16.04.2013 Views

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

National Minimum Wage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />

Project title and<br />

researchers<br />

The Impact of the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong><br />

<strong>Wage</strong> on Earnings,<br />

Employment and<br />

Hours Through the<br />

Recession<br />

Mark Bryan, Andrea<br />

Salvatori and Mark<br />

Taylor (Institute for<br />

Social and Economic<br />

Research, University of<br />

Essex)<br />

Econometric<br />

Modelling of Pay<br />

Settlements and<br />

Earnings by Industry<br />

1977-2011<br />

Peter Dolton<br />

(University of<br />

Sussex and Centre<br />

for Economic<br />

Performance, LSE),<br />

Gerry Makepeace<br />

(Cardiff University) and<br />

Andrew Tremayne<br />

(University of New<br />

South Wales)<br />

166<br />

Aims and methodology Key findings and results<br />

The project aimed to address three main areas:<br />

1. the effect of the minimum wage on employment and<br />

hours;<br />

2. the effect of the minimum wage on earnings; and<br />

3. the effect of the minimum wage on entry to<br />

employment.<br />

The analysis built on previous work by Dickens, Riley<br />

and Wilkinson (2009) and Stewart (2004a). It used DID<br />

methods similar to previous studies of the impacts<br />

of the NMW. The DID method involved comparing<br />

outcomes for a treatment group of individuals that<br />

was directly affected by the NMW with those for a<br />

control group of similar individuals earning just above<br />

the NMW. Using two variants of the DID method, they<br />

examined:<br />

(i) changes over time in the outcomes of the treatment<br />

and control group (horizontal DID); and<br />

(ii) differences between the treatment and control<br />

groups with respect to two additional groups further<br />

up the wage distribution (vertical DID).<br />

The two methods embodied different assumptions about<br />

the effects of macroeconomic trends on the treatment<br />

and control groups, and provided a sensitivity check on<br />

these assumptions.<br />

The research covered adults (those aged 22 and over)<br />

and youths (those aged 18-21) and used the periods<br />

2003-2007 and 2008-2010 to discern recessionary<br />

effects.<br />

They used their results from this first part to address the<br />

impact on earnings.<br />

This project extended their previous analysis (Dolton,<br />

Lin, Makepeace, and Tremayne 2011) that had<br />

looked at how recessions affected the distribution<br />

of pay settlements and earnings. The period under<br />

consideration was extended from 2009 to 2011 and used<br />

quarterly data as well as annual data.<br />

Raw data on settlements from the CBI, Incomes Data<br />

Services (IDS) and XpertHR were merged with data<br />

from the LFS and relevant Office for <strong>National</strong> Statistics<br />

aggregates to create a data set covering the period from<br />

1977-2011. This was then disaggregated by industry<br />

(splitting the data into 14 and 28 industry groupings).<br />

The forces that drive pay settlements were examined:<br />

productivity changes; the state of the labour market; and<br />

the extent and effectiveness of trade union activity and<br />

bargaining with management.<br />

They used a modified Panel Instrumental Variable<br />

estimation method to assess the dynamic relationships<br />

between the variables.<br />

The findings were subjected to a number of robustness<br />

checks including different estimation methods; levels of<br />

industrial disaggregation; and definitions of recession.<br />

They also looked at the dynamic structure of key<br />

variables and restricted their analysis to using just one<br />

settlement series.<br />

The findings showed little evidence of NMW upratings<br />

adversely affecting employment retention either before<br />

or during the recession.<br />

There was some evidence of upratings having a<br />

negative impact on hours, particularly among young<br />

workers. They found that hours were reduced by 3-4<br />

a week. There was some evidence of the impact on<br />

hours being greater during the recession than it was<br />

previously. It should be noted that these results for<br />

young workers were based on relatively small samples.<br />

The effect of upratings on the weekly earnings of<br />

minimum wage workers depended on the extent to<br />

which the magnitude of the uprating was offset by<br />

any negative effect of the NMW on hours. The impact<br />

was greatest for young workers who may have seen<br />

reductions in weekly income.<br />

The NMW was found to have had no impact on the jobfinding<br />

probabilities of unemployed adults in any year.<br />

They concluded that there was little evidence that the<br />

recession had increased the sensitivity of employment<br />

or hours to the NMW but that their results added to<br />

existing evidence that the minimum wage may have<br />

adversely affected hours. They believed that hours<br />

should be the focus of future research.<br />

The main estimation results from this project were:<br />

●● The effect of the NMW on wage settlement levels<br />

was not statistically different from zero. This<br />

contrasted with the significant positive finding in<br />

their previous research.<br />

●● The driving force of settlement levels was the past<br />

level of settlements. This finding demonstrated<br />

the importance of the dynamic modelling of the<br />

settlements process.<br />

●● The macro variables had a strong and consistent<br />

effect on settlements.<br />

●● There was a negative effect of unemployment<br />

on wage settlements. This was consistent with<br />

previous literature on the Phillips Curve and the<br />

<strong>Wage</strong> Curve.<br />

●● Counter to earlier findings (in the previous year’s<br />

report by the authors) the effect of growth on pay<br />

settlements was not counterintuitive and now<br />

appeared to be positive but of variable impact when<br />

the dynamic structure was taken into account.<br />

●● There was a clear positive effect of price inflation<br />

on wage settlements. This result was unsurprising<br />

given the importance of inflation in current and<br />

previous time periods in wage negotiations.<br />

Their estimation was subjected to extensive robustness<br />

checks but the results generally remained unchanged,<br />

although weighting the data by number of employees<br />

did make some differences to their conclusions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!