11.04.2013 Views

Design Guidelines - Senatobia, Mississippi

Design Guidelines - Senatobia, Mississippi

Design Guidelines - Senatobia, Mississippi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

guIdelIneS for exIStIng reSIdentIal-type BuIldIngS<br />

Rehabilitation projects involving<br />

foundation work should preserve<br />

the original appearance and materials<br />

of the foundation. If an open<br />

foundation must be enclosed, the<br />

infill should be either a simple wood<br />

lattice or a well-ventilated enclosure<br />

using material similar to that of the<br />

original foundation. If possible, the<br />

enclosure should be recessed to preserve<br />

the original foundation appearance.<br />

Additional foundation vents<br />

should be compatible in style and<br />

material with the structure.<br />

The most common material used for<br />

the supporting base of old buildings<br />

in <strong>Senatobia</strong> is brick. Although some<br />

of <strong>Senatobia</strong>’s old structures have<br />

basements or have floors at grade<br />

level, the most prevalent foundation<br />

types are brick piers or solid masonry<br />

with a crawl space.<br />

Foundations should not be altered<br />

to disguise problems, which must be<br />

identified and solved. Typical problems<br />

are cracks from differential<br />

settlement, failure due to inadequate<br />

structure, decay of materials, and<br />

damage from renovations.<br />

The following are among the considerations<br />

used to decide whether<br />

foundation alterations are appropriate.<br />

• The cause of foundation problems<br />

must be addressed and repairs<br />

made before any proposed cosmetic<br />

alterations to hide damage will be<br />

considered.<br />

• Windows, doors, or other openings<br />

should not be enlarged or cut<br />

into a foundation unless the size and<br />

placement of the new openings are<br />

compatible with the design of the<br />

building and its structural integrity.<br />

(Continued)<br />

• Existing openings may be sealed with<br />

a compatible material only if<br />

it can be shown that foundation ventilation<br />

will be adequate.<br />

• Recessed brick lattice between brick<br />

piers normally is acceptable if the<br />

brick matches the existing foundation.<br />

Concrete may be allowed if it has been<br />

covered with a finish, such<br />

as a smooth stucco, that is compatible<br />

with the building.<br />

• Decorative, original foundation vents<br />

should be retained.<br />

• Paint and other coatings will not be<br />

considered as a substitute for masonry<br />

repairs and repointing.<br />

• Additions to a foundation, such as<br />

new porch piers, should match the appearance<br />

of old, intact materials.<br />

Lattice is an appropriate infill between piers, especially<br />

for porches. It allows air circulation to prevent<br />

moisture from accumulating under a building.<br />

4.1.2<br />

founDaTions<br />

The acceptable brick enclosure (top<br />

photo) was “pierced” to allow for air<br />

flow under the building. While the infill<br />

(bottom photo) was recessed to<br />

emphasize the original brick piers, the<br />

lack of ventilation is inappropriate.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!