Crisis Intervention Using the NASP PREPaRE Model (2nd ed.)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluate Psychological Trauma Rationale for Assessing Psychological Trauma 1. Unique consequences of crisis exposure. a. Not all individuals will be equally affected. b. Recovery is the norm. i. Crisis intervention should be offered in response to demonstrated need. ii.“Not everyone exposed to trauma either needs or wants professional help.” (McNally et al., 2003, p. 73) iii. Exception: students with preexisting psychopathology. Note. Brock et al. (2009); Cohen et al. (2010)
Evaluate Psychological Trauma Rationale for Assessing Psychological Trauma 2. Unique consequences of crisis intervention a. Crisis intervention may cause harm if not truly needed. i. It may increase crisis exposure. ii.It may reduce perceptions of independent problem solving. iii. It may generate self-fulfilling prophecies. Note. Berkowitz (2003); Everly (1999).
Page 1 and 2: Crisis Intervention Using the NASP
Page 3 and 4: Preface On the importance of being
Page 5 and 6: Basic Assumptions Crisis Event Char
Page 7 and 8: Basic Assumptions Crisis Event Char
Page 9 and 10: Basic Assumptions Levels of School
Page 11 and 12: Basic Assumptions © Yuri Arcurs |
Page 13 and 14: © Monkey Business Images |Dreamsti
Page 15 and 16: Basic Assumptions The Incident Comm
Page 17 and 18: Prevent & Prepare for Psychological
Page 19 and 20: Reaffirm Health & Safety Psychologi
Page 21: Reaffirm Health & Safety “Once tr
Page 25 and 26: Evaluate Psychological Trauma Asses
Page 39 and 40: Note. Brock et al. (2009). Conducti
Page 41 and 42: 1. Reaffirm physical health. 2. Ens
Page 43 and 44: Provide Interventions and Respond t
Page 65 and 66: Concluding Comments About the PREPa
Page 67: Concluding Comments Acknowledgment

Crisis Intervention Using the NASP PREPaRE Model (2nd ed.)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?