Washington State Courts
Washington State Courts Washington State Courts
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR ....................................................... 1 Issues Pertaining to Assignments of Error ..................................... 2 B. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ...................................................... 3 C. ARGUMENT ................................................................................. 9 B.-H.'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE OFFICERS DID NOT CONDUCT A LAWFUL INVESTIGATIVE DETENTION ................................. 9 1. Johnson exceeded the limited scope of an investigative detention ................................................................................ 10 2. Johnson lacked probable cause to arrest B.-H. on the bus ..... 16 3. B.-H.'s consent to search was not voluntary ......................... 19 4. If the consent was voluntary, it was vitiated by the illegal seizure .................................................................................... 21 D. CONCLUSION ............................................................................ 23 -1-
WASHINGTON CASES TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page State v. Armenta 134 Wn.2d 1,948 P.2d 1280 (1997) .................................................. 21, 22 State v. Belieu 112 Wn.2d 587, 773 P.2d 46 (1989) .................................................. 11,12 State v. Chang 147 Wn. App. 490,195 P.3d 1008 (2008) review denied, 166 Wn.2d 1002 (2009) ................................................... 14 State v. Collins 121 Wn.2d 168, 847 P.2d 919 (1993) ................................................ 12, 13 State v. Day 161 Wn.2d 889,168 P.3d 1265 (2007) .................................................... 10 State v. Doughty 170 Wn.2d 57, 239 P.3d 573 (2010) ........................................................ 11 State v. Gaddy 152 Wn.2d 64, 93 P.3d 872 (2004) .................................................... 11, 16 State v. Garvin 166 Wn.2d 242,207 P.3d 1266 (2009) .................................................... 10 State v. Harper 33 Wn. App. 507,655 P.2d 1199 (1982) ................................................. 14 State v. Harrington 167 Wn.2d 656, 222 P.3d 92 (2009) .................................................. 17, 23 State v. Horrace 144 Wn.2d 386, 28 P.3d 753 (2001) ........................................................ 13 State v. Hughes 154 Wn.2d 118,110 P.3d 192 (2005) ...................................................... 15 -ll-
- Page 4 and 5: .. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONT'D) Pa
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONT'D) Page
- Page 8 and 9: 5. Even if the consent was voluntar
- Page 10 and 11: B.-H. walked "right past" Walker, w
- Page 12 and 13: their guns drawn, yes." RP 108. Joh
- Page 14 and 15: his coat pocket or walked with his
- Page 16 and 17: 1. Johnson exceeded the limited sco
- Page 18 and 19: arrest occurs if, "under the circum
- Page 20 and 21: movement appearing to be concealing
- Page 22 and 23: was lying handcuffed on the ground
- Page 24 and 25: As far as other purported suspiciou
- Page 26 and 27: Several factors to be considered in
- Page 28 and 29: Johnson knew that without probable
- Page 30: APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Page<br />
A. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR ....................................................... 1<br />
Issues Pertaining to Assignments of Error ..................................... 2<br />
B. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ...................................................... 3<br />
C. ARGUMENT ................................................................................. 9<br />
B.-H.'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN<br />
GRANTED BECAUSE OFFICERS DID NOT CONDUCT A<br />
LAWFUL INVESTIGATIVE DETENTION ................................. 9<br />
1. Johnson exceeded the limited scope of an investigative<br />
detention ................................................................................ 10<br />
2. Johnson lacked probable cause to arrest B.-H. on the bus ..... 16<br />
3. B.-H.'s consent to search was not voluntary ......................... 19<br />
4. If the consent was voluntary, it was vitiated by the illegal<br />
seizure .................................................................................... 21<br />
D. CONCLUSION ............................................................................ 23<br />
-1-
Change language