12.04.2013 Views

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Wreck</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>DKM</strong> <strong>Bismarck</strong> <strong>−</strong> A <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Forensics</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

guns by more than 5,000 meters.) Painfully aware <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the Hood, the British<br />

were attempting to close the range and lessen the risk <strong>of</strong> destruction resulting from plunging fire.<br />

Less than ten minutes after opening fire, Hood blew up and sank, destroyed by 381-mm shellfire<br />

which penetrated to and detonated her magazines.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ammunition on Hood was destroyed by deflagration <strong>−</strong> intense burning (<strong>of</strong> some 112<br />

tons <strong>of</strong> cordite) with no means to dissipate its energy vertically or horizontally <strong>−</strong> which wrecked<br />

the Hood’s hull structure, causing the ship to break apart into two sections before beginning its<br />

plunge to the sea bed.<br />

A KEY HIT ON THE BISMARCK’s BOW<br />

Abeam <strong>of</strong> the capstans on the forecastle <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bismarck</strong> is a large oblique-shaped hole in the<br />

starboard side, above the water line and Batteriedeck 6 and forward <strong>of</strong> the 60-mm splinter belt. It<br />

occurs just above the forward edge <strong>of</strong> a faded painted fake bow wave. <strong>The</strong> hole is clearly bent<br />

outward, apparently from the effects <strong>of</strong> a shell passing through the ship from the port side 7 . An<br />

elongated hole in the deck above was first thought to be the entry hole for this round, but careful<br />

measurement indicates the two holes are unrelated.<br />

<strong>The</strong> entry hole on the port side was not imaged, as there were a number <strong>of</strong> shell holes<br />

noted in the area where the shell was believed to have entered. <strong>The</strong> exit hole is consistent with a<br />

trajectory through the bow with an angle <strong>of</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> about 15 degrees and a shell path from astern.<br />

This is consistent with the expected angle <strong>of</strong> fall for a shell fired by Prince <strong>of</strong> Wales at a range <strong>of</strong><br />

about 16,000 meters <strong>−</strong> refer to Table 2.<br />

Table 2<br />

Range Table Data for the 356-mm Gun 8<br />

Range Angle <strong>of</strong> Fall Striking Velocity<br />

13,720 meters 11.5 degrees 526 meters per second<br />

18,290 meters 18.2 degrees 476 meters per second<br />

<strong>The</strong> shell’s path was an oblique one from port to starboard across Compartments XX and<br />

XXI; the second, third, and fourth watertight compartments aft <strong>of</strong> the forward perpendicular<br />

(XX, XXI, and XXII) were damaged by fragments caused by the passage <strong>of</strong> this heavy projectile<br />

through the ship. <strong>The</strong> entry hole is above the Batteriedeck, while the exit hole, above that deck<br />

or near that deck’s intersection with the side shell. <strong>The</strong> plating around the exit hole is bent<br />

outward. <strong>The</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> the exit hole in the <strong>Bismarck</strong>’s starboard bow supports the judgment<br />

that the shell passed through the ship without exploding 9 .<br />

Compartments XX and XXI are roughly centered on the fore capstans, which correspond<br />

perfectly to the exit hole. Since the exit hole was slightly above the waterline but was within the<br />

bow wave, water flowed in and eventually flooded compartments on the Upper, Middle and<br />

Lower Platform Decks. <strong>The</strong> ship’s trim down by the bow aggravated this problem. <strong>The</strong> reserve<br />

oil tanks were located in way <strong>of</strong> the shell trajectory, but below the Middle Platform Deck. Hence<br />

we believe that none <strong>of</strong> the reserve tanks were affected by this shell’s trajectory. If there was a<br />

6 This is the Second Deck in the US Navy.<br />

7 LT Gerhard Junack mentioned in correspondence with William Garzke that the shell passed through the<br />

ship without exploding. We believe it may have detonated in the water adjacent to the ship.<br />

8 John Campbell. Naval Weapons <strong>of</strong> World War Two. London: Conway Maritime Press, Ltd., 1985.<br />

9 Admiral Lütjens reported this in a message after the battle was over.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!