16.04.2013 Views

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2: The Impact of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />

bottom decile had increases in line with price inflation, whereas those in the upper part of the<br />

distribution had wage rises greater than those at the median (and above average wage<br />

increases). Since 1998, those at the bottom of the earnings distribution have had much<br />

higher increases than those in the middle of the distribution. However, the increases at the<br />

bottom have moderated significantly since 2004.<br />

Figure 2.15: Annualised Growth in Hourly Earnings for Employees Aged 22 and Over, by<br />

Percentile, UK, 1992-2011<br />

Annualised change in earnings (per cent)<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

5<br />

10<br />

Lowest<br />

decile<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

1992-1997 1998-2004<br />

45<br />

50<br />

Median Highest<br />

decile<br />

Percentile of gross hourly earnings excluding overtime distribution (adults aged 22 and over)<br />

55<br />

60<br />

65<br />

70<br />

75<br />

80<br />

85<br />

90<br />

95<br />

2004-2010 2010-2011<br />

Source: LPC estimates based on New Earnings Survey (NES), April 1992-1997, and ASHE: without supplementary information, April<br />

1999-2004; with supplementary information, April 2004-2006; and 2007 methodology, April 2006-2011, standard weights (NES<br />

unweighted), including those not on adult rates of pay, UK.<br />

Note: Direct comparisons before and after 1997, before and after 2004, and before and after 2006, should be made with care due to<br />

changes in the data series.<br />

2.47 Over the year to April 2011, those employees in the bottom decile had wage rises greater<br />

than those at the median. However, those between the 15th and 40th percentiles experienced<br />

little or no growth in wages between April 2010 and April 2011. Those at the top experienced<br />

the largest increases.<br />

Pay Gaps<br />

2.48 We saw in Figures 2.4 and 2.14 that particular groups of workers (women, disabled people,<br />

ethnic minorities, migrants, and those with no qualifications) are more likely to be in<br />

minimum wage jobs. The extent of the difference in pay between these groups and their<br />

counterparts who are less likely to be in minimum wage jobs can be measured by looking at<br />

pay gaps (the proportional difference between the earnings of two groups). We tend to focus<br />

on the median pay gaps for full-time workers, as they allow closer comparison of like-withlike<br />

and are less affected than the mean by outliers in the earnings distribution.<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!