16.04.2013 Views

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />

4<br />

Figure 1.1: Effect of Revisions to Gross Domestic Product, UK, 2007-2011<br />

GDP growth on previous quarter (per cent)<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.0<br />

-1.5<br />

-2.0<br />

-2.5<br />

2007 Q2<br />

2007 Q3<br />

2007 Q4<br />

2008 Q1<br />

2008 Q2<br />

2008 Q3<br />

2008 Q4<br />

2009 Q1<br />

2009 Q2<br />

Previous data<br />

2009 Q3<br />

Quarter<br />

2009 Q4<br />

2010 Q1<br />

2010 Q2<br />

Latest data<br />

Source: ONS, quarterly change in GDP (IHYQ), quarterly, seasonally adjusted, UK, Q2 2007-Q3 2011.<br />

Note: The data were revised in Q2 2011 and data for Q3 2011 are not available on the old basis.<br />

1.10 The revised data show much stronger growth in 2007, before the onset of recession, but<br />

then even lower output throughout 2008, a more robust recovery in 2009, and little change in<br />

2010. More importantly for our recommendations, growth since the third quarter of 2010 has<br />

been much weaker than expected. In the year to the third quarter of 2011, GDP grew by<br />

0.5 per cent and growth for the whole of 2011 was expected to be just 0.9 per cent. This is<br />

considerably below the 2 per cent growth expected when we discussed the minimum wage<br />

recommendations in January 2011.<br />

1.11 Figure 1.2 shows that the revised data now suggest that the recession was not as long as<br />

previously thought but it was much deeper. The recession ended in the third rather than the<br />

fourth quarter of 2009. It therefore lasted for five quarters, the same length as the 1980s and<br />

1990s recessions. GDP fell by 7.1 per cent (compared with the 6.4 per cent estimate<br />

available in January 2011). This was a considerably greater loss of output than in either of the<br />

two previous recessions – the 1980s (4.7 per cent) or the 1990s (2.5 per cent).<br />

2010 Q3<br />

2010 Q4<br />

2011 Q1<br />

2011 Q2<br />

2011 Q3<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.0<br />

-1.5<br />

-2.0<br />

-2.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!