16.04.2013 Views

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2: The Impact of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />

seemed to be invariant to the detail of geography used or the way in which the recession<br />

was modelled. They concluded that the spatial effects of the minimum wage on employment<br />

were limited.<br />

2.99 Previous research using spatial data has generally concluded that there is little strong<br />

evidence of any employment effects. Analysing employment changes across local areas in<br />

the period that covered the introduction of the minimum wage, Stewart (2002) found some<br />

weak but not statistically significant evidence of a reduction in employment. Galindo-Rueda<br />

and Pereira (2004) also found no evidence on employment levels but did find a significant<br />

impact of the minimum wage on employment growth. Looking at the 2003 and 2004<br />

upratings, Experian (2007) found no effects of the minimum wage on regional employment.<br />

Assessing the period 2001-2006, Dickens, Riley and Wilkinson (2010) found no effects on<br />

employment but did find some weak evidence that the minimum wage may have encouraged<br />

participation and that had led to increases in unemployment. However, Dolton, Rosazza<br />

Bondibene and Wadsworth (2009) found that unemployment rates fell more in areas where<br />

the minimum wage bite was greatest in the period of large minimum wage increases (2003-<br />

2006). Over the whole period (1999-2007), they found little impact of the minimum wage on<br />

employment but they did find a small but significant positive effect of the minimum wage<br />

since 2003 when investigating individual years.<br />

2.100 The impact of the minimum wage has also been investigated using numerous case studies<br />

of firms. These have generally consisted of surveys of firms across the low-paying sectors.<br />

Examples include IDS (2011a), which summarised the findings of their previous reports,<br />

Grimshaw and Carroll (2002) and Cronin and Thewlis (2004). These have generally concluded<br />

that firms have tended to make changes to their pay structures in response to minimum<br />

wage increases rather than adjust employment.<br />

Views on Employment and Hours<br />

2.101 Employers’ organisations have emphasised the particular pressures currently faced by<br />

businesses, especially those which are lower-paying and consumer-facing. CBI said that<br />

these sectors, where the NMW has a major impact, face particularly challenging trading<br />

conditions. It said that consumers’ budgets were stretched, and further job losses were<br />

more likely than increased levels of employment.<br />

2.102 BHA, BBPA and BISL noted employment had peaked in hospitality in 2008, before falling<br />

back in the following two years. These bodies thought that some of this might be due to<br />

cumulative rises in the minimum wage, although anecdotal evidence suggested that many<br />

employers cut hours rather than headcount during the recession. The NMW may, however,<br />

have reduced job growth, although they thought this was probably not capable of proof.<br />

Unlike last year, the ALMR did not find job losses and reduced hours or benefits resulting<br />

from the rise in the minimum wage, but it remained concerned about the likely impact of any<br />

additional costs and regulatory burdens at this point in the economic cycle.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!