16.04.2013 Views

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: The Impact of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />

Table 2.1: Bite of the Adult <strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong> at Various Points on the Earnings<br />

Distribution for Those Aged 22 and Over, UK, 1999-2011<br />

ASHE without<br />

supplementary<br />

information<br />

ASHE with<br />

supplementary<br />

information<br />

ASHE 2007<br />

methodology<br />

Data<br />

year<br />

(April)<br />

Adult<br />

NMW<br />

(£)<br />

Lowest<br />

decile<br />

Adult minimum wage as % of<br />

Lowest<br />

quartile<br />

Median Mean Upper<br />

quartile<br />

Upper<br />

decile<br />

1999 3.60 83.9 65.1 45.7 36.6 30.4 21.1<br />

2000 3.60 81.2 64.2 45.4 35.7 29.8 20.6<br />

2001 3.70 80.3 63.0 44.2 34.7 29.0 19.9<br />

2002 4.10 85.2 67.5 47.2 36.5 30.8 21.0<br />

2003 4.20 82.4 65.8 46.5 35.9 30.5 20.8<br />

2004<br />

2004<br />

4.50 84.9 67.6 47.5 37.2 31.3 21.4<br />

4.50 85.6 68.3 48.1 37.7 31.6 21.7<br />

2005 4.85 88.0 69.9 49.4 38.5 32.3 22.1<br />

2006<br />

2006<br />

5.05 87.5 69.9 49.4 38.4 32.3 22.1<br />

5.05 87.5 70.0 49.7 38.5 32.5 22.3<br />

2007 5.35 89.2 71.7 51.0 39.6 33.6 22.9<br />

2008 5.52 89.7 71.6 50.6 39.2 33.2 22.8<br />

2009 5.73 89.6 71.7 50.7 39.8 33.3 22.9<br />

2010 5.80 89.7 71.9 50.9 39.6 33.2 22.9<br />

2011 5.93 91.2 73.4 51.7 40.2 33.9 23.2<br />

Source: LPC estimates based on ASHE: without supplementary information, April 1999-2004; with supplementary information, April<br />

2004-2006; and 2007 methodology, April 2006-2011, standard weights, including those not on adult rates of pay, UK.<br />

Note: Direct comparisons before and after 2004, and before and after 2006, should be made with care due to changes in the data<br />

series.<br />

2.27 The bite in the low-paying sectors, and in small and medium-sized firms, is much greater than<br />

in the economy as a whole. In contrast to the pattern observed above, the bite in the lowpaying<br />

sectors and in small, especially micro, firms continued to increase between 2007 and<br />

2010. The bite among the low-paying sectors has increased further in 2011.<br />

2.28 Figure 2.8 shows that between 1999 and 2011 the NMW for workers aged 22 and over<br />

increased on average by just over 4 per cent each year, compared with earnings growth of<br />

about 3 per cent in the low-paying sectors, and 3.6 per cent in the non low-paying sectors.<br />

Examining annualised earnings growth before and after the onset of the recession, we can<br />

see that between 1999 and 2007 there was very little difference between the low-paying and<br />

non low-paying sectors, although both were over 1 percentage point below the annual<br />

increase in the NMW. However, since 2007 annual earnings growth in the non low-paying<br />

sectors has been almost 2 percentage points a year higher than in the low-paying sectors.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!