon is produced when the phaco tip is<br />

occluded by nuclear masses. The increase in the negative<br />

pressure occurs up to the limit values that have been<br />

predetermined. The greater the negative pressure and the<br />

longer the time it is maintained, the larger will be the<br />

volume of liquid to be replaced along the length of the<br />

tubes at the time of the decompression. The vacuum will<br />

be propagated up to the anterior chamber leading to its<br />

collapse (Fig. 15.3).<br />

The best way to avoid the problem is to increase the<br />

flow rate upstream of the anterior chamber. In the case<br />

of bimanual surgery, it is necessary to increase the<br />

diameter of the irrigation probe to 19 G tip.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

1. Garg A, Fine I, Chang D, Metha K, Bovet J, Vejarano LP,<br />

et al. Mastering the art of Bimanual Microincision Phaco<br />

Ed Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, 2005.<br />

2. Barret G. Maxi-flow phaco needle ASCRS-ASOA Film<br />

festival first place, 1995.<br />

3. Blumenthal M, Assia EI, Chen V, Avni I. Using an anterior<br />

chamber maintainer to control intraocular pressure during<br />

phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994 ;20:93-<br />

6.<br />

4. Bovet J, Achard O, Baumgartner JM, Chiou A, C de<br />

Courten, Rabineau P. 0.9 mm Incision Bimanual Phacoand<br />

IOL Insertion Through a 1,7 mm Incision Symposium on


cataract, IOL and refractive surgery abst ASCRS-ASOA<br />

San Francisco April 12-16, 2003.<br />

5. Bovet J, Achard O, Baumgartner JM, Chiou A, de Courten,<br />

Rabineau P. Bimanual Phaco Trick and Track ASCRS-<br />

ASOA Film San Diego May 1-5:2004.<br />

6. Bovet J. 19 G Bimanual Micro Phaco ASCRS-ASOA<br />

abstract March 2006;17-22.<br />

7. Bovet JJ, Baumgartner JM, Bruckner JC, Ilic V, Paccolat<br />

F, Maroni O, et al. Chirurgie de la cataracte en topique<br />

intracamérulaire. Abstract SSO-SOG. Sept, 1997.<br />

8. David F, Chang MD. Phaco Chop: Mastering Techniques,<br />

Optimizing Technology, and Avoiding Complications<br />

Chapter 18: Bimanual Phaco Chop: Fluidic Strategies Eds<br />

Slack Incorporated, 2004.<br />

PHACODYNAMICS 131<br />

9. Kelman CD. Phacoemulsification and aspiration: a new<br />

technique of cataract extraction. Am J Ophthal 1967;64:<br />

23.<br />

10. Laurent Laroche Dan-Alexandre Lebuisson, Michel<br />

Montard, Chirurgie de la cataracte. Ed: MASSON, 1996.<br />

11. Lucio Buratto, Liliana Werner, Maurizio Zanini, David J<br />

Apple. Phacoemulsification: Principles and Techniques,<br />

(2nd Edition) Eds Slack Incorporated, 2003.<br />

12. Seibel BS. <strong>Phacodynamics</strong>. Mastering the tools and<br />

techniques of phacoemulsification Surgery Eds Slack<br />

Incorporated, 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!