National Minimum Wage
National Minimum Wage
National Minimum Wage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Minimum</strong> <strong>Wage</strong><br />
23 The research did however highlight several issues where future workers might have reduced<br />
terms and conditions compared with existing workers. First, the agricultural minimum wage<br />
is paid from age 16 and young workers in future may be paid at rates lower than previously.<br />
Second, new apprentices may also receive lower wage rates than those of existing<br />
apprentices. Third, under the AWBEW, school-age children are entitled to a minimum wage<br />
but when the NMW framework applies to agriculture they will be exempt from the minimum<br />
wage. Fourth, the NMW does not include entitlements such as annual leave, sick pay, bad<br />
weather payments and a dog allowance, which may affect new workers. Fifth, the<br />
accommodation offset is the same under both the AWBEW and NMW (currently equivalent<br />
to £33.11 a week) except for those living in tied cottages, where the maximum offset is just<br />
£1.50 a week. In future, workers in such employer-provided accommodation may have to pay<br />
higher rents than they would currently.<br />
24 Our research programme for the 2012 Report has added to the existing literature on the<br />
impacts of the NMW. Taking all of this knowledge collectively, we again conclude that, on<br />
balance, the research generally finds little or no adverse impact of the minimum wage on<br />
employment. However, some further evidence has been gathered this year to suggest that<br />
the minimum wage may have led to a modest reduction in hours but this finding is still not<br />
consistently robust across time and datasets to be definitive. Against the backdrop of the<br />
main body of research finding no negative effects on employment, there has been more<br />
evidence than previously that there may have been an adverse impact on employment of<br />
certain groups in particular periods. These adverse findings, however, are not robust, being<br />
confined to particular workers (young workers or female part-time workers) in particular time<br />
periods using certain datasets and model specifications. The research found little evidence of<br />
an adverse effect of the introduction of the Apprentice Rate on the provision of<br />
apprenticeships by employers.<br />
164